Pak Lah / Socio-economy

News skit on the blocks

With all due respect, I have to disagree with Datuk Rocky.

In his posting entitled Royal Commission to investigate missing Block L and Block M,  he stated that “the Foreign Ministry has admitted, more or less, that the two blocks had been ‘handed over’ to Brunei but only because Brunei has sovereign rights over those oil-rich areas”.

I think it is not true that Brunei, all this while, have the sovereign rights over those oil-rich areas.

To me, I find that the two blocks were indeed handed over to Brunei but only AFTER the Letter of Exchange signed in March 2009 had deemed Brunei as having sovereignty rights over those two blocks.

It still remain to be seen whether Brunei did have those rights before 2009. Or did Malaysia own those two blocks before the Letter of Exchange was signed. Nobody seemed to be asking this.

After reading the press statement from the Foreign Ministry, I find it odd for the Ministry to take pains in telling us Malaysians that the deal secured by the then prime minister, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (“Pak Lah”) would be a win-win situation for both countries.

But in actual truth, Malaysia lost her two territories that have enormous mineral resources which will reap astronomical monetary benefit for the nation.

How is that so?

Through the Ministry’s press statement’s itself.

It is clear from the get go that Brunei never have the total ownership of the two blocks. The Ministry’s feeble attempt to cover the blunder of the previous cabinet was:

With regard to the maritime areas, the Exchange of Letters established the final delimitation of territorial sea, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone of both States.

Malaysia’s oil concession Blocks L and M which coincided with Brunei Darussalam’s Blocks J and K are recognised under the Exchange of Letters as being situated within Brunei Darussalam’s maritime areas, over which Brunei Darussalam is entitled to exercise sovereign rights under the relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982).

The establishment of the CAA incorporating these Blocks provides for a sharing of revenues from the exploitation of oil and gas in the CAA between the two States.

The only mention about Brunei’s rights was the statement regarding UNCLOS 1982.

What is UNCLOS 1982? It is merely a convention that defines the rights and responsibilities of nations in their use of the world’s oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment, and the management of marine natural resources.

It provides a particular country to have a claim on its surrounding waters the rights over its natural resources. In this case, Brunei claims that anything under 200 nautical miles from its coastal lines belong to them. This area is called the Exclusive Economic Zone.

Malaysia too claim this sovereignty rights because those two blocks are situated within 200 nautical miles from its coastline (of Sabah).

Hence, Brunei is only entitled to exercise their sovereign rights. In reality, they do not have the sovereign rights yet.

Therefore, we have a dispute.

Reuters reported in June 2003

KUALA LUMPUR, June 13 (Reuters) – Malaysia and Brunei are in talks to settle a row over the ownership of oil-rich waters that both covet in the South China Sea.

“There is still a question we are sorting out on the offshore dispute,” Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar told Reuters. “We’re working on it.”

Malaysia’s overlapping claim on Brunei’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which stretches 200 km (124 miles) offshore, has sent shudders through the tiny sultanate’s hierarchy.

It was depending on the untapped deep water oil fields to guarantee the next generation’s prosperity, after the Asian financial crisis and bad investments depleted national coffers.

Brunei now produces about 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude and 1.1 billion cubic feet a day of gas — most of it from onshore.

Late in 2000, Brunei said it would offer exploration blocks after declaring an EEZ, giving it rights to fishing grounds and mineral extraction from the sea bed.

But last month, Malaysia forcefully reminded Brunei, wedged between Malaysian territory on Borneo island, of its claim by sending its navy to chase off a drilling team from TotalFinaElf .

The incident, according to sources in Brunei, precipitated an urgent meeting between Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah and Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad last month.

Both governments are keen to keep the dispute under wraps, and Brunei, with 330,000 people and no army, can ill afford to antagonise its neighbour.

There have been suggestions they could come to a sharing agreement, but Syed Hamid was poker-faced.

“We are looking at various mechanisms,” he said, when asked late on Thursday.

Malaysia, which has had territorial disputes with all its neighbours, argues Brunei only has jurisdiction over its continental shelf, in water up to 200 metres deep. About three quarters of the EEZ is in deeper water.

Total, which heads a consortium that won exploration rights from Brunei Petroleum, has been left kicking its heels and the French company has cancelled supply vessel contracts, industry sources said.

But Murphy Oil , which won exploration rights from Malaysia’s state-oil company Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas), carried on drilling.

On Monday, Murphy said it had finished in deepwater Block L, and a rig was being moved to an adjoining block in the Kikeh field, where it announced a substantial find late last year.

Royal Dutch/Shell has been negotiating a production sharing agreement with Brunei Petroleum for a block adjoining Total’s, which closely corresponds to that of another block awarded to Murphy by Malaysia, and will be watching developments carefully.

Another report emerges a month later when the issue finally made some headway:

Straits Times, 3 July 2003

KL plan to end oilfield row with Brunei

The proposal calls for a joint-exploration arrangement for the disputed area about 150km off the coast of Sabah. Malaysia is confident of resolving its territorial dispute with Brunei over the ownership of oil-rich waters in the South China Sea. The regional news magazine, Far Eastern Economic Review, reported in its latest issue that Malaysian officials have proposed a joint-exploration arrangement to Brunei

The arrangement is similar to the one Malaysia already has with Thailand. ‘We have suggested a joint-development-area type solution,’ Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar told the magazine. ‘We have even suggested that after a certain time passes, we will give up more. What we are looking for is a win-win situation,’ he added.

The dispute over the oilfield arose after the discovery of oil in the sea some 150km off the coast of Sabah by Malaysia’s state-owned oil company, Petronas, in July last year. The field – dubbed Kikeh – has an estimated recoverable reserve of up to 700 million barrels, or 21 per cent of Malaysia’s current oil reserves. At current production levels, Malaysia is expected to run out of oil in 15 years’ time.

The Kikeh discovery is large enough to arrest the decline in the country’s oil reserves and provide a helpful cushion for the country’s economy, according to the Review. Soon after, Malaysia and Brunei hired prospectors to explore two nearby blocks. Brunei awarded one block to a consortium led by French company Total this year, and is negotiating with a consortium led by Royal Dutch/Shell for the rights to prospect the second.

Meanwhile, Malaysia’s Petronas has awarded both blocks to a subsidiary and to Murphy Oil. So what are the reasons for the dispute?

In 2000, Brunei claimed sovereignty over the blocks as part of an ‘exclusive economic zone’, or EEZ, which stretches 370km from its coastline. But Malaysia has also long claimed the same area as part of its own EEZ. Analysts say the Kikeh oilfield could extend into the concession that Brunei has awarded to Total.

In March, Brunei sent a gunboat to drive away a Murphy Oil drilling ship from the area. The next month, the Malaysian navy sent several gunboats into the disputed area to block the arrival of a Total ship. After a tense stand-off involving a single Brunei patrol craft, Total backed off. Both sides have since stopped all work in the disputed areas.

Finally, on May 24, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad met Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah on Malaysia’s Penang island to resolve the issue. Malaysia’s proposal of joint exploration is similar to the one it has with Thailand in exploring oil in the Gulf of Thailand under a 50-50 profit-sharing arrangement. According to the Review, Malaysia may use the dispute as leverage to settle other outstanding issues, such as Malaysia’s land border with Brunei near the Limbang River, an issue that has persisted for decades. Dr Mahathir has promised to resolve the matter before he retires in October. Meanwhile, energy officials in Kuala Lumpur say the dispute ‘should be cleared up in two months’.

The above reports are a couple of news that made headlines in 2003.

One thing for sure, the blocks WERE NOT THE UNDISPUTED TERRITORIES of Brunei before the Letter of Exchange was signed by Pak Lah.

An obvious reason to believe this came also from the press statement by the Ministry:

The termination of the Production Sharing Contracts covering Blocks L and M which were awarded by Petronas to Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd and Murphy Oil in 2003 is in accordance with the establishment of the CAA as provided for in the Exchange of Letters.

If Malaysia did not have the claim over the sovereign rights at all, then how could Petronas have awarded the Production Sharing Contracts to its subsidiary and Murphy Oil in the first place?

To me, this matter must be investigated thoroughly.

If Malaysia and Brunei had claimed both blocks as their own, then the matter must be settled through the ICJ (like how we had won Sipadan Island, but lost Pulau Batu Putih).

And to show us he was not sleeping on the job, Pak Lah (two weeks before his forced retirement), triumphantly claimed that Brunei will drop their claim over Limbang. A claim which Brunei dismissed a couple of days after that.

What a farce.

Pak Lah gave away our two oil rich territories too easily, without a fight, and for free.

Pak Lah, his advisers and the cabinet of 2009 must answer for this travesty.

Anyway, territorial disputes is nothing new. Below is the Reuters report from 2004:

SINGAPORE, Dec 8 – High oil prices and dwindling production may help spur Asian governments to resolve decades-old sea border disputes, unlocking billions of barrels of hydrocarbon wealth, analysts and company officials said on Wednesday.

The high-profile East Timor-Australia row over a section of the Timor Sea containing the $5 billion Greater Sunrise gas project is only the most recent among half a dozen maritime boundary wrangles in some of Asia’s most prospective waters.

Tapping into those disputed areas could help slow the import-dependent region’s production decline and the potential departure of oil majors in search of bigger finds.

“These represent latent upstream growth opportunities,” William Lafferrandre, ConocoPhillips’ Business Development Manager for the region, told a conference.

“But as private companies, we can only do so much (to help resolve the disputes).”

An area claimed by both Thailand and Cambodia, for example, may hold an estimated 2-3 billion barrels of oil equivalent, he said.

Asia Pacific claims less than 5 percent of the world’s oil reserves but consumes nearly 30 percent of its production, importing two-thirds of its needs.

With oil prices soaring over $50 this year and nations facing mounting import bills, the impetus is growing to tap domestic waters by solving territorial spats, some of which have been dragging on since the 1970s, the heyday of Asian exploration.

“There’s never been a better time to resolve your boundary disputes than now,” said Noel Tomnay, principal consultant for WoodMackenzie in Asia Pacific.


Getting governments to agree on splitting up hydrocarbon revenues in disputed zones could also spur renewed investment in Southeast Asia, where exploration has been in decline for five years due to a dearth of opportunities.

“The acreage they can’t get their hands on is quite prospective,” Tomnay said.

One particularly enticing area lies in the South China Sea between Asia’s second-biggest producer Malaysia and the oil-rich Sultanate of Brunei, near Murphy Oil’s deepwater Kikeh discovery with an estimated 400-700 million barrels of reserves.

The two governments have been in talks since last year, when the Malaysian navy chased off an exploration team led by Total .

The Spratly Islands in the South China Sea is another hotly contested area between China, Vietnam and Taiwan, but also including Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines.

Last month Vietnam called on China to halt drilling plans in the area, which is highly rated by the industry despite very little seismic study.

“This may be the most difficult to resolve, but it would no doubt lead to new growth opportunities,” Lafferrandre said.

China’s surging oil demand growth, a major factor behind this year’s price rally, has sharpened the issue for the world’s second-biggest energy user.

There have been some success stories in the region, notably newly independent East Timor and Australia’s profit-sharing plan that allowed ConocoPhillips’ Bayu-Undan gas and condensate project in the Timor Sea to start production this summer.

But the two countries are deadlocked over the Greater Sunrise gas development, adjacent to the Joint Petroleum Development Area.

Operator Woodside Petroleum has threatened to pull out its staff from the project if a resolution is not reached by the year-end, which now appears unlikely.

By the way, the title of my article maybe a bit misleading as there is nothing funny about it.

12 thoughts on “News skit on the blocks

  1. still, i wonder, if you can catch the slippage made by the foreign ministry statement, why can’t our PM najib?
    when i first read Tun M statement, i and i think a lot of people out there, already knew that it was given away by Pak Lah for “whatever” reason but definitely not because of the limbang dispute.
    It seems, that a shooting of a 15years old is more important that the sovereignty of Malaysia.
    it seems, that the senators appointment is more important.
    i guess “jebat must die” to create a scenario so that “the dead hang tuah” can be hide and tucked away unti it’s time to bring him back to life again.
    who says history did not repeat ,again, one more time …


  2. Malaysia was managed by morons during the 6YDarkAges.

    The irony is.. the morons thought they were so smart that they proceeded to “correct” all the “mistakes” that the previous “dictator” did. Even until the end of the reign, they still managed to wreck havoc to our beloved country!

    Are we letting them off scot free?


  3. It cannot be true that Brunei has sovereign rights over those oil-rich areas all this while. They have been part of a disputed territory and cannot just be wished away at the stroke of a pen in the normal administrative fashion.

    Where it involves national integrity and sovereignty, it must be referred to Parliament. That’s the only legally constituted authority that can dispose off matters involving sacred national rights that nations go to war for throughout history. Even Tengku A Rahman, having made the decision to so-called “kick Singapore out” in 1965, had “the separation agreement” brought to Parliament for approval. Have we seen anything like this in the offing in respect of those areas?

    This Pak Lah is another example of Melayu bodoh, giving away sovereign rights. The two blocks were handed over to Brunei after the Letter of Exchange signed in March 2009 had deemed Brunei as having sovereignty rights over those two blocks. Who determined that, what was the basis for such a determination, were they discussed in Parliament or at least among the Malaysian public? And indeed, did Malaysia own those two blocks before the Letter of Exchange was signed?

    Now, what, if any, is exactly the link with the long-disputed Limbang? If it means exploration rights exchanged with Limbang, Pak Lah must have gone bonkers.

    There used to be people of high calibre, full of nationalistic spirit at the Foreign Ministry and at the helm of Government. Like during Tun Ghazali Shafie’s and Tun Dr Mahathir’s time. It looks like that breed has died out. In came the likes of a Foreign Minister wanting to help or take back those blokes who tore Malaysian passports, renounced their citizenship, and bad-mouthed the country when refused entry at British airports or not given permanent stay and got stranded in Britain.

    There must be some decent highly skilled diplomatic officers at the Foreign Ministry. Were they posted to God forsaken places or their views simply put aside in the pursuit of some personal agenda. One reads suggestions of 40 years financial benefits accruing to the SIL connected with the deal.

    Now DS Najib speaks about negotiating a “win-win” deal with Brunei. He must make sure that the win is the Government and the country, not individuals. Whatever that involves national integrity and sovereign rights must be referred to Parliament before finalising. We must not have a Banana Republic kind of mentality in running the affairs of the country.


  4. Now. If you are the PM what would you do? Tell the other party we are now treating the letters as invalid, and create an international accident?
    Todate I have yet to see a good suggestion.
    If our navy is surrounding the foreign land, what good it do for them to have sovereignity? If the big brother come into the picture, with big guns blazing, then there will definately be problem.
    As long as Petronas is `the’ partner in this venture, we may have stable situation and gain something good from bad situation, and without no big brother interfearing.
    If it is Singapore things could be worse.
    As for the perprators, something has to be done, not by PM but by rakyat. We must push the authorities for action, lest this things will happen again. Writing opinion is easy, but to deliver ones feeling through action is something else.


  5. Pingback: KTM land issue vs Singapore «

  6. I think you guys should read this
    I think Lawas and Limbang should start thinking about rejoining Brunei, because they were taken by force by Raja Brooke.
    After 47 years in Malaysia where is the promised development? if you look just across the Limbang Bay Brunei is progressing much further.
    You orang Malaya is just talk
    Sabah Sifu

    JMD : I think it is about time people in Sabah and Sarawak take ownership of their own progress for the last 5 decades.

    All this grumbling and tantrums about ‘oh how we are lagging in development and it is all Semananjung’s people’s fault’ must end.

    Sabah and Sarawak were allocated one of the biggest funds every year amounting to billions of ringgit and it is up to your local leaders ever since 5 decades ago to be responsible for this fund. Other states in Semenanjung had lesser allocation and no one is complaining. They take the blow at the chin and held their head up high.

    You people over there have so much resources such as timber and huge revenue earning potential from tourism and yet you guys are still complaining that it is the people in Semenanjung’s fault when things did not go your way?

    Get a grip of yourself and wake up.

    Your argument is really ridiculous. If you have something to complain about, then blame it on your local leaders!

    It is absurd to dump the mess you are facing on us here. Even the rape of Penan girls in Sarawak was blamed on the people in Semenanjung by saying we in Semenanjung are not helping these helpless Penan girls.

    Hello! It is the Sarawakian people who are raping these Penan girls and yet it is the people in Semenanjung gets the blame?

    Grow up mate. You can’t call yourself a sifu if you keep on throwing tantrums. Thank you.


    • Why is the price of goods in Sabah 100% more than KL? Its because UMNO conspire with MCA which is supported by the shipping cartels. Why the PKNZ will cost the government RM12billion? Its because these shipping cartel have all the Malaya politicians in their pocket. How do they get all the money to buy these Malaya politicians because of the Cabotage policy and you call yourself Malaysian.
      The politically correct word is Malaya not Semenanjung.

      JMD : Price of goods in Sabah is more expensive than KL because of BN’s fault? Maybe you should take this up to Pairin Kitingan then and he will speak on your behalf in the weekly Sabah BN meeting over there.

      Politically correct word is Malaysia my friend. Malaya as a country has changed its name to Malaysia. People in other countries will call this country as Malaysia. We all live in Malaysia. I can be more precise when I say I live in Semenanjung Malaysia. Nothing wrong with that. Why would this make you throw a tantrum?


      • Wake up man, what do you think BN is all about? perhaps you are so far away that you never feel the undercurrents. BN may lose Sarawak this coming election because people like you will never change. Pairin have sold off his soul to BN, he will lick his own spit to be a Minister. BN made another mistake appointing him thinking he can manage the Dusuns. Far from it in Sabah he is a nobody.
        Well we shall see the outcome in Sarawak, then you will sing a different tune.
        The politically correct term is Malaya, Semenenjung is not in the Agreement and I am not throwing a tantrum. Its just that people like you are not interested to build a nation, you are actually destroying it by taking things too lightly.

        JMD : Such pompous attitude from yourself may not borne well for the people in Sabah and Sarawak. What is it about me that you want to change? That I believe in BN’s ideology? True, they have many weaknesses and had done a number of mistakes. I have no qualms in criticising them and I do not mince my words when I write about anything that I do not agree with.

        My point from the previous replies to you really resurface here when you lambasted Pairin as shown above. It is your responsibility together with the Sabahans to pick the leaders you want to manage your state. Why blame it on us here in Semenanjung? If they can’t fight for your rights, then is it entirely our fault here?

        So okay, you said Tan Sri Pairin is a nobody in Sabah. You are entitled to your opinion. Who am I here to say that your ex chief minister of Sabah has no clout whatsoever?

        But as a person living here in Malaysia, I would like to correct one of your opinion – about your stubborness in calling this part of land as Malaya. That name for a country no longer exist my friend. Why are you so dense? Semenanjung here does not mean a name of a country. Semenanjung is a geographical reference to this part of Malaysia, hence, Semenanjung Malaysia. A direct translation of Peninsular Malaysia lah. All these tantrums about.. “hey! it’s Malaya, it’s Malaya, not Semenanjung!” is getting tiring to watch, really. Getting a bit silly in fact.

        Anyway, why are you so bent in ridiculing the people here in Semenanjung? Is this how you try to ‘build a nation’? By creating hatred amongst the people in Malaysia?


Astound us with your intelligence!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s