Judiciary / Najib Razak / Umno & Barisan Nasional

‘Donation money’ returned in August 2013, yet RM42 million ‘donation’ was still banked in a year later?

Yesterday we wrote a paragraph in the previous article:

The Attorney General chosen specifically by Najib more than 6 months ago has returned the investigation papers to the MACC. Malaysians have long concluded that the anti-corruption laws will be thrown aside and be made inapplicable to this particular public servant who was voted by ordinary Malaysians to be a prime minister.

Given the fact that the AG has done his job as well, and confirmed the suspicions of Malaysians that he will throw away the case by usurping the role of judge and jury, we all can conclude that the conspiracy to white-wash the prime minister under the eyes of the law is nearing its end.

There were so many holes in the AG’s statement this morning that any thinking Malaysians are baffled with its audacity in trying to de-criminalise the prime minister.

For instance, the AG did not say who the ‘donor’ was or why did the AG say Najib Razak only used USD61 million when in the recent Umno General Assembly, he claimed he has used all of USD681 million (RM2.6 billion) for UMNO? It seems Najib returned most of the ‘donation’ in August 2013, a few months after he received it.

“Furthermore, in August 2013, a sum of US$620 million (out of US$681 million) was returned by YAB PM to the Saudi royal family because the sum was not utilised.”

Now who told a lie, Najib or the AG? Can we accept a lying PM and a lying AG?

How was the balance USD61 million utilised? Did he use it for himself or for UMNO? And why did he return a ‘donation’? Nobody we know returned a given donation before. Why didn’t he utilise all of it for the needy in UMNO in a more transparent manner?

And if nothing was wrong, why did the bosses in SRC International run away and became fugitives?

These are just a few questions posed by the people.

But what perplexed us the most is the AG’s final paragraphs on the RM42 million banked into Najib’s personal accounts:

There are no evidence to show that YAB PM had any knowledge and/or was informed that monies had been transferred into his personal accounts from the account of SRC International;

There are no evidence to show that YAB PM had given any approval for the transfer of monies from the account of SRC International into his personal accounts; and

Evidence show that at all material times, YAB PM was of the belief that all payments which were made by him were made from the donation received from the Saudi royal family which was earlier transferred to his personal accounts.

Based on the facts and evidence as a whole, I, as the public prosecutor, am satisfied that no criminal offence has been committed by YAB PM in relation to the three investigation papers. I will return the relevant investigation papers to MACC today with the instruction to close the three investigation papers.

It seems this public officer named Najib Razak does not know/realise/have no knowledge that the money he received was from SRC International, because he never gave any approval for the transfer from SRC International into his personal accounts.

Plus the statement said, Najib Razak thought all money received in his personal bank accounts, including the RM42 million was from ‘donation money’ from the ‘Saudi royal family’. He himself admitted receiving RM42 million in an affidavit.

The question now is, if Najib Razak returned all the donation money in August 2013 how come he was still receiving millions in December 2014 and February 2015?

The transactions authenticated by MACC and sighted by Wall Street Journals are illustrated as below:


In summary, RM42 million was credited in stages:

  1. RM27 million on 26 December 2014
  2. RM5 million on 27 December 2014
  3. RM10 million on 10 February 2015

So what happened to the RM42 million? From where did Najib Razak get that RM42 million? Where did it go? To who and on what was it spent on? The AG’s statement is silent on this one. The figure RM42 million was not even mentioned in the statement. It is almost deliberately left unsaid. Is it because it is the most toxic? In this regard, how could the AG asked the MACC to close the investigation papers?

Najib Razak and his sycophants are the laughing stock of this nation. The cabinet ministers are the laughing stock among the people. Malaysia is the laughing stock of the world. The institutions to safeguard the check and balances are not functioning well; and the sycophants are proud of it. We are deep in uncharted waters.

You might also want to read:

1) DiSebalik TUTUP KES, Isu RM42 Juta Masih Tidak Berjawab

2) A public official named Najib Razak admits receiving RM42 million into his personal account

3) Saudi royals gave $681m in Malaysia PM scandal: attorney general

4) Najib Razak Got $681 Million Personal Donation From Saudi Royals, Malaysia Says

5) Kemaskini – Kes Najib RM2.6 Bil dan RM42 Juta DI TUTUP – UNBELIEVABLE!

6) Bagaimana dengan wang RM42 juta dari SRC? Adakah ianya juga sedekah untuk Najib Razak?

7) Bukan saja bersih umpama bayi baru lahir, rupanya Najib juga suci hatinya


20 thoughts on “‘Donation money’ returned in August 2013, yet RM42 million ‘donation’ was still banked in a year later?

  1. Well … most likely someone else is really holding the purse strings.

    Najib’s role is that of a CLUELESS smiling pseudo newscaster!!

    He only needs to read out loud with a British acccent.


    • Jolly good effort by him in trying to convince us with his British accent but it still don’t change the fact his is a ‘tosser’. And the British accent was the only thing he brought back from UK and nothing else!!!!


  2. So is the war against ISIS/ Islamic militants over since the money has been returned? Malaysia has more than enough money to protect and promote Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah?


  3. Tanggapan semakin berleluasa bahawa UMNO kini terpalit dengan berbagai penipuan hanya untuk menutup kecurian.

    Cuma, jika alat penutup itu nyiru maka bangkai gajah akan terbongkar akhirnya.

    Menteri menteri Najib jelas kurang kebijaksanaan namun dianggap buta tuli dalam membelanya.

    Negara tersayang akan tergadai kelak.


  4. Jmd
    I have not follow the case closely but the are some descrepencies on the fact.

    Can we bank in the money to closed account?

    In summary, RM42 million was credited in stages
    RM27 million on 26 December 2014
    RM5 million on 27 December 2014
    RM10 million on 10 February 2015

    But the account closed in August 2013?


    • He has multiple accounts. The ones that were closed were different from the ones that were frozen. The now defunct Task Force even said that they did not freeze the closed accounts precisely because they were already closed. Thank you.


  5. The situation is quite awkward. To begin with, Apandi said that Najib received USD681m somewhere in March & April 2013 but returned the unspent money of USD620m in Aug 2013.

    Where did the balance of USD61m goes to if Najib didnt spend it????


  6. “He who asks to be appointed as the judge of Muslims, and then he judges justly, he will enter Paradise, but if he judges unjustly he will go to Hell.”
    (Abu Dawud)

    ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amr narrated that The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “Whoever has the following four (characteristics) will be a hypocrite and whoever has one of the following four characteristics will have one characteristic of hypocrisy unless and until he gives it up. 1. Whenever he is entrusted with something, he betrays it. 2. Whenever he speaks, he tells a lie. 3. Whenever he makes a covenant, he will prove treacherous. 4. Whenever he quarrels, he behaves in an imprudent, evil and insulting manner.”
    (Bukhari Book 2)

    Abi Waih narrated from Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman that he said, “The hypocrites of today are worse than those of the lifetime of the Prophet, because in those days they used to do evil deeds secretly but today they do such deeds openly.” (Bukhari Book 88)


  7. Orang-orang yang telah didoakan supaya dilaknat dan celaka oleh Allah, insyallah, mereka akan mati dengan keadaan yang sangat hina lagi terazab. Amin.


  8. The AG and his master should get their lies — sorry, stories — straight. In this latest version the AG says the PM had returned all the balance of the original “donation” in 2013: he got it in March/April 2013, used part of it, and then returned the rest in August 2013.

    And yet.

    In the penultimate version issued by the PM’s lawyer in the case involving Dr Ling Liong Sik, the PM said he doesn’t know where the RM42 million came from nor did he care — he simply assumed it was part of the donation money he had received.

    But that 42 million was banked in 2014. We can infer the cheques he wrote were all issued in 2014. He said he issued these cheques thinking they were drawing from the Arab donation money. How can he make that assumption, when he later said he himself had returned all the money in 2013?


    • Quote: “How can he make that assumption?”

      Simply because he is the most clueless PM who actually leaves decision-making to the numerous committees and the legions of consultants.

      He placed faith in his village of family and cronies as well as the OFFICIAL SECRET ACT to safeguard his interests.

      And yet he holds too many powerful posts.

      “You can’t make anything idiot proof because idiots are so ingenious.”
      ― Ron Burns


  9. Pingback: ‘Donation money’ returned in August 2013, yet RM42 million ‘donation’ was still banked in a year later? | ajai62

  10. Pingback: The Truth of the Matter | 書 政 shuzheng

Astound us with your intelligence!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s