It seems Tun Ling Liong Sik has the upper hand

In the previous article we have read how President Barack Obama sounded so happy in his statement about the TPPA. Bordering gloating, he said that the signing of the TPPA with other 11 Asia Pacific nations will greatly benefit American interests and help put American well-being first.

The USA has the upper hand in this. Their White House website even published a detailed framework on how the TPPA will greatly enhance America’s global trade presence; to the detriment of the other Asia Pacific participants.

Without the detailed content being provided by our own minister in charge, we can conclude that by signing the TPPA, it will only make the President of the USA a very happy man indeed. Only the most wretched would want our Parliament to ratify the TPPA without the public even having a glimpse at the details. Again, we are at a disadvantage.

And MTEM is right, there is no point in debating the TPPA in Parliament.

On a domestic political front, a recent news about Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik agreeing to the calls that PM Najib must step down did not go well with the regime.

Tun Dr Ling was reportedly saying:

“I agree with Mahathir. Because he has taken people’s money and put it in his own personal accounts,” Dr Ling was quoted as telling reporters after attending an event at Tunku Abdul Rahman University College here.

According to the report, the MCA man was asked if he agreed with Dr Mahathir’s demand for Najib to resign from office.

Dismayed by the lack of loyalty by Tun Dr Ling, PM Najib issued a statement asking for an apology for the alleged defamation otherwise, he will sue the retired MCA president.

It is peculiar that the MCA president was castigated and asked to apologise and be threatened with litigation when the original source of the issue, The Wall Street Journal and Sarawak Report were not even sued. In fact, the lawyers meekly asked reassurances from WSJ not to invoke some protective laws before they could even begin to think about seriously having an inclination to decide, whether or not they will proceed with the intention to sue.

But from the money trail as alleged by WSJ and Sarawak Report below, it is clear that some RM42 million from SRC International did go into Najib’s personal bank accounts.

The money trail

The money trail as alleged by WSJ and Sarawak Report

This is confirmed by MACC themselves in their statement:

“Referring to media reports regarding investments by SRC International Sdn Bhd, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission has gone through the issue and found elements that were raised fall under the MACC’s jurisdiction,” MACC deputy chief commissioner (operations) Datuk Seri Mohd Shukri Abdull said in a statement.

“Following the check that was done, it is found that there is basis for the MACC to begin investigations under the MACC Act 2009, and hence, an investigation has since been started.

“In line with legal provisions, the MACC will conduct investigations independently and professionally and comprehensively,” he added in the brief three paragraph statement.

SRC International was the subsidiary of 1MDB before it was parked under MOF beginning January 2012. The fact that two people associated with the case, Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil and Datuk Suboh Mohd Yassin had both fled the country, despite being wanted by the MACC for assistance in the investigation, speaks volume.

It seems, SRC’s sole funding came from the RM4 billion they borrowed from Kumpulan Wang Amanah Pencen (KWAP) back in 2011.

And on record, only up to RM216 million out of RM4 billion was used by SRC International for its business activities in Mongolia. Questions were posed as to what happened to the remaining amount.

We believe should Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik bring this matter to court, then the lawyers suing him must give evidence that indeed public money did not finally enter into PM Najib’s personal accounts.

MACC will have to expedite their investigation on the RM42 million fiasco and their findings must be brought into the trial.

Should the judiciary is brave enough, this can either bring back credibility to the government, or further strengthen Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik’s aforementioned opinion.

But there are many ways to skin a cat. Tun Dr Ling can simply apologise in order not to incur further costs, or the PM’s lawyers can retract the lawsuit in order not to risk a trial, both parties can settle the matter quietly and amicably, or this matter can indeed proceed to the courts.

Regardless, the Tun appears to have the upper hand in this. Because if it was indeed untrue, Najib would have long sued Sarawak Report and the Wall Street Journal.

You might also want to read:

1) Our current economic position?

2) Why so fast to sue Ling but not WSJ, asks Kit Siang

3) The Umno dilemma, where no one’s position is truly safe

4) Kerana Ini Gani Patail Di Ugut?

5) Lessons From Zimbabwe, the Philippines and Togo

6) RM2,600 juta: Mana bukti perbelanjaan untuk Umno?

7) Where is the balance of RM2.6 billion donation, Muhyiddin asks Najib

8) MACC and Bank Negara hunting down 1MDB-SRC International fugitives?

What is the TPPA, according to the Americans

Statement by the President on the Trans-Pacific Partnership

October 5, 2015

“I’ve spent every day of my presidency fighting to grow our economy and strengthen our middle class. That means making sure our workers have a fair shot to get ahead here at home, and a fair chance to compete around the world. My approach to trade has been guided by a unifying principle: leveling the playing field for American workers and businesses, so we can export more products stamped Made in America all over the world that support higher-paying American jobs here at home.

Over the summer, Democrats and Republicans in Congress came together to help the United States negotiate agreements for free and fair trade that would support our workers, our businesses, and our economy as a whole. When more than 95 percent of our potential customers live outside our borders, we can’t let countries like China write the rules of the global economy.We should write those rules, opening new markets to American products while setting high standards for protecting workers and preserving our environment.

That’s what the agreement reached today in Atlanta will do. Trade ministers from the 12 nations that make up the Trans-Pacific Partnership finished negotiations on an agreement that reflects America’s values and gives our workers the fair shot at success they deserve.

This partnership levels the playing field for our farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers by eliminating more than 18,000 taxes that various countries put on our products. It includes the strongest commitments on labor and the environment of any trade agreement in history, and those commitments are enforceable, unlike in past agreements. It promotes a free and open Internet. It strengthens our strategic relationships with our partners and allies in a region that will be vital to the 21st century. It’s an agreement that puts American workers first and will help middle-class families get ahead.

Once negotiators have finalized the text of this partnership, Congress and the American people will have months to read every word before I sign it. I look forward to working with lawmakers from both parties as they consider this agreement. If we can get this agreement to my desk, then we can help our businesses sell more Made in America goods and services around the world, and we can help more American workers compete and win.”

Congratulations to all the 11 nations in Asia Pacific that are on the verge of looking after the Americans’ interests and well being. They are Japan, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Thank you for the job well done.

Read more here, on how the TPPA will help Americans to “rewrite the rules of trade to benefit America’s middle class.” Because if they don’t, “competitors who don’t share our values, like China, will step in to fill that void.”

Question to the leaders of the Asia Pacific countries who will sign the TPPA: If the American strategy of the TPPA is to protect the American big corporations’ products domestically and to push it into other foreign countries ubiquitously, how will the TPPA help the products from those foreign countries to enter the local American market?

Taken from the White House’s website:

The Trans-Pacific Partnership
What You Need to Know about President Obama’s Trade Agreement

Writing the Rules To Support American Jobs

America’s trade policy may seem remote and technical, but it has a significant impact on the strength of our economy and the lives of millions of Americans. If the businesses you buy from everyday also sell their products to customers abroad, they are more likely to expand and support jobs here at home.

Why is that? Ninety-five percent of the world’s consumers live outside our borders. Our Made-in-America products and services are in demand, making American exports a vital pillar of our 21st century economy. In fact, exports played an indispensable role in America’s resurgence from the Great Recession. So, when the rules are fair, Americans can out-compete anyone in the world.

Last year, we broke the record in American exports for the fifth year in a row, selling $2.34 trillion in goods and services abroad. And here’s why that’s important: The more we sell abroad, the more higher-paying jobs we support here at home.

And those jobs tend to pay Americans better, meaning companies that export pay up to 18% more than companies that don’t.

But right now, our current trade policy — the status quo — puts our workers and businesses at a disadvantage, with higher costs for American goods, more barriers to trade, and lower standards for workers and the environment abroad than we have at home.

That is why President Obama has concluded negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership and will now work with Congress to secure its passage into law. The TPP is a trade agreement with 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific, including Canada and Mexico that will eliminate over 18,000 taxes various countries put on Made-in-America products.

With the TPP, we can rewrite the rules of trade to benefit America’s middle class. Because if we don’t, competitors who don’t share our values, like China, will step in to fill that void.

That is why the President’s trade policy is the best tool we have to ensure that our workers, our businesses, and our values are shaping globalization and the 21st century economy, rather than getting left behind.

Good luck, rest of the world.

You might also want to read:

1) What is in the TPPA?

2) Tun Mahathir in Sabah

3) Keadaan negara kita

4) The worst trade deal for the participating countries

5) No confidence vote

6) Stiglitz on TPPA : The US is committed to a lack of transparency

#new-economic-model, #reference, #tppa

What RM2,600 million can do to you

"Umno is the only government that fights the Jews"

“Umno is the only government that fights the Jews”

The Jews praises Najib

A few weeks later, the Jews praises Najib for being friendly towards them

This is typical Najib. He and his administration and the people around him have shown the world that hypocrisy is indeed the best policy. Throw in buckets full of dishonesty, then we can already sum up what is known as the Najib Leadership.

It’s like hearing him said that he will not endorse the Red Shirt rally a week before it happens but immediately after, not only he endorsed it, he also praised and congratulated the rally organisers.

It’s like when he said that Umno is not involved in sponsoring the rally, but its divisions were issued orders to ferry people into the city. Even Felda settlers were not left in peace. They were herded to attend the rally as well.

It’s like the time when Najib in March this year have asked us to wait for the AG report to know if any wrongdoing in 1MDB had occurred but when it was submitted, the AG Report was not made public.

It’s like the time when 1MDB said they will give cooperation for the investigations against them, yet the PAC told the media that 1MDB was withholding documents from the Auditor General.

Not to mention the time when Arul Kanda, hiding behind his silly smile denied 1MDB had done any misconduct, yet the main players of 1MDB had run off and hid in foreign countries. They refused to return home and be subjected to investigations; acting like fugitives who had escaped after they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

For the past several weeks, is there any actual investigation being done on 1MDB? Of course not. The lack of urgency to investigate the wrongdoings in 1MDB does not deter the government at all. In fact, they try to delay it as long as they can. The latest rumour is, even PAC will stop investigating 1MDB once the Parliament is convened to re-populate the previously decimated PAC. Najib in September made a statement to give him another 6 months to solve 1MDB woes. This was on top of the original 6 months he had asked back in June. This effectively will white wash 1MDB of any financial mismanagement.

It’s like the time when Najib issued a statement that a Special Task Force has been set up to investigate the RM2,600,000,000 that went into his personal bank account but a month after that, had effectively disbanded the said Task Force by sacking and transferring the people investigating him. Some stooge even went great lengths to say that the Task Force was illegal to begin with, forgetting the fact that Najib himself had issued a statement about its existence.

It’s like when Najib told the public that he will sue Wall Street Journal on the immediate Tuesday after they had published the damning story, only to be told that after several Tuesdays, his lawyers just wanted to know if WSJ will invoke some protection laws against a potential litigation from Najib. If they won’t, only then they will proceed.

WSJ should just say, “sue us first if you think that our story – that you have received billions of money into your personal accounts is not true!”. Najib had said exactly that in the beginning, that there was no documented proof in the WSJ story and he will sue them. Regardless, all sundry know that the nonsensical hogwash that came from Najib’s legal team against WSJ are just theatrics. A comedy sketch meant for the paid audience.

Maybe we should add ‘comical’ as one of his shining leadership traits.

It’s like the time when Najib said 1MDB did not use people’s money to bail out 1MDB but conveniently forgotten that nearly a billion was used in the form of ‘standby credit’ to pay its loan interests. Not to mention the fact that it suffered more than RM600 million in losses for financial year 2014 and raked up some RM42 billion of needless liabilities which today did not bear any fruitful dividends.

It’s like the time when Najib said thank you to Haron Din for refusing to believe the WSJ story and for refusing to think that Najib could steal and put in billions of money into his personal bank accounts. Najib then reiterated that if he indeed wanted to do that, he wouldn’t do it in a Malaysian bank account.

In the end, it was proven that the money was indeed banked in into a Malaysian bank account. The lies that he had made blatantly to the public would have disqualified him to be the prime minister; at least on moral grounds, but the stooges and the sycophants around him did not bat an eyelid and continued to support him like a halfwit donkey braying for more lies and flip flopping statements.

This is what RM2,600,000,000 can do to you.

If you count a ringgit for every second in a day, it will take you almost 83 years to reach that gargantuan amount. If someone in 1957 had started counting it, he will only finish counting them in the year 2040!

That is how much money that Najib was holding in his personal account. Can somebody now imagine how much was the RM42 billions worth of liabilities needlessly amassed?

And remember the time when Najib claimed that he did not use the RM2.6 billion for personal gain? Were we given proof that indeed not a single sen was used for his personal use? Apart from the stooges and the sycophants that felt that Najib could have never, ever, ever, ever, lied to us all, we the people with brains would want to know the breakdown on the usage of the money in order to assure us that he had never embezzled the funds within his accounts. When can we have that evidence?

It’s like the time when his stooges said that the Umno Constitution provides for its presidents to receive donations through trustee accounts but when it was revealed that none of the top Umno leaders ever knew about these ‘trustee accounts’, they shifted the goalposts by saying that it is better for the president to park the money in his OWN PERSONAL ACCOUNTS than to be held by proxies!

Fiction writers really can’t compete with this kind of script. It seems, Umno does not have a proper banking accounts. And it seems personal bank accounts are safer than Umno’s own bank accounts!

Firstly, a trustee bank account with only one signatory and nobody else knew about it is actually a very private, a very personal bank account. This is a fact, no matter how absurd they want to lie about it.

Secondly, a public official receiving money and other form of gratifications is against the MACC law. If this occurs, it will be deemed as corruption. No two ways about it. He can thump his chest to say that it was for the general election but receiving it into his personal bank account is wrong based on the law because it has elements of corruption and embezzlement. He even said it in his speech back in 2012!

Thirdly, there is no use of redefining the money as ‘donation’. The fact that Najib is hesitant to reveal the source of these billions and why it was flushed into his personal accounts; the fact that he is not transparent as to how every sen of the money was used and how he blatantly stopped all investigations against him, have made him look like a guilty despot.

And lastly, when people are asking these questions, and if the answers are not satisfactory, they will ask further questions, or may repeat the questions again and again. This is not called the shifting of goalposts. Shifting of goalposts can only happen when one is defending something, in this case – Najib. You defend him by giving good answers. This is how you protect a goal. When you give flip flopping answers and lie to cover previous lies, this can be construed as shifting the goalpost. The examples given above are testament to all this absurdity.

The one doing the attacking i.e, the ones asking the questions and uncovering the lies can never shift the goalpost precisely because there is no goal to defend in the first place. The public is questioning the government led by Najib. The government can’t turn around and said ‘why did you change your questions’ or ‘this is just mere lies’ without substantiating any evidence to prove it otherwise. That is called arrogance.

Is the mantra “the day and age where government knows all and knows best is so long over” no longer applicable? Has the government really embraced hypocrisy, dishonesty, buffoonery and arrogance as its calling card?

By the looks of it, this is what the people have to live up with.

You might also want to read:

1) Race issues a diversion from 1MDB scandal, says ex-Special Branch deputy


3) UMNO kehilangan identiti, Najib tak mungkin mampu mengembalikannya

4) HOT ! Surat Terbuka Abdul Hamid Bador Kepada Kerajaan

5) Kenapa 1MDB perlu lagi 6 bulan?: Satu analisa ringkas masalah “cashflow mismatch” dan strategi “monetization” 1MDB

6) The uglier side of Umno

7) ‘Rotten fish’ syndrome in Umno

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters, #reference

1MDB – more questions on missing billions

After the Prime Minister ditched moderation in his leadership by supporting the racially charged ‘Malay Red Rally’ last Wednesday, he can kiss goodbye to his Global Movement of Moderates.

No wonder an MP has called the Prime Minister a hypocrite and a phony.

His own division leader, that uninspiring Jamal Yunos of Sungai Besar sees nothing wrong with Umno members hurling insults such as ‘cina babi’ towards members of the press.

With this kind of loyal yet stupid sycophants propping up Najib Razak’s image, it is no longer a suprise that his leadership is getting rather strenuous and desperate. Not to mention having zero credibility in the eyes of both domestic and international masses.

This kind of unethical leadership, bordering on the belligerent, has rubbed of 1MDB in their business dealings.

For the past week, the Wall Street Journal has written two serious exposés on missing billions. The first is a missing USD1.4 billion which was supposedly remitted by 1MDB to IPIC for collateral over the now abandoned power plant partnership between them.

The second was today when it is revealed that another USD993 million was not received by IPIC when 1MDB presumably had paid them in November 2014.

1MDB’s immediate reaction is to criticise WSJ for using confidential information, and for using unidentified sources as informants and also to stand by its audited accounts.

To attack WSJ for using confidential is rather stupid since this strengthen their story that all the information received were indeed credible.

To use WSJ’s unidentified sources against them is unwise too since some ministers who had attacked WSJ using the same argument when news of billions went into the Prime Minister’s accounts were proven true. WSJ had provided verified documents as evidence and this had left those sycophantic ministers humiliated and exposed them as nothing more than a mindless stooge of the Prime Minister.

"Don't ask me, I wasn't there!"

“Don’t ask me, I wasn’t there!”

And to say that 1MDB stood by Deloitte’s audit report can be pointless against the allegations since Deloitte could not confirm whether IPIC did receive the amount. Deloitte indeed did not audit IPIC financial account.

What they could only do is to send an intercompany confirmation of balances (in the case of debtors or creditors). If the third party company did not return the confirmation form to Deloitte, there is nothing they can do to confirm if the amount tallies or existed.

If the confirmation is pending or left unanswered right before the auditor signed off the accounts, they will only insert this as a note in the audit findings report. Audit findings report is a list of accounting violations or failure in internal controls which are submitted to management of a company. It is not a publicly available report such as the final audit report meant for shareholders and public.

To digress, usually the auditor handling all these intercompany confirmations is a junior auditor. At most a senior audit executive. He/she then will report to the audit field supervisor or a senior in charge, who in turn, reports to an audit manager. An audit manager, will have to sweat through the ordeal of submitting his team audit to the audit partner – the one ultimately signing off the audit report.

Therefore, to say that Deloitte’s audit report is 100% following audit methodology and should be 100% free of fraud is a misdirection altogether.

What 1MDB should have done is to get their former business partner in crime to issue a statement of denial. Is it so difficult for IPIC to issue such statement? To deny altogether what WSJ had published. To clearly show that indeed they have received a total of USD2.4 billions (USD1.4B + USD1B) and it is all recorded in their financial statements.

But IPIC itself under internal investigation of their own. The bosses highly associated with 1MDB, Khadem al Qubassi and Mohamed al Husseiny were removed in April and August respectively.

To cap off this debacle, WSJ had also revealed that Deloitte will not sign 1MDB audit report unless someone would have guaranteed the USD2.32 billion worth of ‘investment’ in the Cayman Islands. These investments were indeed worthless which in they end, on top of needed to be guaranteed, they were also classified as third tier assets in 1MDB’s 2014 accounts.

Enter IPIC, the ever willing partner to the rescue. Otherwise there will be a huge hole in the 1MDB accounts. We wonder what is the price for getting IPIC to guarantee such amount.

That USD2.32 billion could not stand on their own as Deloitte had some problem ascertaining their real value. Furthermore, it is not in the form of cash.

The previous auditor, KPMG was sacked precisely because they refuse to sign the accounts over this matter.

The initial amount of money had disappeared during the PetroSaudi – 1MDB joint venture which was terminated in 2010. It was initially a USD1.83 billion of cash which was pumped into PetroSaudi for a period of two years since 2009 under the pretext of loans to PetroSaudi.

Not sure what kind of units are they because as a minister, I have no idea

Not sure what kind of units are they because as a minister, I have no idea. Please don’t ask me tough questions.

This money changed in nature many times and revalued upwards between themselves to the final amount of USD2.32 billion. Ultimately, even the Finance Minister 2 could not answer properly what is the nature of this investment.

In total, there are USD4.23 billion (USD1.83B + USD1.4B + USD1B) suspiciously missing at the moment, amounting to approximately RM16 billion of Malaysian money.

We are now getting bits and pieces of information regarding the RM42 billion of loans unaccounted for. And it is sad that the truth came about from third party and documents from suppressed investigations. We wonder what information the public could have gotten if the investigation teams were not dismantled.

Will somebody stand up and be responsible for this financial fiasco?

You might also want to read:

1) Auditor only closed 1MDB’s books after UAE firm guaranteed US$2.32b in Caymans

2) Isu Deposit USD1.4 bil – Dalam Nota Penyata IPIC Pun Tidak Disebut Tentang Deposit!

3) Satu Lagi Bom Dari WSJ – Duit Tebus Option USD993 Juta Tidak DiTerima IPIC!


5) The chronology of 1MDB’s suspicious joint venture

6) Bekerja keras melindungi penyelewengan 1MDB

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters

The uglier side of Umno

It is comical to see the Prime Minister acting all surprised and touched by the turn out of the ‘Malay Red Rally’ yesterday.

This pre-meditated theatrics did not go unnoticed by the public. Note that only last week he said that Umno is not endorsing the rally.

But the rally itself was organised by Umno stalwarts, attended by Umno deputy ministers and at least one minister, and where Umno members from all over the peninsular were instructed to go and ferried into the city. Yet, the Prime Minister had the gall to be ‘overwhelmed’ by the support?

If there is a prime case of manufacturing your own propaganda and believing it too much, then this is it.

The public knows that the rally was organised under the pretext of shoring support for the embattled Prime Minister. Those who came were largely malays from the Umno party. Basically, less than 2% of Umno’s 3 million members went to Padang Merbok yesterday.

Are the sycophants now patting themselves on the back for delivering the rented supporters to this staged rally for the Prime Minister? However, a few supporters complained they did not get the money they were promised. Hopefully they did get it like the rest of the mob.

It is a pity that instead of celebrating diversity on Malaysia Day, Umno chose to organise a racially charged demonstration that hurled abuse and profanity to the non-malays, particularly the chinese.

In the previous article ‘The Ugly Side of Umno’, we did mention how Umno do not know how to be attractive to voters. And the rally yesterday had shown that they are totally clueless in scoring brownie points from the public.

We wrote:

Conservatively, about 150,000-strong crowd had gathered in the course of two days to protest against him. But the first initial reaction from Umno is that these people are DAP members and they must be ridiculed, censured and verbally attacked.

They never saw the need to see these people as voters. It is definite that not everyone who gathered during that protest is a DAP member. They are ordinary people. They have the power to vote in a government.

These voters were called shallow minded by the Prime Minister. He even called them as having poor sense of patriotism. Umno’s media propaganda even went on to label these people as traitors. Ironically, these are the same people that Umno and other BN parties had to canvass for votes during general elections.

Instead of taking the high road and address the demands of Bersih 4 two weeks ago, Umno  organised a counter rally to harangue the public.

No wonder two other main components of Barisan Nasional were dead set against this rally. MCA and MIC were against it claiming “that the timing of the rally is not right, and contains racial undertones. It can jeopardise racial relations and can affect economic growth due to the tension”.

Yet the BN Chairman cum-Prime Minister who is also the Umno President could only muster a meek ‘agree to disagree’ declaration during the coalition’s supreme council meeting. This is akin to another ‘agree to disagree’ fiasco among Pakatan Rakyat’s component parties on the issues of Hudud back in 2011.

What have ‘agree to disagree’ brought on to Pakatan Rakyat since then?

True enough, the rally was filled with instances of profanity, racial threats and violence.

Barisan Nasional, who had worked under the consensus system for the longest time, are being destroyed by someone who is facing leadership problems of his own; leading a lacklustre administration and condemned by domestic and international communities over his personal corruption scandal.

MCA and MIC are tasked in getting the non-malays to support Barisan Nasional yet Umno is trying very hard not to get the votes from these group of people. Former Umno presidents would have never condoned such rally. It will have a negative impact for the whole of Barisan Nasional. One must learn from history in order to be clear on this concept of power sharing and tolerance.

Even naming the rally as ‘Himpunan Maruah Melayu’ is a misnomer since those who attended are just  Umno supporters who have no qualms that their President have received RM2.6 billion in his personal bank accounts. In reality, the Umno malays are suffering a dent in their dignity when their ultimate leader is involved in such practice. They should be ashamed of themselves for showing support for this kind of leader. Their only saving grace is the fact that they are stupidly oblivious to how the greater majority (malays and non-malays alike) are looking towards them.

Smearing Malaysia Day with such rally just to hide the elephant in the room is a tactic of desperate men, afraid of losing power and position. Too bad they believe they are winning in the perception battle.

When the next general election comes, when the votes from non-malays dwindle to less than 5%, please do not squeak your shock with that pathetic ‘apa lagi cina mahu’ again when you should bloody well know why they will never vote you by then.

You might also want to read:

1) Rally was Umno’s ploy to divert attention from scandals linked to Najib

2) Is rally to restore Malay dignity, Najib’s flagging support


4) Lessons in Politics from Islam- Part 2

5) Derma RM2.6 Bil – Teori Kebetulan SRC


The ugly side of Umno

The problem with Umno these days is that they have no idea how to be appealing towards the general public.

When even the Prime Minister himself is using crude words to harangue and berate the public for showing displeasure towards him, Umno as a whole have lost the plot.

For instance, take last weekend’s Bersih 4.0’s street demonstration. Conservatively, about 150,000-strong crowd had gathered in the course of two days to protest against him. But the first initial reaction from Umno is that these people are DAP members and they must be ridiculed, censured and verbally attacked.

They never saw the need to see these people as voters. It is definite that not everyone who gathered during that protest is a DAP member. They are ordinary people. They have the power to vote in a government.

These voters were called shallow minded by the Prime Minister. He even called them as having poor sense of patriotism. Umno’s media propaganda even went on to label these people as traitors. Ironically, these are the same people that Umno and other BN parties had to canvass for votes during general elections.

Do these people who sang Negaraku in earnest looked like they don’t love the country?

You lambast and condemn them, yet at the time when you have to throw yourself in the mercy of the public, you beg for their votes; throwing huge sums of money here and there just to solicit support in order to remain as government.

This is the problem about Umno which has not been realised every single time Bersih hold their demonstrations. They jeopardise their own chances and, it is not surprising that the parliamentary seats won by BN in 2013 is fewer than in 2008.

No wonder MCA is getting tired of Umno’s petulant behaviour.

There was approximately 400,000 vote difference between BN and Pakatan in 2013 which Pakatan won on popular votes. That is about 3.5% difference.

Pakatan need less than 200,000 extra votes against BN to takeover the government, which could be translated to gaining another 23 seats to become a government. Currently, BN has about 25 seats which were won with under 2,000 majority votes indicating they are in a precarious position indeed.

If we are being conservative and multiply 100,000 people that went for Bersih with 3 (average number of voters in a family), that is already 300,000 votes lost by BN.

Coupled with millions of new voters registering between 2013 to 2017, where the majority are the youths which Umno had castigated for joining Bersih, then the signs are clear to see.

It is time for Umno to stop being a bully towards any critics when the solution is so simple. A couple of the people’s demands that attended Bersih are, ‘the resignation of the prime minister’ and ‘a more transparent government’. God knows, almost everyone we know are demanding for it.

These demands are justified and easy to fulfill. Everybody knows the prime minister’s position is already morally untenable. The whole world knows it. Never before Malaysians had come across such an embarrassing figure desperately continuing to pose as a leader.

It is ironic that the fate of Malaysians is actually beholden to the prime minister, his loyalists and several other Umno divisional chiefs. It is odd to have less than 200 people holding Malaysia in this kind of ransom-cum-political deadlock. The majority of people have spoken. Usually this entails a change in premiership.

Pak Lah was replaced not during a general election but after a strong message was conveyed by Malaysians about a year after the disastrous result.

Alas, with much stronger message sent to the prime minister; via demonstrations, to his own social media platforms, in the non-mainstream media and criticisms by global observers, it is remarkable to see how thick a skin can be. Umno should have been embarrassed to have a president like this.

However, Umno is paralysed to the core. The members cannot even make any constructive criticism without being labelled as a traitor by the prime minister’s many toadies, flatterers and minions.

Some Umno leaders stupidly said that its members must use the proper channel to air their grievances but everyone knows that criticism towards the leadership is no longer tolerated. Incidences where divisional leaders obstructed proposals from the grassroots which are not endearing enough by the party leadership is common.

With many bad examples to showcase Umno’s utter sycophancy towards a much maligned president, there is no way Umno can be appealing to the public anymore, let alone among the younger generation.

Umno Youth and Puteri Umno, the wings that will inherit the party once the current leadership is gone, will be stuck with a basket of rotten apples left by this leadership. Unless these young ones do something about this current malaise, then beyond 2018 there will be nowhere to hide from your own party members and the public.

You might also want to read:


2) MCA official quits post over differences with party

3) Rafidah Aziz to red-shirts: Just what are you trying to prove

4) More Uncertainty Ahead for the Country

5) Rally Behind Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad

6) Everything seems to be going badly for Malaysia, says Nazir Razak

7) Najib is riding on the tiger and unable to dismount

8) The March of the Yellow Shirted and Shallow Minded People



A leader who is an embarrassment to the country

We can now be fairly certain that the Prime Minister lacks the courage to face the crowd. Although he once said that “semangat kepahlawanan tetap ada dalam diri saya” (the warrior spirit will always be in me), he had skipped a ‘Nothing To Hide’ forum organised by his own people in early June and now had skipped the International Anti Corruption Conference held in our own country.

Reasons given varied from ‘security issues’ to ‘need to avoid being grilled’.

What a shame for this country when a Prime Minister is afraid to face tough questions. Journalists are already complaining why is he avoiding questions in press conferences too. His last PC which had allowed questions from journalists was in early July. He did not dare to take any questions even after the announcement of a new cabinet!

His proclamations and statements now come from his own blog and speeches made at events. The sad truth is, if a prime minister can’t be transparent enough to answer allegations head on, then what is the point of governing Malaysia?

Even the founder of Transparency International, Michael Hershman is disappointed with the absence of the Prime Minister, saying “I am disappointed that he wasn’t here because I had hoped he would used this as a platform to explain what happened, to tell the truth. He missed that opportunity.”

He also said that his “disappointment is an understatement” and the prime minister’s “credibility certainly has negatively affected by his inability to address this head on and to tell the truth”.

Meanwhile, the Chairman of Transparency International went a step further by saying that the RM2,600 million money in the prime minister’s personal bank accounts has the elements of grand corruption.

Adding, “he has not explained, for what and where the money came from and what he was to do when he received it. He must also prove that the money is not illicit or that it comes from an illicit source. Political parties should not receive money that comes from illegal origins”.

No wonder an Umno veteran, Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz lamented that it is embarrassing to have foreigners pointing out the wrongs which Malaysians are also pointing towards the prime minister.

To be clear, by receiving RM2,600 million into his personal back accounts, there were many instances that the prime minister may have breached the MACC Act. Especially section 17 and 23 of the said Act. Not to mention section 165, 405 and 409 of the Penal Code.

If action can’t be taken or seen to be taken against a prime minister who had broken a law, then perhaps it is acceptable for a CEO of a GLC to receive millions of money from vendors/clients into his own personal account and claim that it is a donation!

Regardless, how the money was given is equally important as to how it was spent. If it was for political funding, Umno have never received ‘donations’ through the personal bank account of its presidents. That would be breaching the laws stated above.

IMG_0183This crisis of confidence and the trust deficit came from the personal corruption crisis faced by the prime minister. Never before in history where the personal bank account of the prime minister are being investigated. Shooting his own foot in the process, he sacked people who are investigating and questioning him and dismantled the investigation teams. And replaced them with loyalists and yes-men.

On top of that, he engineered delays in investigating 1MDB, a company which has so many problems it can’t even generate profits and pay back the massive loans it has needlessly acquired. It had to beg for debt forgiveness, use taxpayers money as standby credit and get an arab company to pay for them some of their debts in exchange for the prized assets.

This is the leader who had no qualms in lying to the people. Remember his statement immediately after Wall Street Journal published and exposed the billions in the PM’s bank accounts?

He said:

The latest allegation is that I have taken state-linked funds for personal gain. I believe Tun Mahathir, working hand in glove with foreign nationals, including the now discredited political attack blog Sarawak Report, is behind this latest lie.

Let me be very clear: I have never taken funds for personal gain as alleged by my political opponents – whether from 1MDB, SRC International or other entities, as these companies have confirmed.

At no point have those making these allegations offered any evidence. All we have heard is that these allegations are based on leaked documents and unnamed investigators. Not once has the source of these documents ever been shown, neither have the documents themselves been provided for verification by lawful authorities.

As proven later on, the allegations were proven to be true. He even slandered Tun Dr Mahathir as the person behind the allegations about his exposed personal bank account. Not only that, he defended himself by saying the allegations had no documents to substantiate the truth.

The money trail

The money trail

To add more spice in the guilt soup, some people from SRC International went into hiding to escape being remanded; when the prime minister could have easily called them back to help with the investigations.

Well the rest is history. The egg on the prime minister’s face was undeniably embarrassing.

One of the best parts came when Haron Din claimed that “it is unbelievable that someone transferred public funds into a personal account, if someone wants to cheat, they would have pumped it into a secret account”.

To which the prime minister thanked Haron Din for not believing WSJ’s story! He desperately wanted people to believe that no money was banked in into his accounts.

Lies after lies were perpetuated by his sycophants in order to defend their leader. But fortunately the public are smarter than all these sycophants combined. Too bad some people are still bent on supporting and defending a leader who had clearly misled the public. To many people, that in itself disqualifies him from being a prime minister.

The recent call by Zaid Ibrahim to get Malaysians of all across the political divide to prioritise the removal of this prime minister is seen as an appropriate plea to save Malaysia from further embarrassment.

It is not enough for the prime minister and his idiotic sycophants to give flip flopping answers on how the ‘donation’ was used. They must give proof on how the money was spent; a detailed list of each expenses and transaction made, to who and what was it for. Otherwise how would the public believe that every single sen was not used for personal gain? This is called accountability.

But he chose to remain silent about this and hide behind his abusive powers to sack and replace people for the sake of his political survival.

Journalists could not even reach him to get his response on the legal suit filed by an Umno member and also the latest legal suit by PKR for breaking the election laws. These are important litigation suits against a sitting prime minister/Umno president yet the public is appalled that he seems rather oblivious about them.

A good leader is one who is trusted by the people and one who deserves that trust. If the leader is not forthcoming and quick to tell the truth and be transparent, the trust is lost and he can never lead effectively. He is rendered irrelevant.

A politician can only lead when others accept him as their leader. When the prime minister no longer has the moral authority to lead, it is embarrassing to have him as a leader of this country.

You might also want to read:

1) IACC – Letak Jawatanlah Najib! Atau Memang Muka Tak Malu..

2) Legislative members, be responsible reps, initiate vote of no confidence

3) Najib should resign, says UN anti-graft coalition


5) Anti-graft organisation founder says Najib must come clean on RM2.6 billion donation

6) Najib’s Corruption Scandals Take The Lead At IACC Conference

7) PC turns farcical due to lack of evidence

#1mdb, #public-sector

Happy Independence Day, Malaysia!

Get Well Soon, Malaysia

It is amazing how the Prime Minister of Malaysia can unite thousands of people in order to free themselves from his leadership. It seems these people, some said close to 150,000 in the course of two days, had chosen to brave the hot sun and the rain just to show their displeasure towards him.

And this is all because of the problems which had arisen from the issues pertaining the RM2,600 million found in his personal bank accounts, the failures of 1MDB, the lethargic economy and his increasingly dictatorial leadership pathetically masked under the ‘moderate movement’ pretenses.

It is fortunate that no violent episode which frequently marred the previous three demonstrations had occurred. This is probably due to the absence of the chief provocateur who is currently languishing in jail. Nevertheless, a peaceful gathering of thousands should not be looked upon as inconsequential by the ruling coalition.

In fact, we can safely assume that the coalition has definitely lost the urban votes. And how about the grassroot support? Undeniably, they had lost about half the rural votes in the previous by-election which was held in a malay-majority constituency last May. Things are not doing well indeed. Especially since personal issues that dogged the prime minister have become more and more untenable.

The prime minister have cocooned himself within a wall of false comfort; choosing not to face the media since early July. Q & A sessions are no longer tolerated. The last he had was probably in that tiny mosque on the 5th of July 2015 telling the reporters that he might sue a foreign news agency for publishing lies about him receiving billions into his bank accounts. Since then, he had chosen to speak only on rostrums, to a captive audience, who are unable to ask questions, but to simply listen.

To the audience, he preached, he harangued, and he desperately want people to believe his plea of innocence and his self entitled proclamation that only he can lead Malaysia.

There were no more answering tough questions from the media regarding his personal issues. That task have been given to his many henchmen, who know next to nothing themselves.

If the prime minister is bent to keep on hiding behind the machinations that is frequently used to conceal his accountability to be answerable to the rakyat; where he is unable to bravely stand and tested under the rigorous laws that could be applicable to him, then surely there are no more moral grounds to stay in power.

It is sad that he has to drag the whole coalition just to defend his personal errors; deflecting the call for his resignation as an attack to the government. His own party is besieged with problems and support is quickly dwindling away due to the disappearing of integrity and the respect towards it.

It is even sadder that after 69 years in existence, his own party have lost the huge goodwill it had painfully obtained from the rakyat all through the decades just because he is too stubborn to see the problem.

The problem is him, yet he thinks he can provide solution to overcome this. He and his advisers think that through silencing his critics, sacking innocent people, crippling the institutions and appointing only loyal, unquestioning stooges, the problems will go away and support from the masses will miraculously re-appear.

Perhaps this is the burden the people will have to bear for the next 3 years. Unless of course, the people who can actually make a change will re-discover their principles and fortitude to actually do something about it.

Yes, get well soon Malaysia. Selamat Hari Merdeka.

Stay strong, with pride

Stay strong, with pride

You might also want to read:

  1. MERDEKA! Apa makna ‘MERDEKA’ pada anda?
  2. The darker the night, the nearer we are to the dawn
  4. Tun Mahathir – Apa Lagi Cara/Pilihan Yang Ada Untuk Rakyat Dapatkan Kebenaran?
  5. Muhyiddin: We need integrity and principles
  6. PM Is Reduced to Haranguing the Rakyat

Umno, politik wang dan undang-undang SPRM

Setiap sumbangan yang ingin diberikan kepada mana-mana parti politik samaada di peringkat pusat mahupun negeri, hendaklah disalurkan melalui akaun rasmi parti. Ini bagi mengelakkan ahli-ahli politik menyalahgunakan nama parti untuk meminta atau menerima apa-apa sumbangan yang kemudiannya diselewengkan untuk kepentingan persendirian. Setiap sumbangan yang dihulurkan perlulah dikemukakan resit penerimaan dan dimasukkan dalam akaun parti. Menerusi rekod penerimaan yang teratur ia boleh diaudit pada tiap-tiap akhir tahun kewangan. Kerajaan percaya inisiatif seumpama ini akan mengelakkan sebarang bentuk perbuatan rasuah dan penyelewengan..” – Najib Razak, 27 February 2012

“Do not resort to money or abuse of power, launch personal attacks and so on..” – Najib Razak, 21 September 2013

Dalam bahasa pasar, hampir pasti orang yang mendengar kata-kata di atas akan menjawab dengan – “Perdana Menteri bercakap tak serupa bikin”. Ini kerana di dalam tahun 2013 juga, beliau telah menerima wang sebanyak RM2,600 juta di dalam akaun peribadinya. Umum disogokkan dengan cerita bahawa ianya digunakan untuk tujuan pilihanraya 2013.

Jika guru kencing berdiri, maka murid kencing berlari. Akhir akhir ini media disogokkan dengan keterangan dari pemimpin pemimpin Umno yang tidak segan silu menerima wang untuk hal-ehwal kepentingan politik mereka.

Contohnya pengakuan dari Pengerusi Majlis Ahli Parlimen Barisan Nasional (BNBBC) Tan Sri Shahrir Samad yang mengatakan penerimaan wang sebanyak RM1 juta dari akaun peribadi Perdana Menteri adalah perkara biasa, kerana itu adalah untuk menguruskan kawasan parlimen dan hal ehwal politik beliau!

Patutlah beliau beria-ia mempertahankan kemasukan RM2.6 billion ke dalam akaun peribadi Najib Razak hingga sempat untuk menjawab kritikan mengenainya.

Bagaimana mungkin seseorang terpelajar seperti Shahrir Samad dan Najib Razak tidak tahu akan undang undang negara Malaysia, terutamanya undang-undang pencegahan rasuah seperti tertera di bawah:

Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia 2009

Seksyen 16: Kesalahan menerima suapan

16. Mana-mana orang yang sendiri atau melalui atau bersama dengan mana-mana orang lain:-

(a) secara rasuah meminta atau menerima atau bersetuju untuk menerima bagi dirinya atau bagi mana-mana orang lain; atau

(b) secara rasuah memberikan, menjanjikan atau menawarkan kepada mana-mana orang sama ada bagi faedah orang itu atau bagi faedah orang lain

Seksyen 17: kesalahan memberi atau menerima suapan oleh ejen

17. Seseorang melakukan kesalahan jika:-

(a) sebagai seorang ejen, dia secara rasuah menyetuju terima atau memperoleh, atau bersetuju untuk menyetuju terima atau cuba untuk memperoleh, daripada mana-mana orang, untuk dirinya sendiri atau untuk mana-mana orang lain, apa-apa suapan sebagai suatu dorongan atau upah bagi melakukan atau tidak melakukan, atau kerana telah melakukan atau tidak melakukan, apa-apa perbuatan berhubungan dengan hal ehwal atau perniagaan prinsipalnya, atau kerana memberikan atau tidak memberikan sokongan atau tentangan kepada mana-mana orang berhubungan dengan hal ehwal atau perniagaan prinsipalnya; atau

(b) dia memberikan atau bersetuju untuk memberikan atau menawarkan apa-apa suapan kepada mana-mana ejen sebagai dorongan atau upah bagi melakukan atau tidak melakukan, atau kerana telah melakukan atau tidak melakukan apa-apa perbuatan berhubungan dengan hal ehwal atau perniagaan prinsipalnya, atau bagi memberikan atau tidak memberikan sokongan atau tentangan kepada mana-mana orang berhubungan dengan hal ehwal atau perniagaan prinsipalnya

“Suapan” ertinya –

wang, derma, alang, pinjaman, fi, hadiah, cagaran berharga, harta atau kepentingan mengenai harta, iaitu apa-apa jenis harta, sama ada alih atau tak alih, faedah kewangan, atau apa-apa manfaat seumpama itu yang lain

“ejen” ertinya –

mana-mana orang yang diambil kerja oleh atau bertindak bagi seorang lain, dan termasuklah pegawai badan awam atau yang berkhidmat dalam atau di bawah mana-mana badan awam, pemegang amanah, pentadbir atau wasi pusaka seseorang yang sudah mati, subkontraktor, dan mana-mana orang yang diambil kerja oleh atau yang bertindak bagi pemegang amanah, pentadbir atau wasi, atau subkontraktor itu

“pegawai badan awam” ertinya –

mana-mana orang yang menjadi anggota, pegawai, pekerja atau pekhidmat sesuatu badan awam, dan termasuklah anggota pentadbiran, ahli Parlimen, ahli sesuatu Dewan Undangan Negeri, hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Mahkamah Rayuan atau Mahkamah Persekutuan, dan mana-mana orang yang menerima apa-apa saraan daripada wang awam, dan, jika badan awam itu ialah suatu perbadanan seorang, termasuklah orang yang diperbadankan sebagai perbadanan itu

Ada yang mengatakan bahawa Najib Razak tidak bersalah kerana menerima derma tersebut kerana ianya adalah sedekah sumbangan dari Arab Saudi kepada beliau. Soalan yang patut ditanya adalah, jika Najib Razak bukan perdana menteri Malaysia, adakah beliau boleh mendapat hadiah wang sebanyak itu? Akta SPRM cukup jelas mengenai persoalan tersebut.

Seksyen 23: Kesalahan menggunakan jawatan atau kedudukan untuk suapan

23 (1) Mana mana pegawai badan awam yang menggunakan jawatan atau kedudukannya untuk apa apa suapan, sama ada bagi dirinya sendiri, saudaranya atau sekutunya, melakukan suatu kesalahan

Ada juga mengatakan bahawa Najib Razak tidak boleh dihukum sebagai menerima rasuah kerana ianya belum dibuktikan lagi (innocent until proven guilty). Walaubagaimanapun, Akta SPRM berpendapat seseorang itu telah melakukan rasuah jika menerima suapan (legal presumption) melainkan beliau membuktikan ianya bukan rasuah. Setakat menafikannya sahaja tidak mencukupi.

Seksyen 50: Anggapan dalam kesalahan tertentu

50 (1) Jika dalam mana-mana prosiding terhadap mana-mana orang atas kesalahan di bawah seksyen 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22 atau 23 adalah dibuktikan bahawa apa-apa suapan telah diterima…., suapan itu hendaklah dianggap telah diterima…. secara rasuah melainkan jika akasnya dibuktikan

Apakah hukuman penalti bagi kesalahan kesalahan di atas?

Ianya berbentuk seperti:

Seksyen 24 (1) Mana mana orang yang melakukan kesalahan di bawah seksyen 16, 17, 20, 21, 22 dan 23 apabila disabitkan boleh –

a) dipenjarakan selama tempoh tidak melebihi dua puluh tahun; dan

b) didenda tidak kurang daripada lima kali ganda jumlah atau nilai suapan yang menjadi hal perkara kesalahan itu jika suapan itu dapat dinilai atau berbentuk wang atau sepuluh ribu ringgit, mengikut mana mana yang lebih tinggi.

Pada awal Ogos yang lepas, SPRM telah mengesahkan bahawa wang RM2,600 juta tersebut adalah sesuatu derma. SPRM tidak pernah mengesahkan bahawa ianya bukan rasuah. Oleh sebab itu, siasatan masih dijalankan terhadap penerimaan derma tersebut.

Sudah sampai masanya untuk ahli-ahli politik di Malaysia untuk mengambil kursus mengenai rasuah kerana rata-rata dari mereka yang tidak tahu apa sebenarnya rasuah dan politik wang.

Selama ini mereka hidup disulami mimpi indah bermandikan wang ringgit, melakukan sesuatu perkara tanpa mengetahui apa itu yang boleh dianggap rasuah. Malah, mereka menganggap tidak mengapa jika berbillion wang dimasukkan ke dalam akaun peribadi seorang ahli Parlimen. Betullah kata kata Tun Dr. Mahathir bahawa undang undang Malaysia sudah terbalik. Yang haram telah dihalalkan.

Kata kata Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam amat bermakna jika dilihat melalui perspektif ini:

Money politics is the “mother of all corruption”. When practised, money politics leads to vote buying and the abuse of power and the trust of the rakyat as well as supporters of all political parties. In short, money politics brings destruction and decadence to the country’s transparency, accountability, integrity and even democracy itself.

Tidak pernah dalam sejarah dunia, seorang ketua negara itu boleh menjadi ‘billionaire’ dengan sekelip mata hanya kerana telah mendapat ‘hadiah’ atau sumbangan ke dalam akaun peribadi dari orang yang umum tidak mengetahui.

Malah di dalam tahun 2012, Najib Razak telah pun berkata bahawa menerima sumbangan yang tidak dimasukkan ke dalam akaun parti, boleh dianggap rasuah dan penyelewengan.

Adakah ini juga bermakna, di dalam tahun 2013, Perdana Menteri Malaysia telah sepatutnya tersenarai di dalam 20 billionaire terkaya di Malaysia? Hanya kerana beliau seorang Perdana Menteri?

Dan adakah di dalam tahun 2013, Shahrir Samad telah menjadi jutawan segera? Adakah beliau sebagai ahli parlimen yang menerima wang tersebut telah membayar cukai pendapatan? Apakah bukti yang beliau tidak menggunakan wang tersebut untuk tujuan peribadi? Adakah terdapat resit penerimaan dan penyata perbelanjaan yang boleh diaudit oleh pihak ketiga?

Rakyat Malaysia perlu diberitahu perkara yang sebenar. Najib Razak perlu membuktikan bahawa beliau tidak bersalah dan perlu meletakkan jawatan dari menjadi Perdana Menteri sementara siasatan terhadap beliau sedang dilakukan. Ini penting untuk membersihkan nama beliau tanpa ada anggapan beliau mencampuri urusan penyiasatan.

Masyarakat dunia perlu melihat bahawa Malaysia menghormati keluhuran undang undang dan mempunyai integriti yang tinggi dalam menangani gejala rasuah dan salahguna kuasa.

Jika Malaysia mahu berperangai seperti negara yang tidak endah kepada undang-undang dan bermoral rendah, maka mereka akan menganggap bahawa kita dan ekonomi kita patut dikategorikan sama taraf dengan republik pisang atau ‘failed state’.

Cukup-cukuplah berkelakuan seperti orang yang buta hati.

Anda juga pasti ingin membaca:


  2. Memperjuangkan kepentingan rakyat lebih mulia dari memperjuangkan kepentingan Najib.


  4. Menjawab LSS
  6. Harimau depan mata senang dihadapi, yang menghendap itu yang merbahaya

  7. Rafidah: What deal was struck for RM2.6b?
  8. New 1MDB fears whack the ringgit



#malaysian-ge-2013, #public-sector

Isu derma RM2,600 juta makin lama makin merepek

Ya, sememangnya makin lama makin merepek alasan alasan yang diberi oleh mereka yang bertungkus lumus untuk mempertahankan kewajaran Najib Tun Razak menerima RM2,600 juta ke dalam akaun peribadi beliau di dalam tahun 2013.

Ada yang berkata ianya untuk keperluan pilihanraya, ada yang berkata ianya adalah derma dari penyokong Umno, ada yang berkata ianya derma dari negara yang dianggap sebagai abang angkat (brotherly nation), ada yang berkata ianya duit sebagai tanda terima kasih kerana melawan ISIS (pertubuhan pengganas dari Timur Tengah) dan ada yang berkata ianya untuk melawan pengaruh Yahudi dan DAP.

Saksikanlah betapa berubah-ubahnya cerita mereka dari permulaan kisah di mana pada mulanya mereka tidak mengaku ada wang yang dimasukkan ke dalam akaun peribadi perdana menteri! Inilah padah jika bercakap tidak berdasarkan fakta dan kebenaran.

Hanya yang tertelan pil bodoh sahaja yang akan mempercayai alasan alasan tersebut.

Dan yang terkini, ianya adalah kerana rakyat Malaysia mengamalkan mazhab Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah!

Timbalan Perdana Menteri berkata:

“Saya sahkan derma itu dari Asia Barat sebab saya lihat dokumen itu dan berjumpa ketua pegawai pelaburan kepada penderma dan trustee (pemegang amanah) kewangan keluarga penderma itu. Saya tanya kenapa AS$700 juta didermakan kepada Malaysia.

Perlu diingatkan kepada beliau bahawa Malaysia tidak mendapat satu sen pun dari derma tersebut. Najib Tun Razak yang terima di dalam akaun peribadi. Adakah akaun perbendaharaan Malaysia yang mendapat RM2,600 juta tersebut atau pun akaun peribadi perdana menteri?

“Saya tanya kenapa perlu dibantu UMNO dan Barisan Nasional (BN). Dia bagi tiga alasan iaitu pertama, kerana Malaysia cukup komited dalam operasi anti keganasan dan jelas Malaysia ada Undang-undang Pencegahan Keganasan (POTA), Kanun Keseksaan, Akta Kesalahan Keselamatan (Langkah-Langkah Khas) 2012 (SOSMA), kerana kita tidak mahu ada pengganas yang ganggu,” katanya.

Lagi sekali suka diingatkan Umno dan Barisan Nasional tidak mendapat satu sen pun dari derma tersebut. Adakah wang ribuan juta tersebut disalurkan ke dalam akaun parti Umno dan BN atau pun telah disalurkan ke dalam akaun peribadi presiden parti?

POTA, SOSMA dan ancaman pengganas adalah di dalam bidang kuasa polis dan kerajaan. Sememangnya ianya adalah tugas kerajaan dan perdana menteri. Adakah berbillion bajet yang diperuntukkan untuk keselamatan negara setiap tahun tidak mencukupi? Adakah kita perlu menagih dan menerima bantuan dari negara luar untuk tujuan tersebut?

Dan apakah yang diperkatakan oleh undang undang negara apabila seseorang penjawat kerajaan menerima wang dengan banyaknya hanya untuk melaksanakan tugas? Ianya dianggap rasuah.

Definisi rasuah mengikut Suruhanjaya Pencegah Rasuah Malaysia:

Corruption is the act of giving or receiving of any gratification or reward in the form of cash or in-kind of high value for performing a task in relation to his/her job description.

Apakah yang cuba disampaikan oleh Zahid Hamidi sebenarnya? Amat pelik apabila terdapat penjawat kerajaan menerima wang begitu banyak di dalam akaun peribadi, ini dipandang mudah oleh menteri menteri kabinet yang lain.

Ahmad Zahid berkata, perkara kedua menurut penderma berkenaan adalah kerana Malaysia mengamalkan pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah dan penderma berkenaan tidak mahu terdapat mazhab lain yang menyeleweng daripada sunah Rasullullah. Menurut Ahmad Zahid, perkara ketiga adalah kerana komitmen yang jelas iaitu biarpun Malaysia adalah negara majmuk dan sederhana, namun, negara-negara Islam tetap mengiktiraf komitmen Malaysia yang memegang Sunnah Wal Jamaah.

Perkara kedua dan ketiga adalah perihal yang sama iaitu penderma telah menderma ke dalam akaun Najib Tun Razak kerana rakyat Malaysia yang sudah berkurun lama mengamal pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah dan cukup berterima kasih kerana rakyat Malaysia tidak lari dari komitmen untuk terus memegang pegangan tersebut.

Persoalannya, mengapa diberi kepada Najib Tun Razak duit tersebut? Adakah di dalam tahun 2013 setiap rakyat Malaysia yang memegang pegangan tersebut telah mendapat sebahagian dari derma secara langsung dari akaun peribadi perdana menteri? 

Di mana logik bagi seseorang perdana menteri mendapat kredit untuk kepercayaan agama rakyat Malaysia apabila beliau hanya menjawat jawatan tertinggi negara hanya sejak tahun 2009 manakala rakyat Malaysia semua sememangnya sejak dahulu kala lagi telah menganut pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah? Adakah perdana-perdana menteri Malaysia sebelum ini tidak komited untuk mempastikan rakyat Islam Malaysia memegang pegangan tersebut? Mengapa begitu merepek sangat cerita dongeng ini?

“Saya melihat dokumen yang original (asal) bukan fotostat. Saya lihat juga dari segi pemindahan kewangan,” tegas beliau.

Setakat melihat dokumen asal dari segi pemindahan kewangan sememangnya rakyat Malaysia sudahpun melihatnya kerana laporan Wall Street Journal telah pun membuktikan bahawa wang tersebut memang wujud di dalam akaun peribadi Najib Razak.

Walaubagaimanapun, rakyat Malaysia ingin melihat penyata perbelanjaan yang telah dibelanjakan untuk ketiga-tiga tujuan di atas. Di mana buktinya? Bagaimana kami semua ingin mempercayai bahawa setiap sen dari RM2,600 juta tersebut bukan untuk tujuan peribadi jika tidak ada bukti disertakan?

Rakyat Malaysia hanya mahukan kebenaran dan keikhlasan dari pemimpin mereka berdasarkan fakta yang ada.

Terima kasih.

Anda juga pasti ingin membaca:

  2. Terima RM1 Juta Dari Najib Satu Perkara Biasa – Siapa Lagi Yang Pernah Terima Duit Dari Najib Sila Tampil!
  3. The Ringgit’s problem is Najib. Najib’s problem is the ringgit
  4. Frequently Asked Questions on Corruption – MACC

Tun Abdul Razak was a man of integrity, frugal and living a simple lifestyle

It’s Monday. Let’s start the week with something light.

Back in February, New York Times ran an article questioning the incredible wealth of the Malaysian Prime Minister. Among the snippets that can be read:

Much of the concern, even in Mr. Najib’s own long-ruling party, involves questions about the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund. More broadly, though, the prime minister’s trappings of wealth and the widely broadcast tales of his wife’s outsize spending — the diamond jewelry, the collection of extravagantly costly Hermès Birkin bags — have become a focus of Malaysians’ rising unease with their government’s institutionalized culture of patronage and graft.

“We are very concerned,” Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, a member of Malaysian royalty and an independent-minded elder statesman of Mr. Najib’s party, said in an interview in Kuala Lumpur last summer. “We want people of integrity to be up there.”

Mr. Najib, who earns an annual salary of about $100,000 as prime minister, has been battered by news media reports of his wife’s lavish spending. A notable episode involved the Birkin bags: A series of photos that went viral on social media in Malaysia showed Ms. Rosmah holding at least nine of the purses. They typically cost between $9,000 and $150,000 apiece.

Ariff Sabri, an aide to Mr. Najib from 2000 to 2004 who joined the opposition in 2012, said the prime minister kept “piles and piles” of ringgit bills stacked in his safe. And invoices and other documents obtained by The Times show millions of dollars in jewelry ordered for Ms. Rosmah in Hong Kong in 2008 and 2009 — diamond and emerald rings, and diamond, emerald and ruby bracelets.

Contacted by NYT, the Prime Minister’s Office issued an explanation regarding the matter. Basically the PMO said nothing is unusual with all the travel, jewellery purchases or the piles of money in any safes because those came from his position and inheritance money. In their own words:

“..neither any money spent on travel, nor any jewelry purchases, nor the alleged contents of any safes are unusual for a person of the prime minister’s position, responsibilities and legacy family assets.”

Since legacy family assets were mentioned, people were questioning if the late Tun Razak had left tremendous amount of wealth to his sons. That explanation had caused much uneasiness and a few days later, the Prime Minister’s siblings issued a brief declaration to dispute the statement made by the PMO. They are saying:

“We wish to put on record that Tun Abdul Razak was a highly principled man, well-known to all who knew him for his frugality and utmost integrity and any statement or inference to the contrary would be totally false and misleading to his memory and to his service and sacrifices for the nation.  We take issue with anyone who taints his memory, whatever the motive. We would also like to add that our whole family is united on this issue.”

Surprisingly, the Prime Minister himself agreed with his brothers in that Tun Abdul Razak was a frugal man, living a simple lifestyle. The 180 degree turn sounded like this:

“Throughout his career, Tun Abdul Razak was never involved in corruption or wrongdoings. He placed the country’s needs above his own and this can be seen in his engagement with the people and also contribution to the country, which has become his legacy. Since his involvement in politics till his last days in office, Tun Abdul Razak was always known to practise a simple lifestyle and was frugal as well”

This then raised further questions, as to why PMO made that misleading statement, and as asked by the Opposition – what exactly is the source of his ‘outsized’ wealth?

“I am certain that Najib will agree with me that his lack of transparency and the exposé of his family’s hidden and not-so-hidden wealth will only encourage more unhealthy speculations on the origins of his family’s outsized wealth,” said Tony Pua who is also DAP National Publicity Secretary.

“Regardless of the drama behind the relationship between Jho Low, Riza, Najib and his wife Rosmah, which may be worthy of a Hollywood script, the fact of the matter from the various reports is that the Prime Minister’s family has been able to spend and acquire assets globally worth hundreds of millions of ringgit,” said Pua.

Therefore, he added, if Najib believes that his source of unusual wealth and a lifestyle of exuberant luxury is all acquired scrupulously, then he must explain how he obtained them when his only occupation was as the Pahang Menteri Besar (1982-1986), Cabinet Minister (1986-2004), and Deputy Prime Minister (2004-2009) before assuming the Prime Ministership since 2009.

Until today these questions were never answered. Maybe it never will.

You might also want to read:

  1. Isu RM2.6 Billion – Dari Awal Lagi Rakyat Telah DiPerbodohkan

  2. Siapa sebenarnya yang hilang akal?

  3. UMNO Bahagian Langkawi Usul Percepatkan/Batalkan Penundaan Pemilihan Parti

  4. Warkah buat Ahli UMNO: The One Step Guide on How to Remove PahlaWANG BooGees and HUsNit Ulam Jawa

  5. A Dungu Plan
  6. HOT! 1MDB’s debt exceeds RM 50 billion?

RM2,600 juta: Mana bukti perbelanjaan untuk Umno?

Semalam di mesyuarat Umno bahagian Semporna, Tan Sri Muhyiddin telah bersuara mengenai khabar angin di mana ucapan ahli ahli Umno akan dipantau oleh ibu pejabat Umno. Beliau berkata:

“Saya terbaca dalam suratkhabar, saya harap tidak betul dan dinafikan oleh Setiausaha Agung Umno. Bila persidangan perwakilan sedang berjalan sekarang ni, maka akan dipantau nak mengetahui apa cakap apa, siapa cakap apa. Nak tengok apa. Sejak bila kita Umno nak mengawal ahli ahli kita daripada bercakap apa hal yang kita nak cakap? Jangan ugut. Kalau benar berita itu saya fikir luarbiasa. Timbalan Presiden nak cakap tak boleh, naib nak cakap dan perwakilan nak cakap apa, soal dia lah. Nak usul apa, biar dia cakap lah. Ini saja ada platform setahun sekali kenapa nak disekat nak dihalang?”

Sekali lagi persoalan yang ditimbulkan oleh ahli ahli Umno berkenaan 1MDB dan duit berbillion yang diterima oleh Presiden Umno merangkap Perdana Menteri menjadi topik hangat di kalangan orang ramai di mesyuarat tahunan Umno.

Rata-rata ahli Umno merasa gusar dan keliru berkenaan isu isu tersebut kerana permasalahan yang ditimbulkan oleh Presiden parti mereka sendiri ini amat sukar dihadam dan diterima bulat bulat.

Apatah lagi bila Presiden mereka tidak menjawab persoalan dengan cepat, tangkas dan telus. Tidak cepat dan tangkas kerana apabila pada mulanya muncul isu RM2.6 billion di dalam akaun peribadi beliau, jawapan yang diberikan amat kabur. “Tidak menggunakan wang untuk tujuan peribadi” tidak sama sekali menjawab persoalan jika benar wang sejumlah itu telah dimasukkan ke dalam akaunnya.

Tidak telus kerana sesudah sebulan berlalu, barulah pihak lain (SPRM) mengiakan andaian bahawa memang benar duit sebanyak itu berada di dalam akaun beliau. Kenapa tidak ada pengakuan dari Presiden mereka sendiri selama sebulan rakyat Malaysia terkucar kacir diketawakan masyarakat dunia?

Persoalan apakah tujuan wang sebanyak itu dimasukkan ke dalam akaun peribadi pada mulanya dijawab dengan mengatakan ianya adalah untuk tujuan pilihanraya 2013. Bagaimanapun, ianya ditukar menjadi derma kepada Umno sejurus sebelum SPRM mengumumkan kewujudan wang tersebut.

Apabila ahli ahli Umno bertanya ke mana wang itu diagihkan, sekali lagi bukan Presiden yang menjawab, tetapi para jemuan dan tukang kipas yang heboh mengatakan bahawa ianya dibelanjakan untuk tujuan tanggungjawab sosial, untuk membina rumah dan segalanya.

Mereka ini bercakap tanpa fakta dan bukti yang kukuh. Wang RM2.6 billion bukan sedikit nilainya. Apabila mereka cuba menerangkan kepada umum mengenai penggunaan wang tersebut, adakah mereka sudah melihat penyata kira kira atau senarai perbelanjaan yang telah diaudit oleh pihak ketiga?

Bagaimana mereka mengetahui tentang cara dan dimana wang tersebut telah digunakan apabila mereka sendiri tidak tahu menahu mengenainya sebelum berita RM2.6 billion ini muncul?

Sepanjang pengetahuan ahli ahli Umno, wang RM2.6 billion tersebut tidak pula muncul di dalam penyata kira kira parti Umno di dalam mesyuarat agung tahunan 2013. Jika ianya telah terpampang di dalam penyata kira kira pada tahun tersebut, maka tidaklah ianya menjadi satu perkara yang memeranjatkan apabila Wall Street Journal mendedahkan perkara tersebut bulan lepas.

Akan tetapi sememangnya logik wang derma untuk Umno tersebut tidak terpampang di dalam penyata kira kira dan tidak diketahui oleh sesiapa (termasuklah timbalan presiden sendiri) kerana ianya telah dimasukkan ke dalam akaun peribadi tuan Presiden.

Oleh itu, jika wang berbillion tersebut telah diwar-warkan oleh pasukan propaganda Perdana Menteri sebagai wang derma untuk Umno, maka wajarlah para ahli Umno untuk bertanya butiran terperinci dari tuan Presiden mereka sendiri akan penggunaan wang tersebut. Siapa dapat berapa banyak, senarai aktiviti-aktiviti yang mendapat sebanyak mana peruntukkan, Ketua Umno bahagian mana dapat berapa banyak dan lain lain soalan yang berkaitan.

Walaupun Dr. Mashitah Ibrahim berkata Perdana Menteri sekarang ini memimpin mengikut sunnah Nabi, tidak bermakna beliau itu maksum seperti Rasulullah sendiri.

Ahli ahli Umno berhak menanyakan bukti akan penggunaan wang tersebut kerana ianya adalah wang Umno. Bagaimana ahli ahli Umno hendak percaya bahawa wang tersbut “tidak digunakan untuk tujuan peribadi” jika tidak disediakan bukti? Tunjukkanlah resit-resit, invois-invois, baucar-baucar bayaran, buku-buku cek, penyata-penyata bank, senarai penerima; secara telus, ikhlas dan secepat mungkin.

Tidak cukup untuk Presiden sekadar berkata “saya tidak akan khianati amanah rakyat” dan kita rakyat Malaysia harus percaya bulat bulat pada kata-kata tersebut tanpa diberikan bukti yang jelas.

Ini adalah amanah, dan ahli ahli Umno tidak mahu melihat Presiden mereka sendiri pecah amanah sebanyak RM2.6 billion. Sebab itu mereka berhak bertanya dan mendapat bukti.

Tuan Presiden merangkap Perdana Menteri bukannya maksum untuk kita perlu mempercayai seratus peratus.

Akan tetapi apabila pertanyaan dibuat, ungkapan yang diterima adalah – Pertama, “kita sedia bentang akaun Umno jika DAP membentang akaun mereka juga“.

Kedua, ‘Tun Mahathir juga terima dana dari negara-negara Arab untuk membina Universiti Islam Antarabangsa“.

Cubaan untuk mengelak dari memberi jawapan yang ikhlas amat ketara sekali. Ahli-ahli Umno sebenarnya tidak peduli mengenai biji butir  akaun parti DAP. Yang mereka hendak tahu ialah butiran dari akaun peribadi Presiden mereka kerana duit tersebut adalah hak Umno. Bukankah sudah berbuih mulut pasukan propaganda mengatakan bahawa ianya adalah derma dari penderma budiman untuk parti Umno?

Oleh itu, mengapa perlu diseret DAP ke dalam persoalan tersebut?

Keduanya, jika betul lah negara-negara arab telah memberi dana di zaman Tun Mahathir menjadi Perdana Menteri, adakah mereka memasukkan dana tersebut ke dalam akaun peribadi beliau sendiri? Semestinya tidak. Kerana itu adalah prosedur yang salah. Mengapa ada menteri-menteri di dalam kabinet tidak boleh berfikir bahawa prosedur tersebut adalah tidak betul?

Bekas Menteri Besar Terengganu sendiri membidas cara tersebut. Beliau berkata: “tiba-tiba, ada menteri yang kata, derma politik adalah normal. Selepas itu, ada menteri kata, lebih selamat masuk akaun peribadi daripada akaun lain. Lepas ni kaya-raya wakil rakyat apabila derma politik dimasukkan ke dalam akaun sendiri. Selepas SPRM siasat, baru kata wang ini wang parti.”

Nampaknya sesuai dengan hasrat Perdana Menteri yang mementingkan orang yang setia dari yang pandai sebagai pengikutnya, jawapan jawapan yang diberikan oleh pihak beliau amat dangkal dan kurang cerdik.

Seorang ketua bahagian secara yakin mengatakan wang RM2.6 billion telah dibelanjakan sepenuhnya oleh Presiden mereka untuk Umno. Samaada ketua bahagian tersebut telah melihat bukti yang beliau seorang sahaja telah melihatnya, ataupun beliau telah bercakap semberono tanpa mendapat bukti yang sah, kita tidak akan tahu. Kerana seorang yang setia tetapi tidak pandai mungkin akan memberi jawapan diluar tabii jika kita bertanyakan bukti apa yang dipakainya.

Dengan menggunakan ilmu hisab, jika semasa pilihanraya umum tahun 2013 kesemua 13 Ketua Perhubungan mendapat RM50 juta seorang sekalipun, ianya baru berjumlah RM650 juta. Dan jika Umno Pusat mendapat RM500 juta sekalipun jumlah perbelanjaan adalah hanya RM1.15 billion. Di mana baki lebih kurang RM1.5 billion lagi?

Ahli ahli Umno perlu sebulat suara untuk meminta Presiden mereka membentangkan akaun peribadi beliau kerana duit tersebut adalah hak Umno. Adakah wang kepunyaan parti tersebut telah dilaporkan kepada ROS? Apakah peranan Bendahari Umno di dalam penerimaan dan penggunaan wang ‘derma’ ini? Mengapa beliau tidak memberitahu Umno mengenai kewujudan wang tersebut di dalam tahun 2013?

Adakah salah untuk timbalan presiden bertanya ke mana baki wang yang telah dibelanjakan? Nampaknya untuk bertanyakan hal inipun telah diherdik oleh Menteri Komukasi dan Multimedia apabila beliau mempersoalkan motif soalan tersebut. Untuk makluman menteri kabinet setahun jagung tersebut, platform mesyuarat bahagian bukanlah platform umum. Ianya platform parti Umno.

Seperti mana naib presiden Umno sendiri telah bersuara: “Kami bertanya kerana kita ingin tahu. Rakyat yang kita wakili ingin tahu. Kami, sehingga bila-bila adalah wakil kepada rakyat.”

Untuk perhatian menteri kabinet tersebut, apabila beliau dilantik menjadi menteri maka secara otomatik beliau digaji oleh wang cukai rakyat. Oleh itu bekerjalah untuk menjaga rakyat. Bukan bekerja untuk menjaga Presiden parti.

Seperti kata-kata timbalan presiden beliau sendiri di permulaan artikel ini, ahli ahli Umno berhak bercakap apa saja tanpa disekat atau dihalang. Siapakah beliau untuk menghalang seseorang dari berkomunikasi di tempat mereka sendiri? Jika tidak di mesyuarat Umno, di mana lagi?

Terima kasih.

Anda mungkin juga ingin membaca:

  1. 1MDB dan RM2.6 Bil Bukan Soal Politik Tapi Soal Integriti Kepimpinan – TERBAIK Dari MatSaid!
  3. Usul Tidak Percaya Kepada PM…. Adakah SAMA Dengan Usaha Menjatuhkan Kerajaan?
  4. Where is the balance of RM2.6 billion donation, Muhyiddin asks Najib
  5. Kadir: Ku Li could very well be ahead to replace Najib


Fact checking the 1MDB and ‘donation’ debacle


Ever wonder why the exercise to save 1MDB is called a ‘Rationalisation Plan‘?

Because 1MDB had an irrational business model from the beginning..

Step 1: Acquire massive loans

Step 2: Buy assets. Can’t pay loans.

Step 3: Sell assets to pay the loans

But now they are congratulating themselves by saying that 1MDB had made a success in that rationalisation plan.

Not sure which success they are talking about. Is it their success in getting IPIC to help pay the loans they unable pay by themselves?

Is it the staggering loss of RM665 million in their 2014 financial year?

Is it the begging request of loan repayment extensions they made so many times in 2014?

Is it the delays in listing of their power assets due to their own shortcomings? (the government’s propaganda team had the cheek to say this was caused by Tun Mahathir when the fact is, the delays occurred way before Tun’s first article on 1MDB).

Is it the success in getting taxpayers to fork out RM950,000,000 as a standby credit to help 1MDB pay their financial obligation?

Lastly, probably the success is due to the fact that the had needlessly amassed debts to the tune of billions and now need to ‘rationalise’ this by selling off their assets. Some to TNB, some to foreign interests, etc., so that they can pay their debts.

Fun fact – when 1MDB bought the prized land in Sungai Besi and TRX at really low prices, the government and the taxpayers were shortchanged. Some nonsensical people said that that is just left pocket entering the right pocket. This could be true if 1MDB is acting as part of the government. But then again, even the cabinet was not privy to its dealings and operations (at least not until recently).

So when 1MDB could not pay their humongous loan debts and interests, they had to sell these crown jewels of Kuala Lumpur. They are selling them at market price. This would be partially good if all the monies from the sale is returned to the government. It is only partially good because the lands would now be in private hands, not the government (ie., the people).

But the reality is worse. The monies from the sale will almost definitely be used by 1MDB to settle ‘rationalise’ their debts. Which means, the only people who are laughing at the end will be the bankers (for getting their money back), and the new owners of the land once gazetted for bumiputra development.

Double loss for the people and the government. We lose when the land was sold at below market value, and we lose again when the land was sold just to pay off debts.

Now would there be anyone accountable for the irrational behaviour of 1MDB all these while? Shouldn’t there be anyone responsible for this mess? Besides the Deputy Prime Minister, was there anybody in 1MDB that was sacked for this debacle?

It is always funny the way 1MDB responded to questions about their business operations. The usual recycled excuse they give would be – “we have answered the questions”.

But all sundry knows they have not even tried to clear the air over anything.

For instance, when questions were asked as to why they pumped in USD1.83 billion worth of cash into PetroSaudi and yet this obscure middle east company did not pump in a single cent, they went on to give the process on how it happened, instead of why. In the end, it was indeed true that PetroSaudi did not pump in a single cent for the joint venture.

Why did 1MDB terminate the joint venture just after 6 months?

Why did they continue to pump in cash to a JV they had terminated, amounting to USD1.83 billion by 2011?

Why was the joint venture sealed and signed in lightning-quick time? Why was the decision taken in a private meeting in a yacht between the Prime Minister and PetroSaudi without any government officials and 1MDB top management present?

These are just some questions left unanswered by 1MDB. There are a lot more, but we are told not to raise any noise against 1MDB.


“Malaysians are not stupid” – this is what the former Deputy Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had said prior to his sacking two weeks ago.

We had written before that the donation story concocted by the propaganda team was just an afterthought. The reason why this was an afterthought because nobody knew about the money (not even the propaganda team) when the WSJ article appeared.

The Deputy President of Umno did not know about it. The head of Barisan Nasional backbenchers did not know about it. Even the whole Supreme Council did not know about it.

The principle matter is this – why did the money deposited in a personal bank account of a public servant?

That is the main issue. Doesn’t matter if the spin is that the donor wanted it that way, or the money comes from a ‘brotherly nation’, or the money is used for elections, or that RM2.6 billion is used to repair houses and roads in rural areas. Why wasn’t it credited into Umno’s own party accounts? This in turn had raised a lot of questions and dented the credibility of a prime minister.

Some delusional sycophants had the audacity to say it was a trust account when they also do not have the proof it was indeed a trust account. Be it as it may, a trust account would then be transparent and known to all parties in Umno, but it wasn’t transparent therefore it couldn’t be a trust account.

Some even said it is better for the Prime Minister to put that donation money meant for Umno in his personal bank account rather than with proxies. This will surely create a bigger mess if the Prime Minister, god forbid, dies and the billions of money is stuck in that account and legally it will then belonged to his family as inheritance.

Ultimately, if there is an aspiration to say that all the money ‘donated’ have been used for Umno to face the general elections of 2013, then the public, especially Umno members would want to know how the money was spent. Where is the detailed expenditure list for all the RM2.6 billion spent on Umno? How else can the public be assured that the money was not used for personal gain?

But of course, the reply to the public is, we shall do it if the opposition parties show their party accounts too. There is no urgency to show accountability at all.

Firstly, just like Barisan Nasional’s own MCA had said – “party funds never put in private accounts”.

Secondly, if Umno cares about leadership by example and setting the bar high, the people involved in that RM2.6 billion must take the lead in exposing how it was spent, to who and to where and what are they for.

Thirdly, and this is why the afterthought wasn’t thoroughly vetted, a donation is deemed breaking the MACC law if it is deposited in a personal bank account of a public official.

This is succinctly put by a legal practitioner (truncated for clarity):

It doesn’t matter whether the 2.6 billion in the prime minister’s personal bank account was a donation or whether it was held on trust for UMNO. It does not matter, because the law on corruption is very clear.

Let me spell it out for you the provisions of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694) (for brevity, “MACC Act”), despite (the) ignorance and arrogance in insisting that it is okay for Najib to receive funds from ‘donor(s)’.

Section 16 of the MACC Act provides that it is an offence for any person to accept gratification.

Now, what is gratification?

Section 3 of the MACC Act defines gratification as to include “money, DONATION, gift, loan, fee, reward, valuable security, property or interest in property being property of any description whether movable or immovable, financial benefit, or any other similar advantage.”


And then there is section 50 of the MACC Act, which provides for the LEGAL PRESUMPTION that “gratification shall be presumed to have been CORRUPTLY received … unless the contrary is proved.”

What this mean in simple layman term is that the very fact there was an amount donated into the prime minister’s personal bank account (and Najib was aware of it) is more than enough evidence of corruption in the eyes of the law. If the prime minister so insists that he is not corrupt, then it is his duty to adduce cogent evidence to rebut the LEGAL PRESUMPTION that he is guilty (and in so rebutting it is not sufficient to merely provide unsubstantiated denial).

Bear in mind, the MACC Act is an Act of Parliament, which simply means that the provisions of the Act bind the whole nation — i.e. the government as well as all citizens — unlike the UMNO constitution which is not even a law and as such inferior in nature, and applicable only to UMNO members. As such whether or not UMNO Constitution allows its funds to be held on trust by its president, is immaterial and wholly irrelevant, when it comes to the presumption of corruption against Najib.

Be that as it may, if Najib so insists that the alleged donation was received on trust, then the burden lies on him to provide the trust documentations. Even so, it is important to note — in the unlikely scenario that he could adduce such documentations — that does not ipso facto clear him of the offences under the MACC Act. Instead, the very fact that he held the money on trust would actually by extension, make UMNO possibly liable to be charged for corruption as well, because the legal definition of ‘persons’ that could be guilty under the MACC Act, as per spelled out in the Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967 (Act 388) “includes a body of persons, corporate or unincorporate”.

Even the Prime Minister himself had said in 2012 that putting political fund in personal bank account is a form of corruption. Is this a case of not walking the talk?

As the result, today the opposition is suing the Prime Minister for breaking the election law. They may or may not have a case, unless of course the propaganda team creates another new story to defend this ‘donation’ story.

We shall wait for more ‘facts’ to be thrown at us by the minions desperately trying to disseminate their version of the truth.

You might also want to read:

  1. Good governance means walking the talk

  3. Quotable quotes on 1MDB and ‘donations’ to Umno
  4. Malaysia’s Prime Minister: A Dead Man Walking? – Forbes

#1mdb, #malaysian-corporate-matters