10 Reasons Why Najib Razak And His Regime Is The Worst

The Prime Minister is no longer respected and his position has become untenable since last July. We even had an instance a couple of weeks ago where an accomplished young man had called the Prime Minister a national disgrace.

Truly, even among the youth, his reputation is widely seen as tarnished.

A recent survey had produced an unsurprising result – that 4 out of 5 Malaysians are unhappy with the Prime Minister. Approval rating has sunk to an all time low of 31%.

How could this happened?

Here are the reasons why this Prime Minister and his regime is the worst collection of leaders this country has ever had.

  1. They slander people and shamelessly lie to the public when caught with a blunder. For example, when Wall Street Journal broke the story that billions went into the Prime Minister’s private accounts, the first thing he did was to slander Tun Dr Mahathir and claimed the story is a lie. In his own words, he said “the latest allegation is that I have taken state-linked funds for personal gain. I believe Tun, working hand in glove with foreign nationals, including the now discredited political attack blog Sarawak Report, is behind this latest lie.”  Although WSJ never said he used it for personal gain, he shifted the goalpost by saying they accused him of that. He even made a remark that if he really wanted to steal the money, he won’t do it in a local bank, just to reassure the public that no money went in into his personal account. But events afterwards proved the money did go into his accounts and all the slander and lies he concocted were exposed.
  2. ghj

    The infamous freudian slip

    His next move in trying to prove that he did not receive any money is to publicly declare that he will sue WSJ. But this also ended in a whimper when after so many months have passed, Najib still cowardly refrained from suing WSJ. For all the stupid excuses made to justify why he hadn’t done so, people around the world already knew that there is no need to sue WSJ because all their allegations were proven right after all. Indeed, his second pathetic attempt to sue a veteran politician over an allegation that public money was funneled into his private accounts also ended rather flaccidly.

  3. The above two reasons should already disqualify him from being the Prime Minister, but it did not deter his sycophants in urging him to stay on. Shameless and unrepentant can aptly describe the Prime Minister and his regime. Another reason to show why this is the worst administration ever is when Najib, with a straight face said that 1MDB won’t be using public money to bail out 1MDB. This is an outright lie because it is a well known fact that 1MDB received RM950 million standby credit from the Ministry of Finance to service its debts. That money is of course, public money. And at one event in Johor, he even said that 1MDB has not incurred any losses! How desperate can one be? If that’s the case, then the RM665 million loss in 1MDB accounts for the year 2014 must have been a success according to his standards. Another shocking statement made was the “we must not borrow money to develop projects” which he uttered three days ago. Perhaps he should look in the cesspool known as 1MDB and drown himself in there. What kind of a leader is this to make such statement? And some people still support him?
  4. Maybe this Minister of Finance doesn't know finance

    Maybe this Minister of Finance doesn’t know finance

    One stupidity this regime is showing the whole world is their way of defending Najib Razak. When RM2.6 billion was proven to be inside his personal accounts, they made a diversion by saying that it is acceptable for a PM to get ‘political donation’ into his bank accounts! Probably the law that makes this permissible exists only in a twisted world called “Najibland”. Anti-corruption organisations across the world looked at this issue with horror and called it ‘grand corruption’. On top of that, Najib Razak actually challenged the opposition to reveal their source of political donation before he can reveal his! Continuing the tradition of being an overeager cockerel which bolted at the first sign of trouble, he became quiet like a mouse, probably suffering amnesia and forgot all about his challenge when Bersih 2.0, one of the opposition groups had declared and presented their accounts and political donation to the public. Is this a trait of a good leader? Certainly not.

  5. And didn’t we all feel ashamed but laughed real hard when the Prime Minister went missing during the Nothing2Hide event? They were citing ‘security reasons’ for his cowardly non-attendance; the same excuse given for him not to attend and officiate the International Anti-Corruption Conference last month. What a disgrace. How can Malaysians accept a leader who is not brave enough to face an audience? Even now he doesn’t accommodate any Q&A session with reporters for fear of facing tough questions. In fact, in the current Parliamentary session, any questions regarding 1MDB and the RM2.6 billion ‘donation’ are either rejected or delayed. This is how a scared regime would typically act when asked to stand up and face the music. Is this Government capable and has the credibility to face any economic and national challenges? Trying to portray itself like a thug but in actual fact, a scaredy-cat? Some of these people even thought that the act of sacking the AG for probing the wrongdoing, and sacking a Deputy Prime Minister for asking too many questions is a courageous behaviour! Laughable indeed. The Government is acting like a spoiled brat with too much power in his hands.
  6. One pensive and two smiling puddings

    One pensive and two smiling puddings

    Speaking about spoiled brats, what about the recent press release of SRC International which tried to whitewash their activities by telling the public that all the RM4 billion they received from KWAP are accounted for? Again, just like 1MDB, its little brother did not furnish any proof. Indeed, a multi billion company like SRC do not even have a website. Last checked, their website is still under construction! What kind of secret business deals are they doing inside there? Their accounts are not even available to public. SRC International had the audacity to say “we call on those quarters who are engaged in efforts to overthrow the government to desist from involving SRC in their political campaign and to avoid making false and unsubstantiated allegations against us.” Just like 1MDB, SRC International seems to be issuing political statements when they did not provide evidence to prove their innocence. The proof in the pudding is in the eating. And the pudding in the form of Nik Faisal Nik Amir and Datuk Suboh Mohd Yassin are missing and hiding from being investigated. SRC’s press release is moot and lack credibility when their directors are hiding like escaped fugitives. The Prime Minister could have called these friends of his to return home and face the law, but he did not. The MACC is left on the lurch and the investigation into the RM42 million of SRC money that went directly into the Prime Minister’s personal bank accounts is seriously delayed.

  7. "I should have turned down the deputy ministerial post, but I have no principles, that's why!"

    “I should have turned down the deputy ministerial post, so that there won’t be any delays”

    Yes, investigations were forcefully delayed by the actions by Najib Razak but his newly appointed PAC chief, Datuk Hasan Arifin stated that it is only ‘perception’ by the public that the 1MDB investigations are hindered. The public is appalled by the statement made by this idiot. Here is the proof that the delays in 1MDB investigations are not just about perception – the previous PAC Chief, Datuk Nurjazlan had promised in the month of June that PAC will interview Arul Kanda and Shahrol Halmi in August, this is because, both of those cowards had asked for deferment in their interview sessions. But that did not happen because the PAC was dismantled at the end of July. Now is already the month of October. Has PAC interviewed those wanted men? So for Hasan Arifin to stupidly say there are no delays is just mindboggling. Is this the kind of leadership you can trust?

  8. The other reason is the economy. This regime seriously do not know what to do with it. Their first action after months of sitting on their thumbs is to establish a special committee to tackle the current global market crisis. After the ringgit had plunged to an all time low for more than a decade, their solution is to use RM20 billion of public money in the form of funds from PNB, Khazanah Nasional and KWAP (again) to boost up the stock market. This had artificially led the stock market to rise up momentarily because retail investors are buying the shares anticipating the Government will go in and buy more shares in the market. Basically what the Government hope for is to “artificially boost the stock market in order to give the impression that the real economy is doing well”, so says an astute observer. Nazri Aziz, the clueless tourism minister even brayed like a village simpleton by saying that a weak ringgit will cause a tourist influx when a recent data had shown that the number of tourists are declining. There are so many things to say about this dithering economy perpetuated by Najib hanging on by his fingertips as the prime minister, but that requires a whole separate article.
  9. Lies, lies lies and more lies

    Lies, lies lies and more lies

    And the apparent lack of money is also a reason why this Government is the worst in financial management. At one point during the last general election, Najib Razak made a promise that tolls between cities will be reduced gradually. But the opposite happened. Instead of reducing the toll rates, his administration had hiked up the rates! Citing no more money to pay compensation to the toll concessionaires, Najib Razak and his regime shamelessly announced that the money saved can be used to build schools and hospitals. The kick in the teeth came from the announcement from the Works Minister where he said that the Government had to pay RM558.7 million in compensation if toll rates are not increased. Well, if 1MDB hadn’t have to be bailed out by the amount of RM950 million back in February, then right now there shouldn’t have been an increase in traveling costs for the public! In fact, back in 2011, this government had prolonged the concession on some of the highways which supposedly to end in 2018 and had revised it to 2038! Note that Najib Razak gave the same reason when they tried to impose GST – to build schools and hospitals. What happened to the GST’s billions? Also, the government should have saved billions when they canceled subsidy for petrol and sugar. Yet the prime minister is often heard crying like a baby how it is so hard to find money. People are starting to get panic. Why don’t you just keep quiet and do your job? Do you even understand the word ‘financial management’?

  10. And lastly among others, the fact that Najib Razak is unrepentant and oblivious to the mistakes he has made, is spectacularly recorded. This blog had written many articles on how he lacks common sense and the necessary intelligence to act like a proper Prime Minister. We have published articles lambasting him on many areas in the past. Some as early as 2008. Out of 114 articles written about him, 99% of it are critical. A few of it can be read as below:

But he continues to remain ignorant on the calls of his resignation. Surely the amount of hatred he received in his own social media platforms is a sign which he needs to heed. But apparently he only recognise his detractor in a form of just one man – Tun Dr Mahathir. And his modus operandi to defend himself? To tell the public that Tun Dr Mahathir is worse than him. In his mind, this makes Tun Dr Mahathir have no moral standing to ask for his resignation. But Najib is not accountable to only one person. He is answerable to the millions of people in Malaysia. Tun Dr Mahathir is just a messenger; he is not a prime minister anymore. To sully and badmouth a messenger means to insult Malaysians which had called for his resignation too. He even arrogantly advised his detractors to look at the mistakes they made in the past and “not only find fault in others”. So what kind of mistakes do the common people have that made them unworthy to call for his resignation? This kind of arrogance is clearly a product of hubris and miscalculated sense of popularity. After factoring in all the 10 reasons above, it is amazing to think that some are still supporting him to lead this country. Common sense is indeed a luxury these days. None of the cabinet ministers, the leaders in Barisan Nasional and all the fat divisional leaders in Umno have it.

You might also want to read:


2) 1MDB Kalau Labur Di ASB adalah LEBIH UNTUNG dan Lebih Selamat Dari Labur Dengan Petrosaudi! Duit Pun Masih Cash Bukan Just Unit..

3) 1MDB silap mata. How to make USD $2.33 billion “disappear”

4) Separation of Powers

5) The Idiot Guide to the Illogical Kandasamies of 1MDB

6) Urus Niaga 1MDB Luar Biasa Terus Bebani Malaysia

7) Najib is putting the people at ransom

8) The Chinese Dilemma in an Umno Problem

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters, #malaysian-judiciary, #reference, #twitter

What is the TPPA, according to the Americans

Statement by the President on the Trans-Pacific Partnership

October 5, 2015

“I’ve spent every day of my presidency fighting to grow our economy and strengthen our middle class. That means making sure our workers have a fair shot to get ahead here at home, and a fair chance to compete around the world. My approach to trade has been guided by a unifying principle: leveling the playing field for American workers and businesses, so we can export more products stamped Made in America all over the world that support higher-paying American jobs here at home.

Over the summer, Democrats and Republicans in Congress came together to help the United States negotiate agreements for free and fair trade that would support our workers, our businesses, and our economy as a whole. When more than 95 percent of our potential customers live outside our borders, we can’t let countries like China write the rules of the global economy.We should write those rules, opening new markets to American products while setting high standards for protecting workers and preserving our environment.

That’s what the agreement reached today in Atlanta will do. Trade ministers from the 12 nations that make up the Trans-Pacific Partnership finished negotiations on an agreement that reflects America’s values and gives our workers the fair shot at success they deserve.

This partnership levels the playing field for our farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers by eliminating more than 18,000 taxes that various countries put on our products. It includes the strongest commitments on labor and the environment of any trade agreement in history, and those commitments are enforceable, unlike in past agreements. It promotes a free and open Internet. It strengthens our strategic relationships with our partners and allies in a region that will be vital to the 21st century. It’s an agreement that puts American workers first and will help middle-class families get ahead.

Once negotiators have finalized the text of this partnership, Congress and the American people will have months to read every word before I sign it. I look forward to working with lawmakers from both parties as they consider this agreement. If we can get this agreement to my desk, then we can help our businesses sell more Made in America goods and services around the world, and we can help more American workers compete and win.”

Congratulations to all the 11 nations in Asia Pacific that are on the verge of looking after the Americans’ interests and well being. They are Japan, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Thank you for the job well done.

Read more here, on how the TPPA will help Americans to “rewrite the rules of trade to benefit America’s middle class.” Because if they don’t, “competitors who don’t share our values, like China, will step in to fill that void.”

Question to the leaders of the Asia Pacific countries who will sign the TPPA: If the American strategy of the TPPA is to protect the American big corporations’ products domestically and to push it into other foreign countries ubiquitously, how will the TPPA help the products from those foreign countries to enter the local American market?

Taken from the White House’s website:

The Trans-Pacific Partnership
What You Need to Know about President Obama’s Trade Agreement

Writing the Rules To Support American Jobs

America’s trade policy may seem remote and technical, but it has a significant impact on the strength of our economy and the lives of millions of Americans. If the businesses you buy from everyday also sell their products to customers abroad, they are more likely to expand and support jobs here at home.

Why is that? Ninety-five percent of the world’s consumers live outside our borders. Our Made-in-America products and services are in demand, making American exports a vital pillar of our 21st century economy. In fact, exports played an indispensable role in America’s resurgence from the Great Recession. So, when the rules are fair, Americans can out-compete anyone in the world.

Last year, we broke the record in American exports for the fifth year in a row, selling $2.34 trillion in goods and services abroad. And here’s why that’s important: The more we sell abroad, the more higher-paying jobs we support here at home.

And those jobs tend to pay Americans better, meaning companies that export pay up to 18% more than companies that don’t.

But right now, our current trade policy — the status quo — puts our workers and businesses at a disadvantage, with higher costs for American goods, more barriers to trade, and lower standards for workers and the environment abroad than we have at home.

That is why President Obama has concluded negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership and will now work with Congress to secure its passage into law. The TPP is a trade agreement with 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific, including Canada and Mexico that will eliminate over 18,000 taxes various countries put on Made-in-America products.

With the TPP, we can rewrite the rules of trade to benefit America’s middle class. Because if we don’t, competitors who don’t share our values, like China, will step in to fill that void.

That is why the President’s trade policy is the best tool we have to ensure that our workers, our businesses, and our values are shaping globalization and the 21st century economy, rather than getting left behind.

Good luck, rest of the world.

You might also want to read:

1) What is in the TPPA?

2) Tun Mahathir in Sabah

3) Keadaan negara kita

4) The worst trade deal for the participating countries

5) No confidence vote

6) Stiglitz on TPPA : The US is committed to a lack of transparency

#new-economic-model, #reference, #tppa

What RM2,600 million can do to you

"Umno is the only government that fights the Jews"

“Umno is the only government that fights the Jews”

The Jews praises Najib

A few weeks later, the Jews praises Najib for being friendly towards them (“calling for a new dawn”).

This is typical Najib. He and his administration and the people around him have shown the world that hypocrisy is indeed the best policy. Throw in buckets full of dishonesty, then we can already sum up what is known as the Najib Leadership.

It’s like hearing him said that he will not endorse the Red Shirt rally a week before it happens but immediately after, not only he endorsed it, he also praised and congratulated the rally organisers.

It’s like when he said that Umno is not involved in sponsoring the rally, but its divisions were issued orders to ferry people into the city. Even Felda settlers were not left in peace. They were herded to attend the rally as well.

It’s like the time when Najib in March this year have asked us to wait for the AG report to know if any wrongdoing in 1MDB had occurred but when it was submitted, the AG Report was not made public.

It’s like the time when 1MDB said they will give cooperation for the investigations against them, yet the PAC told the media that 1MDB was withholding documents from the Auditor General.

Not to mention the time when Arul Kanda, hiding behind his silly smile denied 1MDB had done any misconduct, yet the main players of 1MDB had run off and hid in foreign countries. They refused to return home and be subjected to investigations; acting like fugitives who had escaped after they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

For the past several weeks, is there any actual investigation being done on 1MDB? Of course not. The lack of urgency to investigate the wrongdoings in 1MDB does not deter the government at all. In fact, they try to delay it as long as they can. The latest rumour is, even PAC will stop investigating 1MDB once the Parliament is convened to re-populate the previously decimated PAC. Najib in September made a statement to give him another 6 months to solve 1MDB woes. This was on top of the original 6 months he had asked back in June. This effectively will white wash 1MDB of any financial mismanagement.

It’s like the time when Najib issued a statement that a Special Task Force has been set up to investigate the RM2,600,000,000 that went into his personal bank account but a month after that, had effectively disbanded the said Task Force by sacking and transferring the people investigating him. Some stooge even went great lengths to say that the Task Force was illegal to begin with, forgetting the fact that Najib himself had issued a statement about its existence.

It’s like when Najib told the public that he will sue Wall Street Journal on the immediate Tuesday after they had published the damning story, only to be told that after several Tuesdays, his lawyers just wanted to know if WSJ will invoke some protection laws against a potential litigation from Najib. If they won’t, only then they will proceed.

WSJ should just say, “sue us first if you think that our story – that you have received billions of money into your personal accounts is not true!”. Najib had said exactly that in the beginning, that there was no documented proof in the WSJ story and he will sue them. Regardless, all sundry know that the nonsensical hogwash that came from Najib’s legal team against WSJ are just theatrics. A comedy sketch meant for the paid audience.

Maybe we should add ‘comical’ as one of his shining leadership traits.

It’s like the time when Najib said 1MDB did not use people’s money to bail out 1MDB but conveniently forgotten that nearly a billion was used in the form of ‘standby credit’ to pay its loan interests. Not to mention the fact that it suffered more than RM600 million in losses for financial year 2014 and raked up some RM42 billion of needless liabilities which today did not bear any fruitful dividends.

It’s like the time when Najib said thank you to Haron Din for refusing to believe the WSJ story and for refusing to think that Najib could steal and put in billions of money into his personal bank accounts. Najib then reiterated that if he indeed wanted to do that, he wouldn’t do it in a Malaysian bank account.

In the end, it was proven that the money was indeed banked in into a Malaysian bank account. The lies that he had made blatantly to the public would have disqualified him to be the prime minister; at least on moral grounds, but the stooges and the sycophants around him did not bat an eyelid and continued to support him like a halfwit donkey braying for more lies and flip flopping statements.

This is what RM2,600,000,000 can do to you.

If you count a ringgit for every second in a day, it will take you almost 83 years to reach that gargantuan amount. If someone in 1957 had started counting it, he will only finish counting them in the year 2040!

That is how much money that Najib was holding in his personal account. Can somebody now imagine how much was the RM42 billions worth of liabilities needlessly amassed?

And remember the time when Najib claimed that he did not use the RM2.6 billion for personal gain? Were we given proof that indeed not a single sen was used for his personal use? Apart from the stooges and the sycophants that felt that Najib could have never, ever, ever, ever, lied to us all, we the people with brains would want to know the breakdown on the usage of the money in order to assure us that he had never embezzled the funds within his accounts. When can we have that evidence?

It’s like the time when his stooges said that the Umno Constitution provides for its presidents to receive donations through trustee accounts but when it was revealed that none of the top Umno leaders ever knew about these ‘trustee accounts’, they shifted the goalposts by saying that it is better for the president to park the money in his OWN PERSONAL ACCOUNTS than to be held by proxies!

Fiction writers really can’t compete with this kind of script. It seems, Umno does not have a proper banking accounts. And it seems personal bank accounts are safer than Umno’s own bank accounts!

Firstly, a trustee bank account with only one signatory and nobody else knew about it is actually a very private, a very personal bank account. This is a fact, no matter how absurd they want to lie about it.

Secondly, a public official receiving money and other form of gratifications is against the MACC law. If this occurs, it will be deemed as corruption. No two ways about it. He can thump his chest to say that it was for the general election but receiving it into his personal bank account is wrong based on the law because it has elements of corruption and embezzlement. He even said it in his speech back in 2012!

Thirdly, there is no use of redefining the money as ‘donation’. The fact that Najib is hesitant to reveal the source of these billions and why it was flushed into his personal accounts; the fact that he is not transparent as to how every sen of the money was used and how he blatantly stopped all investigations against him, have made him look like a guilty despot.

And lastly, when people are asking these questions, and if the answers are not satisfactory, they will ask further questions, or may repeat the questions again and again. This is not called the shifting of goalposts. Shifting of goalposts can only happen when one is defending something, in this case – Najib. You defend him by giving good answers. This is how you protect a goal. When you give flip flopping answers and lie to cover previous lies, this can be construed as shifting the goalpost. The examples given above are testament to all this absurdity.

The one doing the attacking i.e, the ones asking the questions and uncovering the lies can never shift the goalpost precisely because there is no goal to defend in the first place. The public is questioning the government led by Najib. The government can’t turn around and said ‘why did you change your questions’ or ‘this is just mere lies’ without substantiating any evidence to prove it otherwise. That is called arrogance.

Is the mantra “the day and age where government knows all and knows best is so long over” no longer applicable? Has the government really embraced hypocrisy, dishonesty, buffoonery and arrogance as its calling card?

By the looks of it, this is what the people have to live up with.

You might also want to read:

1) Race issues a diversion from 1MDB scandal, says ex-Special Branch deputy


3) UMNO kehilangan identiti, Najib tak mungkin mampu mengembalikannya

4) HOT ! Surat Terbuka Abdul Hamid Bador Kepada Kerajaan

5) Kenapa 1MDB perlu lagi 6 bulan?: Satu analisa ringkas masalah “cashflow mismatch” dan strategi “monetization” 1MDB

6) The uglier side of Umno

7) ‘Rotten fish’ syndrome in Umno

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters, #reference

The AG’s report will not find anything wrong with 1MDB. Here’s why..

The Prime Minister, in his usual tactics of delay and diversion had failed in his responsibility of answering questions about 1MDB and had shirked on his duty as its Chairman of Board of Advisors and also as the Finance Minister, He is now shifting the accountability of answering the questions to the Auditor General and PAC.

He had since 2013 to answer the allegations himself but waited till last month to order the investigations, and now hiding behing AG and PAC as if these two are a pair of judges that must not be questioned while overseeing a trial.

He said in his blog:

  1. It is unfair for certain politicians to convict the government in the court of public opinion way before the actual facts are laid down by lawful authorities, namely the Auditor-General and the bi-partisan Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
  2. When concerns began to be raised, I wanted a detailed explanation, so I ordered the Auditor General and PAC to investigate 1MDB’s books. Anyone found guilty of embezzlement or misappropriation will be brought to justice.
  3. We are expecting the release of the preliminary report by Auditor General very soon. In the mean time, please do not speculate and form conclusions without the information that will be laid out by the Auditor General, who will provide a detailed report into 1MDB’s finances.
  4. We all want detailed answers but it is only proper to let the auditors do their job and tell us clearly what the situation really is. If we pre-empt it, we would be undermining them, as many others have done. This is not the proper procedure. If we are sincere in finding out the truth behind those allegations, we need to get the information from legitimate sources (like the Auditor General) and not third-party news portals or online blogs that might have hidden agendas.

Firstly, the Auditor General and PAC are not the judiciary where there will be a ‘contempt of court’ if anyone, including the Prime Minister should answer the questions regarding 1MDB. As it is, there are a few feeble attempt to defend 1MDB in the media, namely Salleh Keruak and a few facebook/twitter accounts set up by the PM’s social media office.

Secondly, and this is quite perplexing; why would the PM need a detailed explanation on 1MDB when he is actually for all this time holds two other posts (as FM and top boss of 1MDB). Is he not accountable for the operations and management of 1MDB? It is after all, a 100% subsidiary of Ministry of Finance.

This only exposed him as the most lackadaisical Prime Minister who has been ignorant of grave issues that are happening under his nose.

Plus, if the Prime Minister himself does not know how to explain about 1MDB, his barking dog Salleh Keruak certainly knew less about 1MDB than the Prime Minister.

The PM is after all, the most legitimate of all sources. But he wasn’t sincere in giving us the truth for the past couple of years.

Thirdly, and this is confirmed by an auditor friend in a Big Four firm – Auditor General will not find anything wrong in 1MDB’s accounts because, just like the international audit firms that had been auditing 1MDB, it will be bound by auditor’s scope and procedures. And these procedures will audit on form, rather than substance. To put it in layman’s terms – it will not audit ‘intention’ of a transaction. It will only audit the procedures of the transaction.

For instance (we start with the easiest for now):

1) Who is Jho Low and why is he dictating the business and acting on behalf of 1MDB as proven in the hacked email correspondence between him, 1MDB and the middle eastern business partners?

Most likely answer in AG report: Our investigation found nothing unusual in the accounts as all transactions are approved and signed by the relevant parties and had authorisation by the Board of Directors of 1MDB.

(the PM could have just called this business partner of his to get to the bottom of it and let us know how it went)

2) Why are the IPPs bought in 2012 at a price more than its market value and paid higher than normal commission rate to Goldman Sachs (at 10%) for the issuance of subsequent bonds?

Most likely answer in AG report: The purchases were done according to proper Board resolutions with friendly parties a.k.a. accredited valuers being called to get the market value of those assets. Payment of 10% to Goldman Sachs were done accordingly and the appropriate banks have confirmed its remittance.

(as the Chairman of the Board of Advisers, the PM could have easily gotten the answers for this since 2013 but of course he waited until 2015 and will let the AG report answer on his behalf)

3) The valuation report on the oil exploration reports in Turkmenistan and Argentina received only on 29th September 2009, a day after 1MDB’s joint venture deal with Petrosaudi was signed. 1MDB put in USD1 billion for the JV yet Petrosaudi put in USD1.5 billion of dodgy ‘oil exploration rights’ which revealed on hindsight, did not exist at that point of time. On the same day of signing, Petrosaudi asked 1MDB to repay the 3-day loan worth USD700 million which Petrosaudi had ‘supposedly’ given to the JV company on 25th September. The questions is.. WHY to all these?

Most likely answer in AG report: We could not get the 3rd party confirmation from Petrosaudi regarding those transactions but all the paperwork seemed to be in order. The Chairman and the shareholder of 1MDB had sighted the paperwork and given their approval in September 2009. We deem the transaction as immaterial as total number of assets in 1MDB is worth RM52 billion while the money unaccounted is less than 10% materiality level.

(good luck in explaining this one)

4) According to 1MDB accounts, at least RM7 billion was deposited in Cayman Islands by 1MDB through its many vehicles. But this has been denied by the Prime Minister during his delayed telecast interview last month. So where is the money?

At first he said the money is not in Cayman Islands

At first he said the money is not in Cayman Islands, but in other places.

Then he said the money will be brought in when the time comes. So where is the money located?

And he said the money will be brought in when the time comes. So where is the money located?

Most likely answer in AG report: 1MDB have safely assured us by way of director’s statutory declarations and   gave us enough comfort that the monies are there in the accounts although it is beyond our scope of work to check into 3rd party accounts such as Good Star Ltd and Petrosaudi. Overall, the 1MDB accounts is deemed true and fair and have followed all the relevant accounting regulations and standards.

(The AG team will be stretched and overwhelmed with the magnitude of this work scope)

There you go. The reasons why the AG report might not find anything. The PM is just buying off time by getting the AG to audit 1MDB’s accounts as an excuse to get a breather from all the questions asked. The issue is larger than just its accounts. It’s about governance, abuse of authority and corruption. This is precisely how Arthur Andersen gave a good audit report for Enron back then. Unless forensics audit is done, or MACC is brought in then the AG can never find anything at fault with the accounts. Either way, neither party can gain any credibility if the sitting Prime Minister still hold the post of Finance Minister and Chairman of Advisory Board of 1MDB while investigation is ongoing.


For more questions, please read: http://kadirjasin.blogspot.com/2015/05/soalan-penyiasat-1mdb-wajib-tanya.html

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters, #reference

1MDB – Persoalan Yang Tidak Terjawab Sampai Sekarang

As at 11th May 2015, the Prime Minister still hasn’t replied and give answers to the original questions about 1MDB. His answers were always in the form of attacking the bearer of those questions. But now, nearly all of his bootlickers, who not too long ago were defending 1MDB have came out in the open and asked him to answer what the rakyat had wanted to know. These are the questions, they were laden with facts, not simple allegations as what Salleh Said Keruak (who took the role of Nazri Aziz as the barking dog during Pak Lah’s time) had been trying to spin. We just want to know the truth.

Taken from chedet’s blog:

6. Dakwaan-dakwaan yang telah dibuat terhadap 1MDB bukan berbentuk tuduhan melulu. Ia disertai dengan fakta yang jelas, iaitu jumlah hutang, siapa yang mengurus, siapa yang menerima wang berbillion Ringgit, pelaburan yang dibuat, dimana wang ini disimpan, dalam bentuk apa.

7. Nama Jho Low disebut berkali-kali. Demikian juga nama-nama syarikat miliknya. Tuduhan dibuat berkenaan dengan pembelian rumah mewah olehnya di London, New York dan Holywood. Lepas itu rumah dijual kepada anak tiri Perdana Menteri dengan harga ratusan juta Ringgit. Sudah tentu ini tidak disebut dalam akaun 1MDB yang akan diperiksa oleh AG.


8. Pada mulanya duit Riza Aziz dikatakan warisan harta kekayaan dari keluarga Tun Razak. Kemudian dakwaan ini dinafi. Soalannya jika tidak dari keluarga Tun Razak dari mana datang wang yang banyak ini. Apakah ianya hasil dari perniagaan? Jika ya, apa perniagaan, dimana? Sudahkah cukai pendapatan dibayar? Kepada Kerajaan mana?

9. Pelaburan ratusan juta untuk filem “The Wolf of Wall Street” oleh Riza Aziz, anak tiri Dato Sri Najib datang dari mana? Filem ini tidak memberi keuntungan. Tidak mungkin filem ini membiayai rumah mewah yang dibeli dengan ratusan juta Ringgit atau Dolar Amerika.

10. Semua perkara-perkara ini tidak akan terdapat dalam akaun 1MDB. Tetapi rakyat ingin tahu kerana melibatkan Jho Low. Dan Jho Low disebut-sebut berkenaan dengan pengurusan 700 juta USD dari 1MDB.


11. Ada yang disebut berkenaan Petro Saudi yang juga menerima bayaran ratusan juta dolar dari 1MDB Benarkah Petro Saudi ini mendapat konsesi kawasan minyak dan gas di Argentina, di Turkmenistan dll. Apa buktinya? Benarkah JV dibuat dengan Petro Saudi sebelum ‘due diligence’ dibuat. Katanya sementara 1MDB melabur USD1 billion dalam JV dengan Petro Saudi, tetapi Petro Saudi tidak melabur satu sen pun. Apa jadi kepada wang IMDB dalam JV tidak jelas.

12. Apa sebabnya lebih dari 6 billion Ringgit (Dollar) disimpan di Cayman Island? Kerajaan tidak pernah simpan duit di lain negara selain pembelian bond. Apakah bond dibeli? Apa hasilnya?


13. Katanya wang sebanyak USD1 billion sudah dibawa balik dari Cayman dan disimpan dalam bank Singapura. Kononnya Bank Negara menjadi masalah kerana proses menyimpan wang yang banyak mesti melalui proses yang rumit. Bolehkan Bank Negara jelas kenapa menimbul masalah sedangkan 1MDB adalah syarikat Kerajaan yang dikuasai oleh Kementerian Kewangan. Jika mudah di Singapura kenapa susah sangat di Malaysia?

14. Urusan Kerajaan pernah dirahsia. Tetapi soal bayar balik hutang adalah public knowledge (dalam pengetahuan orang ramai). Orang ramai ingin tahu benarkah Ananda Krishnan memberi pinjam RM 2 billion untuk bayar faedah ini. Apakah faedah yang dikenakan oleh Ananda? Apa cara bayaran balik hutang Ananda? 1MDB dikatakan untung. Kenapa tidak dapat bayar faedah 2 billion Ringgit.

14. Why has the 1MDB become controversial? What is wrong with 1MDB?

15. From the beginning it was wrong. It started off as an off-budget and it was not put before the Parliament.

16. The money was borrowed. So it is not sovereign wealth but sovereign debt.

17. The bond raised by Goldman Sachs costs more than is usual for Government borrowings. The interest rate at 5.9% was too high. Government loans usually attract about 3% or below.

18. In addition 10% commission went to Goldman Sachs which means that 1MDB gets only 90% of the money borrowed yet has to pay interest on 100%, raising the interest rate to 6.6%. Averaging at 6%, yearly interest on 42 billion Ringgit is about RM 2.5 billion. Since 2009 there has been no income from all the assets. And 1MDB had to borrow RM2 billion to pay the interest. The loan is now RM42 billion.

19. Total initial borrowings amounted to 42,000,000,000 (42 billion Ringgit). As far as can be ascertained the investments are as follows:

a. Purchase of Tanjong Energy (now known as Powertek Energy Sdn Bhd) from Ananda Krishnan for RM 8.5 billion. This is higher than market price. The licence was about to expire.

b. Purchase of Genting Sanyen Power (now known as Kuala Langat Power Plant) for RM 2.3 billion. Again high above market price. The licence was abut to expire.

c. Purchase of Jimah Energy for RM 1.2 billion.

d. Purchase of 70 acres of land in Jalan Tun Razak for RM320 million i.e: RM64.00 psf. Land last sold in the area was at RM7,000 psf.

e. Purchase of 495 acres of land in the former Sungai Besi TUDM airport (now known as Bandar Malaysia) about RM 363.5 million i.e: at RM 91.00 psf. Estimated value RM1,000 psf.

f. Purchase of 234 acres land in Air Itam in Penang RM 1.38 billion i.e: at RM135.00 psf.

20. It should be noted that TRX land is close to land recently sold at RM7000.00 psf. Assuming the market price is RM3000.00 psf the true value of this land is 6 billion Ringgit. The Government has therefore lost 5 billion plus because 1MDB paid only RM320 million.

21. With regard to the Sungai Besi Airport land, 1MDB paid 363.5 million Ringgit for 495 acres – i.e at RM91 psf. Assuming market price for this land is RM1000 psf. the Government lost approximately 20 billion Ringgit.

22. The land in Penang is of poor quality and has more than 1000 squatters. Yet 1MDB paid RM1.3 billion i.e at RM 135 psf.

23. These are all the purchases that are known. They all add up to RM14.7 billion. So there is approximately 27 billion Ringgit left.

24. More than 1billion US Dollars were said to be paid to Petro Saudi without verification as to the value of this company or its assets.

25. Where is the rest of the money?

26. A certain amount was registered in the Cayman Islands. What was the money used for? What was brought back to Malaysia. What was brought back and deposited in a Swiss bank in Singapore. Why? Where was the money brought back from? Why is this money not used to pay the RM 2 billion interest. Why did Bank Negara allow the first tranche to be repatriated to Malaysia and not the second tranche. Now the Swiss bank has told the Singapore authorities that the document did not originate from them and does not represent a true account of the assets of 1MDB. So where is the money said to be registered in the Cayman Islands and is now brought back.

27. Clearly 1MDB is not getting any return from its investments. Not only is it losing money but the Government has lost money when 1MDB paid only RM683 million for TRX and Sungai Besi. Total loss incurred by the Government is approximately 25 billion Ringgit.

28. 1MDB revalued all its assets at 52 billion Ringgit. That is because Government land was brought at far below the market price. It can only use this money to repay loans if it succeeds in selling them off as land or after development. Progress on TRX is very slow and there is no work on Sungai Besi land. No money will be generated during development; only outflows.

29. It is this disappearance of a huge amount of borrowed money by 1MDB and the inability to answer questions regarding what happened to the funds that disqualifies Najib from being Prime Minister of Malaysia.

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters, #reference

Highly memorable quotes from Nik Aziz

Since Umno are in the midst of idolising and respecting their political nemesis in Kelantan (to the point they might not want to put a candidate in the coming by election), here is a tribute to the politician named Datuk Nik Aziz, the former Menteri Besar of Kelantan and also the Mursyidul Am of PAS (equivalent to Spiritual Leader). Below are a few most memorable quotes from him..

On Umno rejecting Islam and are not muslims, and how PAS had educated DAP in accepting hudud way better than Umno could:

“Harapkan UMNO nak ajak Islam lagu mana, dia sendiri tolak Islam. UMNO tolak Islam, nak dia perkenal Islam pada MCA dan DAP macam mana. Satu rahmat Cina Malaysia ini kerana Pas bersama DAP. Serangan DAP kepada Islam Alhamdulillah sekarang ini bertukar daripada langkah mayat kepada boleh berunding, Alhamdulillah kejayaan. Mana UMNO boleh buat.” Source.

Condemning all Umno members as rejecting Islam and won’t get any pahala (rewards) from Allah:

“Mereka tolak Islam. Tolak Islam, tolak agama Allah lah. Tuhan mana nak bagi pahala? Sebab mereka berbalah dengan Tuhan. Mereka sembahyang tak dapat pahala.” Source.

On rape:

“Dah dia buka aurat. Dirogol. Padanlah muka dirogol. Dia dok jual murah murah. Betis dia, muka dia, peha dia. Rogol lah! Peduli apa?” Source.

Defending Shahnon Ahmad and his book ‘SHIT’ for the usage of lewd profanities like “pu*imak”, “b*toh, hurled towards the then PM in 1999:

”Allah sendiri gunakan perkataan memaki, mencemuh atau mencarut, jadi manusia sendiri berpeluang menggunakan maki hamun tetapi terserahlah kepada manusia di mana tempatnya”. Source.

On who is better suited to be a leader of the country:

“Tiada sesiapa di muka bumi ini yang tahu menjaga dunia termasuk menguruskan soal budaya, ekonomi serta harta benda, melainkan ulama.” Source.

On smokers, or seemingly pious people who don’t follow religion: 

“Lembu yang berak di tengah jalan tidak boleh diambil tindakan undang-undang kerana tidak mempunyai otak dan fikiran. Tetapi manusia yang mempunyai otak sanggup melakukan perbuatan yang menyalahi agama dan kesihatan, apatah lagi dalam keadaan berpakaian melambangkan Islam. Maka, mereka yang melakukan perbuatan (menghisap rokok) itu dianggap lebih hina daripada lembu” Source.

On PAS getting helped by the anti-hudud DAP (even Satan) in facing the general elections in 1999:

“Siapa yang nak tolong kerajaan Islam, kami sebagai pemimpin Islam mesti terima sama ada DAP, MCA, dan MIC. Kalau nak tolong mengapa kita tolak. Jika DAP ikhlas nak tolong PAS, saya terima. Usahkan DAP, syaitan pun boleh saya terima.” Source.

In 1963, criticising the Alliance for partnering non-muslims in forming the Government:  
“Orang-orang Islam yang berkongsi dengan orang-orang kafir untuk memerintah negara, menjadi kafir atau haram.” Source.
In partnering DAP to face the general elections:
“Ini penting kerana kita juga mahukan sokongan dan undi bukan Islam dalam usaha memenangi pilihanraya umum akan datang.” Source.
While asking Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir to resign in 1999 claiming the PM is old and senile:
“Jika Mahathir letak jawatan pada hari ini, esok saya pula letak jawatan sebagai Menteri Besar Kelantan.” Source.
Al Fatihah.
Other quotes may refer to here and here.
Footnote: In 2002, Datuk Fadzil Noor the President of PAS passed away and in the subsequent by-election BN won the parliamentary seat. BN has always put a candidate and they never shied away from a by-election because they ‘respect’ their late adversary. If it was the other way around, no favours will be given from PAS towards BN. Not even a little respect. None was given by Nik Aziz towards Umno when he was alive. 


Why Umno leaders can’t seem to get it

A couple of days ago Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad wrote an article to highlight his complaints on the direction of this country, particularly to criticise the administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak. As a citizen of this country, and like everybody else, he has the right to criticise and give his views.

Basically, in his 34 paragraphed article, he outlined a few of those grievances. We are sure there are many, but perhaps these are the main ones (in 6 paragraphs only):

25. Apakah dianya yang saya fikir salah. Ia bermula dengan pendirian melayani semua tuntutan musuh. ISA dan undang-undang buang daerah dimansuh. Tindakan ini tidak sedikit pun mengurangkan tentangan oleh parti lawan. Sebaliknya jenayah bertambah dengan banyaknya kerana pembebasan ketua-ketua geng.

26. Demikian juga dengan sikap merendah diri kepada negara jiran sehingga urusan dalam negeri pun tertakluk kepada pendapat Kerajaan negara jiran. (JMD: this is pertaining Singapore, on how the way we develop Johor; our own state, and the high speed rail must take into account what Singapore wants)

27. Tetapi pendapat kaum dan parti yang kuat menyokong untuk menyelamatkan kedudukan Kerajaan tidak diberi layanan yang saksama.

28. Wang Kerajaan diguna untuk mempengaruhi sokongan rakyat apabila sahaja pilihanraya umum diadakan. Ini menjadikan rakyat terlalu bergantung kepada Kerajaan untuk segala-galanya. Bagi yang betul-betul miskin, bantuan seperti ini memanglah wajar. Tetapi beribu rakyat yang ditawar menolak bantuan wang seperti ini. Semangat rakyat untuk bekerja menjadi luntur apabila mereka diberi ganjaran tanpa apa-apa usaha oleh mereka. Semangat ini tidak akan menolong pembangunan Negara.

29. Dasar ekonomi mengutamakan tuntutan pengguna. Impot barangan digalakan dan industri tempatan diabaikan, bahkan dihalang oleh dasar Kerajaan.

30. Cuti ditambah sehingga adakalanya pekerja bercuti lebih satu minggu. Sebaliknya gaji minimum dinaikkan tanpa mengambilkira kenaikan kos yang boleh menjadi perniagaan dan perusahaan tidak bedayasaing dengan barangan impot.

31. Sesungguhnya banyaklah dasar, pendekatan dan perbuatan Kerajaan pimpinan Dato Seri Najib yang merosakkan hubungan antara kaum, merosakkan ekonomi dan kewangan negara.

32. Semua ini disebabkan penyokong Kerajaan tidak pernah menegur pemimpin.

The above are his grievances on how the policies and changes made by the PM is disastrous and have little benefit for the country as a whole.


Hishamuddin Hussein, a senior minister with an Umno VP post retorted with:

Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein has to come to the defence of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, saying he is doing his best in administering the country.

The defence minister cited accomplishments such as the handling of the remains from the MH17 tragedy, where he was quoted as saying by news portal Malaysiakini that Najib succeeded where US president Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin had failed.

“If Najib did not take the brave stand of facing the separatists, I may not be standing here today to organise the arrival of the corpses (of Malaysians),” Hishammuddin was quoted as saying by the portal.

“Ask if Obama could do it, ask if Putin is able to do it.”

Najib’s handling of the MH17 tragedy allowed investigators to access the crash site and bring back the remains of the MH17 victims.

What has MH17 got to do with the grave error in listening to the opposition calls to repeal the ISA? Do you know why the ISA is still needed? Because sometimes, when anti-opposition groups made unsavoury remarks towards the opposition, the opposition themselves want people who made those remarks to be treated under the ISA!

But the main point is, why isn’t the points made by Tun Mahathir are replied specifically? Is it because there are no replies forthcoming? Are the braincells incapable to think? This is precisely what Tun Mahathir had said in his article; when the most obvious mistakes are made the PM, the Umno leaders are incapable to criticise those mistakes.

And changes made if it is not beneficial to the society, it could be disastrous for the nation. Tengku Adnan, another Umno leader seemed not to get what Tun Mahathir had said.

“Give Najib a chance to make changes to bring the country forward. It takes time to make those changes,”

Yes ultimately, any PM wants to make a change. But if those changes are strategically disastrous (as mentioned by Tun Mahathir), then BN really do not need time. They really need a miracle to make things better.

The inability of Umno leaders to address each and every point made by Tun Mahathir is really comical. Not to mention the reply by Umno Federal Territory Youth Chief. The skill of saying something which addresses nothing is really being honed here. Again, if the changes prove to be a disadvantage for Barisan Nasional in surviving the next general election, there is no need to say that the PM is working hard to make these changes.

Umno Youth should just focus on making themselves attractive to GLCs. Who knows one day they may sit on the Tender Committee Board and dish out tenders for friends? If there’s a way to use a shortcut to get whatever you want in your political career, why not use it? Right?

But using a shortcut to reply on the points made by Tun Mahathir is really not an intelligent way to address the problems facing this country. If you couldn’t deal with simple questions by Tun Mahathir, how do you expect people to believe you can handle more complicated problems facing us?

As a conclusion, no hard feelings. Maaf zahir dan batin.


Solar panels on roads

We find this new technology and idea very refreshing, innovative and not to mention will help reduce costs and increase environmental health.

This, and other forms of renewable energy is the way to go for the future.


Letter from a reader on the ‘Allah’ imbroglio

The curious case of (the maybe) mad grab for political power in Sarawak (and perhaps Sabah, too)

By Ruhayat X

I didn’t want to say anything about the Allah issue since there are too many idiots on both sides as it is. But then the Klang church decided to conduct their BM services using Allah, but not their Tamil and English ones. I found that curious. And enlightening.

Because the word for God in Tamil is not Allah?

News flash: neither is it in Malay.

A question of motives
I question the motive and the timing. I will argue that the motive is dictating the timing, as we will see later. For now:

The argument that has become a familiar refrain is that the Christian natives of Sabah, Sarawak and Indonesia have been using Allah to refer to God for generations. Well, then, I’m sorry to say, but for those very generations, they have been terribly misled by their shepherds.

To bow to Allah is like bowing to Krishna. Both heretical gods to Christians.

Or as a Christian commenter to a blog put it:

“Allah is not simply the Arabic word for “god” – the word Allah in pre-Islamic times referred to the Moon God in the Arabic pantheon of gods. To suggest that Jews insert “Allah” instead of the words which we do use (HASHEM, etc.) is blasphemy in and of itself. We might as well use the word Zeus or Shiva! (…) His name is not, by any stretch of the imagination, “Allah”.”

It seems the bibles should indeed be amended to reflect the truth, yes, but that truth is not what they might think it is.

When Allah is not god
Perhaps a brief appreciation of semiotics and etymology?

In England, Hoover is a brand that has become so ubiquitous it is sometimes used as hoover – small h – as a noun to mean vacuum cleaners, or a verb (to hoover) to mean vacuuming. Here, Colgate became the same. Malay to child: “Gi kedai beli colgate skek” – meaning, any toothpaste will do, not just Colgate.

Now observe:
The Malays will sometimes say Tuhan when what they mean is Allah. “Tuhan je yang tahu” – in their hearts, they think of Allah.

But it is NEVER used the other way. The Malays would never use Allah as a catch-all for Tuhan. I have never heard a single Malay say, “Orang Buddha pun ada Allah. Allah dalam agama Buddha kata…” Never.

So I said, the Christian natives have been badly led astray. Lead them back to the straight path. Teach them: it’s Tuhan, not Allah.

An Arabic God, then?
You may then want to argue about the Arab etymology of the noun Al-Lah. The God. A seemingly generic term. So you want to transfer the language specific to the usage in one community, into quite a foreign context, thinking the same meaning ought to apply. How colonial.

But it doesn’t matter – you are on the side of the righteous. So you suddenly champion the voice of a renowned international Muslim cleric, who says Allah is a universal entity and all humanity can use his name. Fair enough. But my advice then is this: if you wish to take the words of clerics from foreign realms, than take the whole of their decrees, not only whenever it suits you.

Take what they say about the universal usage of Allah if you must, but don’t reject their words once they start imposing syariah on you. Cherry-picking to suit arguments ain’t the traits of a learned person.

But another big but
We borrow again from a Christian source to share with you this revelation: that Allah is not the generic term for God. Viz:

“In summary, ArabBible uses the definite, common noun, “al-ilaah” to refer to God, rather than the Islamic proper noun, “Allah”. We believe this is based on good Biblical and linguistic precedents.

Yet know that in Islam the different realms have traditionally been governed by indigenous authorities who have autonomous power. That’s why our laws have some variations, to take into account the special needs and traditions of a given people and their environment.

Thus, without denying the authority of Yusuf Qardawi, I stand by argument that the term “Allah” has specific meaning to the Malays different than in the Middle Eastern context. We have Allah, and we have Tuhan. Whereas to the Arabs, Muslim or otherwise, Allah is Tuhan is Allah.

Educate yourself a little. Read the Quran and see what characteristics this Allah – who calls himself such – ascribes himself. And then know what the Malays mean when they say “Allah”.

Christians who deny Allah
We’ve already had the strange phenomenon of non-Muslims suddenly championing a Muslim cleric to state the case for Allah. You realise it works just as well the other way around, too, right?

“The names of Allah reveal him as a distinct entity. Likewise, the names of the God of Israel, reveal Him as a distinct entity. The conclusion is that the two beings do not agree in their names and therefore do not agree in their personalities, purposes, character, attributes or essence.
–2008 Hannah Henderson
Hannah Henderson is an ordained minister and writer for Heavenly Manna.”

And I did say, didn’t I, that if you use Allah instead of Tuhan, your akidah sudah terpesong. This is from another Christian personality:

““Allah is an extremely powerful demon. He is a demon God. What Muslims are worshiping is actually a demon. They think they are worshiping God, they’re deceived, they’ve been fooled, so I don’t want to be hard on them, the Muslims have been fooled, they’ve been lied to, they’ve been deceived, they think they are worshiping the true God but they are worshiping a demon-god, this is according to the New Testament.”

See? Now set ’em back on the right path, Good Paderi Andrew, saviour of Christian souls!

And Allah for all…
While he’s on his crusade, we’re sure Paderi Andrew will sooner or later demand changes to both the Rukunegara and Negaraku, too. Yes?

Kepercayaan kepada Allah?

Rahmat bahgia, Allah kurniakan?

I will, however, accept the universal usage of Allah once the Vatican starts using it to refer the true God. Allah only for BM and Iban speakers? That’s hardly universal.

You know, if the Klang church had conducted services in all languages using the single term “Allah”, we wouldn’t even need to have this discussion.

It’s even stranger because a book store near my place plays Islamic ceramahs in Tamil all the time and guess what, they use Allah every time. So Allah exists in Tamil. Just not in church. And this is “universal”. Uhuh. Now we have to question the motive. Now we ask, wait, hang on a sec, what’s really going on?

The question of why
Christian natives in Sabah and Sarawak have been using Allah for ages with no big drama, nor does it raise even an eyebrow of their Muslim or other fellow citizens. So why now? And why such vehement insistence to extend its use on the Peninsula? For the sake of migrant Borneans? But they have been migrant here in drives for ages, too!

I can’t speak for all the Malay Muslims out here but frankly, I don’t like the stink of the motives. I don’t think he is sincere in wanting to use the “universal term” of Allah. I do think our pastor is dabbling in some pretty unChristian behaviour here.

So far there has been no big reaction from Putrajaya other than “Keep Calm And Remain Sane”. But whatever I might think of the Ah Jib Gor administration, I think he knows that the damage control he needs to do is not here in Semenanjung. But over there in Sarawak, and Sabah.

Because when you reflect on it to its logical conclusion – why is this happening = who profits the most out of it? – this is what the whole Allah campaign seems to be really about:

It hides the wedge of a knife into the BN honeypots of East Malaysia.

To risk disunity to wrest power, now that takes some special kind of crazy, don’t you agree.

How to fiddle in Rome
The tragedy is that could it be that Muslims are being pitted against Christians ostensibly so that some people could shake Sarawak, and maybe Sabah, and take power at the next General Election? If so, see what some people would do just to come to power.

At the Tuol Sleng in Phnom Penh I first observed, how evil could be so mundane. A torture prison set up in the ordinary precincts of a school. Can you imagine? It’s hard to as you stroll through the leafy walkway outside. It’s just a school. Until you see the rows and rows of faded black and white photos of the men, women and children who had been “processed” through it.

This is true also of Machiavellian politics. They make you think of some grand agenda, a clash of civilisations, something romantic.

But in the centre of it lies something so mundane: a simple political power play.



The sly christian priests and the naïve muslims

It is tiring to educate people on the issue of “kalimah Allah”. And it is even more exhausting to think that we have to explain to certain group of muslims on why the word ‘Allah’ should not be used by christians here.

Muslims in general, if they had known the real reason on why here in Malaysia it is offensive for christians to use it, they should not be supporting a church in Selangor who remained recalcitrant and arrogant in continuing the use of the word Allah in their hymns and masses.

Even people like Marina Mahathir and her like minded muslims friends are too ignorant and could not fathom the reason on why christians here in Malaysia should not use the word Allah in the face of the majority of Malaysians. And who are the majority of Malaysians? The muslims of course.

So here is the answer from a renown scholar by the name Dr. Zakir Naik. The answer gets interesting after the 2.30 minute mark. This is 9 minute video in which the muslims and the christians should watch:

Basically, what Dr Zakir is saying, christians can use the word Allah – but if you associate Allah (the one True God) with Jesus Christ or the Trinity, then you are ‘kufur’. Why would us muslims want to permit ourselves to become kufur just like the christians?

Why would Marina Mahathir, who worships Allah S.W.T. whereby Allah that she worships does not have a son, and certainly have got nothing to do with the Holy Spirit, is crying on top of her lungs to defend the christians on their right to equate Allah with Jesus, or Allah with the Holy Spirit?

Now this is why it is offensive for muslims (except for some muslim politicians and the more liberal muslims) to see the christians using the word Allah in their christian and sermons.

Those liberal muslims are so naive in their freedom of speech and religion of other people they forgot what effect this will have on muslims here.

The christians in Malaysia especially in Selangor have never used the word Allah in any of their prayers before. We at this blog have never met any of our christian friends who had prayed to Allah all this while. And apparently, not all christian churches in Malaysia agreed to use the word Allah in their mass. To them, Allah as a God is a different concept altogether from their own understanding of God – Yahweh, Jesus Christ etc.

If you are christian and reading this, do you use Allah in any of your prayers? Unless of course you are that small part of East Malaysians who actually used the word Allah in their bibles over there. But that is another matter which will be discussed later below.

But first, what is the agenda of this one Father Lawrence Andrew who insisted that christians in Selangor must be given the right to use the word Allah? Why is he so insensitive to jeopardise the harmonious relationship between muslims and christians over here? Christianity teaches blatant disregard towards tolerance and

If Father Lawrence himself never prayed to Allah all these years, it will be hypocritical for him to start now. It does not matter if he lamely stated that just recently, his flock has many East Malaysians now. Is he saying that being tolerant towards the sensitivities of muslims in Selangor takes a back seat over the need of much smaller community?

There should be give and take when looking at the bigger picture.

The other problem besides the muslims giving permission for other people to equate Allah towards something the He is not (syirik), is the potential fraud and subterfuge that comes with the use of Allah in Christianity.

This was somewhat shown in one of the previous article “Worshiping Jesus in Islam”. This time, the covert Christian evangelicals and their tactics can even be read openly in their portals such as the article “Son and The Crescent” in the Christian Today portal, as well as in the article “Case for God“. The links provided in latter has examples on the proselytisation of muslims into christians.

The evangelicals use tactics which they term as Conceptualisation and Localisation when preaching christianity to muslims. They use terms and jargons familiar with the muslims in the effort to convert them. To cut the story short, that is the reason why the malay bibles exist today with the word ‘Allah’ transcribed into them instead of the word ‘Tuhan’ which is a more logical translation for God.

Ultimately, the christians in East Malaysia during the British era was taught the bible using the bibles from Indonesia and this is what the Father Lawrence and Marina Mahathir is frighting today – that the christians in East Malaysia have used the word Allah in their bibles for centuries, which incidentally, this argument is based on the wrong facts and entirely founded on the grounds of subterfuge propagated by the christian missionaries a couple of centuries ago. How unfortunate.

Below is the video by christians, for the christians on how they covertly change their proselytisation technique to suit every culture they come across. What these evangelicals want it to spread Christianity and Jesus Christ around the world.

This deception and double-dealing is something that is real which muslims must be wary about. We have enough agitators which want nothing more than to see chaos and racial upheaval in Malaysia so that they can benefit from it one way or another. Does Father Lawrence want to see this happen by remaining stubborn and wilfully defiant?

Even an imam (Imam Muhammad Musri) from in the USA recently wrote something in Huffington Post recently. Although he is quite ignorant in his article especially pertaining to the real happenings here in Malaysia, he did mention about the stealth of christians in trying to proselytise muslims:

Screen Shot 2014-01-09 at 7.42.25 PM

His only ignorance is when he thought the word ‘Allah’ is the right term for ‘God’ among Malaysians. Which is definitely not true. The right term for God is Tuhan. For Malaysians, Allah is an arabic word recognised only by muslims as God.

But as  Muhammad Musri said above, fraud (stealth proselytisation) deserves appropriate penalties (which obviously is stated in our own Constitution) and it is up to the muslims to defend themselves against these tricksters.

As a conclusion, there are two fronts on why the muslims are against the word ‘Allah’ being used by the Christians:

1) they do not want to be an accomplice when some people equate Allah for something He is not, and;

2) the element of trickery evidenced by the centuries of proselytisation methods among the evangelicals towards the unsuspecting muslims.

If you are a muslim and your iman is strong, congratulations. But there are many muslims out there who are ignorant and not strong enough to counter the onslaught from some christian missionaries whose sole objective is to bring the muslims to embrace christianity.

If you have not listened to what Dr Zakir Naik said in the video above, please do so. It will give you some comprehension on the subject. And please watch the second too. Thank you.