Tun Dr Mahathir and his book

28 05 2008

YABhg Tun Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad will hold an autograph signing session for the book “Dr Mahathir’s Selected Letters to World Leaders”

Date    -  Thursday, May 29, 2008

Venue  -  Bookfest Malaysia 2008, KL Convention Centre, Hall 1, Ground Floor.

Time    -  11.30am - 12.30pm

“Image of book cover are the copyright property of Marshall Cavendish (M) Sdn Bhd and is being used with permission under license. This image may not be copied or downloaded without permission from Marshall Cavendish (M) Sdn Bhd. Online bookstore : www.marshallcavendish.com”

Trust me, this book is an excellent reading material. I fully recommend it to all.   





Tun Salleh Abas should challenge Sultan Johor too!

26 05 2008

I read with mild amusement on Tun Salleh Abas’ statement over Matthias Chang article in Big Dog’s blog. His opening statement reads somewhat like this;

“Since (Matthias Chang) doubts my innocence, (he) should devote his activities towards getting a government agreement to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate into the circumstances of my dismissal and the suspension of 5 other Judges that led to the eventual sacking of 2 of these Judges.”

Firstly my dear Tun, you are not innocent as deemed by the law. Please do not tell lies and misinform the public. He later suggested;

“The Royal Commission of Inquiry should call as witnesses, among others, the following main players in the 1988 event:

1. Dr Mahathir Mohamad
2. The former Chief Secretary to the Government
3. The former Attorney-General Abu Talib Othman
4. Hamid Omar, who chaired the Tribunal and who succeed Salleh after his sacking
5. Other members of the two Tribunals
6. Tan Sri Haidar (chairman of the 2007 RCI into VK Lingam’s tape, who testified at the 1988 Tribunal)
7. The surviving Judges who were suspended/sacked by the Tribunals.”

Tun Salleh had conveniently excluded the most important figure of all. The one who started all that. The Sultan of Johor, Al-Mutawakkil Alallah Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj ibni Almarhum Sultan Sir Ismail Al-Khalidi. I would want to see how Tun Salleh Abas deal with the Sultan in the proposed Royal Commission Inquiry set up under the order of the present Agong. I doubt he would even dare to do it. After all, he chicken out (pardon my presumption) when the original Tribunal ordered him to defend himself in 1988. You know what’s worse than a politician? A judge who became a politician.

Maybe the government should also set up a commission on why a junior judge like Tun Salleh Abas, was appointed as the Chief Justice in 1984? Were there some elements of lobbying? Why was several senior judges like Tun Hamid Omar were overlooked at that time?   

By the way, Matthias Chang answered Tun Salleh’s call in Rockybru’s blog;

[Rocky Bru's note: This response to a response was sent by Matthias through E-mail about 7.30pm].

MATTHIAS CHANG’S RESPONSE
TO TUN SALLEH’S CHALLENGE

I was just informed by Rocky that Tun Salleh has issued a challenge to me in response to my article which was published in MALAYSIA TODAY and Bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com

I immediately visited Rocky’s blog to read the challenge and to say that I was most disappointed in Tun Salleh’s challenge, is an understatement.

Why?

He asked me to demand from the government to establish a Royal Commission to investigate into his dismissal. Why should I? I hold the view that the Tribunal had every reason to hold that Tun Salleh had misconducted himself as per the charges.

Is it my responsibility to call for a Royal Commission when a Tribunal convened by King himself found him guilty of all the charges that was proffered against him? He should be the one who should “lobby” the government if he feels strongly that he has been unjustly victimised!

In anticipation of Tun Salleh’s reply that he did not demand a Royal Commission during Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s tenure as Prime Minister because it would not receive a favourable response, my query to Tun Salleh is:

Why have you not demanded a Royal Commission after Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad retired in October 2003, and thereafter in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and only now in 2008?

You are legally trained and held the highest judicial office. So, if anyone knows about rights and legal remedies, it must be you. All these years why have you not commenced any legal proceedings to establish, as you have alleged, that you have been wrongfully dismissed? You had a team of senior lawyers advising you. What was their legal advice?

It is a pity that Tun Salleh does not realize that the powers that be have used his dismissal to prop-up the Badawi regime after the 12th General Elections fiasco. Tun Salleh is a mere pawn in this political wayang kulit orchestrated by the spin doctors of the Badawi regime.

In my article, I posed certain questions to Tun Salleh and demanded to know his answers.

Why is Tun Salleh avoiding the issues posed by my questions and diverting the issues by asking me to “lobby” for a Royal Commission?

Tun Salleh should be transparent first and answer my questions.

1) Did Tun write two letters to the Agong? What was the content of the first letter?

2) Did Tun advise his fellow judges, especially the five judges who supported him, the contents of the first letter?

3) If Tun did, what was their response?

4) If Tun did not advise the judges, what were Tun’s reasons for the cover-up?

ROCKY, I am truly disappointed in you. You have read my article and having done so, have you posed the questions to Tun Salleh?

After all, you are assisting in Tun Salleh’s memoirs. Surely, you should be equally interested in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Please pose this response in your Blog.

Thank you.

Matthias Chang
25th May 2008 7.25pm
Kuala Lumpur

      





Umno should not kill the messengers!

26 05 2008

Long time ago, in times of war, being a messenger was surely the most unenviable job in the whole world. Messengers or emissaries were often killed if the messages were not to the receivers’ liking. Augustus Caesar used to chop the heads of his enemies’ messengers arriving at his court. Vlad the Impaler was more horrific. He impaled all the Ottoman messengers coming to his Romanian palace. Messengers were innocent mostly. After all, they were only conveying the message of their liege lords.

Is there a point to all this? Yes.

Mukhriz Mahathir, Tun Dr Mahathir, Syed Ali Al-Habshee and to some extent, Shahidan Kassim and Muhyiddin Yassin are merely messengers. Whose message are they carrying? The ordinary (and scared) Umno members. What is the message? Pak Lah needs to step down in order to revitalise and strengthen the weakened Umno.

Up till now, nearly 3 months after the great loss in the general election, Umno has not made any serious effort in charting a clear, reliable and viable action plans to strengthen the party. With Gerakan rebranding their image yesterday, and MCA held their EGM only days after the election, Umno is still running around like a headless chicken.

This party is running around like a headless chicken simply because its President is so afraid to confront his own party members! He would rather send his Deputy, the Vice Presidents or the Information Chief to face the grassroot members. Any direct face-off was quickly killed off with the absence of any Q & A session or very limited time to air grievances.

Isn’t it obvious there won’t be any action taken to rebrand the party because the infamous President is famous for his inability to listen to the grouses and his supreme sense of denial. Does he believe that only by getting some (forced) support of the Branch leaders and Division Heads and the MPs is enough to continue leading the nation without any form of self assessment? I wonder when was the last time he took stock of his popularity and performance?

The level of criticisms and hurled abuses those people received for conveying the message to Pak Lah are very unfortunate indeed. The staunch defenders of that weakling such as Zaid Ibrahim, Annuar Musa and Hishamuddin Hussein are fighting a lost cause to begin with. Firstly, they need to understand that those people who demanded Pak Lah’s resignation are only conveying an important message by the ordinary members. By getting themselves entangled with the momentum gained by the grassroots will only make them imbeded as part of the problems within Umno (if they are not part of it already). The grassroots will surely would not want people who are intolerant to criticisms be their leaders.

Secondly, they need to remember that the Umno grassroots of today are different from the grassroots of yesteryears. If they see a weak President at the top as compared to the predecessor they used to respect, then, any attempt to defend the weakling will be construed as the denial of freedom of speech. Simply reading from www.mykmu.net we can gauge the true sentiment of most Umno members.

Before Umno loses all respect from every quarter, they need to quicken the pace in rehabilitating it. Now, even the Mufti of Perlis had directly criticised Hishamuddin Hussein for his lack of principles and good sense. It should serve him right. A weak leader defending his equally weak boss. How appropriate!

In the end, if Umno want to stay relevant, they should not kill the messengers. Instead they it should heed their calls!                         





The week in review

22 05 2008

I’m sorry for not being able to update my blog for almost a week now. Have been terribly busy with work and some voluntary jobs over the weekends. But aren’t we glad to be living in these exciting times? There has never been this much interesting news to chew upon since the day after the general election. I am overwhelmed with the amount of things that had happened for the past 1 week that had made it impossible to complete dissecting any news before another story crops up and stole the previous news’ limelight.

Therefore, in the effort to gain a little bit of sleeping time, here is the round up of the past week (please click on the link to read the full story);

FRIDAY 16th May 2008

  • Royal Commission of Inquiry submits its report to the Cabinet and later on, the AG ordered the people connected to the VK Lingam inquiry to be investigated. One point that needed to be raised here is how can Tun Dr Mahathir be made guilty when what he did was following the provisions provided in the Constitution?

    Under Article 122B of the Malaysian Constitution, the appointment of the Chief Justice, like those of the President of Court of Appeal, the two Chief Judges, judges of the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal and the High Court, are made by His Majesty The Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers.

    However, before tendering his advice as to the appointment of a judge other than the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, the Prime Minister shall consult the Chief Justice. A tough act by any prosecution I guess. To a large extent, any critics need detail out what are the parameters on the relevant words such a ‘advice’ and ‘consult’. And what kind of evidence needed to even suggest that Dr Mahathir had done wrong there? 

  • The Prime Minister’s Department lodges a police report against several mainstream newspapers including The Star, Utusan and NST. A bit peculiar here since the 4th floor boys are acting against a newspaper headed by one of them (Kalimullah Hassan). It is obvious that the ‘leaks’ came from one of them initially.

  • An odd job worker got the green light by all three of his current wives to marry another younger woman (reading this piece of news gave me hope as I know there are some single women out there who do not care about looks, status, wealth or the wrath of the first wives club).

  • A man was jailed for sending lewd photo to a female friend through his mobile phone. Why would he want to send his wife the photo of his private parts anyway? Thinking his wife may have forgotten how it looks like maybe? That was just an excuse. To me, he is unmistakenly a pervert.

SATURDAY 17th May 2008

  • It seems that Tony Fernandes had been barking up the wrong tree with the revelation by the Transport Minister, Ong Tee Kiat. Poor Tony. Greedy boys won’t win anything Tony. Even the deputy CEO seems to be equally dense by saying - “We have many restraints. Why is MAS focusing on AirAsia routes? Why are they targeting our model?” . Err.. aren’t those AirAisa routes originally being serviced by MAS before AirAsia took over? And now,  those routes were given back to MAS after AirAsia had finished sucking out money from it.
  • In the mean time, Datin Seri Wan Azizah’s effort to highlight corruption in the Ministry of Defense (definitely taking orders from her husband) had greatly backfired and left her face red in embarassment. In the end, it was made known that it was her husband who had approved the project.
  • Malaysia lost in the semi finals of the Thomas Cup in Jakarta. The lost of 2 - 3 to China was not unexpected. But Malaysia fought hard and should not feel ashamed by the defeat. The surprise finalist, South Korea beat the Indonesians to reach the finals against China.
  • Nik Aziz proclaimed that Pak Lah should not take all the blame for the political situation in Umno and Malaysia generally. Nik Aziz forgot that he is also a politician in a political party. Maybe he should take the blame for politicising religion for the sake of having power. Trumpeting that Islamic country is the aim of PAS ad nauseam can be quite nauseating since that aim is strongly opposed by PAS’ partners in the Pakatan Rakyat.       

SUNDAY 18th May 2008

  • If you are looking at a sample on how stupid the Malaysian government is, look no further than the indelible ink fiasco. The indelible ink fiasco continued to haunt the SPR and the government with a statement by the SPR Chairman days earlier regarding the directive from the Cabinet to cancel the use of the ink. In return, the government denied it was a directive and instead, deemed it as only a ’suggestion’. I assume, unlike all the road signs in Malaysia (which nobody cares), the Cabinet suggestion could easily be regarded as a directive. Read it here and here.
  • Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin announced that he is not an ambitious politician. Logically, a non-ambitious person would have never rise as high as him in the first place. He was the Menteri Besar of Johor from 1982 to 1995 and now a Vice President of Umno. I’m betting that he will challenge the top two post and will announce his intention by June 2008. Humility is good. But ambition will make you go further. 
  • MIC is asking a yearly fund of RM300 millions from the government to help the Indian community. I do not understand the request of this fund as the people already have the proper channels to ask for government’s assistance. For instance, the MIC President said that the fund will be spent on agro-based business development and school affairs. I think that is the reason why we have Agricuture Ministry and the Education Ministry not to mention the Rural Development Industry in the first place. In my opinion, this is just a ploy to increase his war chest in the face of party elections coming up soon. Being unemployed sucks with no source of income to appease his supporters’ appetites.
  • The civil servants need not to be selfish in serving their role, so says the Raja of Perlis. It is sad for the civil servants to be reminded about this issue time and time again unless they actually are known to be selfish and corrupt. Are they?      

MONDAY 19th May 2008 

  • Tun Dr Mahathir and Tan Sri Sanusi Junid quit from Umno. Too many analysis and opinions came forth from this issue. From my observations, people tend to see all the good and bad things brought forward by Dr Mahathir during his 22 year tenureship as the Prime Minister. However, people often forget that he is the last surviving Prime Minister who had directly involve in the fight for the Independence. He was one of the first, original Umno members and he was among the people who had decided to defend the sovereignity of the Malay rulers against the creation of Malayan Union. Thus we must not see him as only a former Prime Minister but also as one of the founding fathers of Independence. In 1957, Tun Abdul Razak (then Datuk) became the Deputy Prime Minister at the age of 34. Tun Dr Mahathir, was 32 at the time and was actively involved in the nation building process eventhough he wasn’t politically active at that time. To confine his good deeds just within his 22 year rule is seemed unfair. At least he should be applauded for his efforts and sacrifices made during the fight for Independence. Without Tunku Abdul Rahman and his Umno members (including Dr Mahathir) in that era, we can never be as prosperous as we are today.   
  • Happy Wesak Day!
  • Tun Musa Hitam equates Tun Dr Mahathir as a ‘thorn in the flesh’ when giving his comments about the former Prime Minister quitting Umno.
  • Melaka opened a new landmark called ‘Menara Taming Sari’. A gyro-viewing tower which can accomodate up 3,500 people during the weekends. Also billed as the highest viewing tower in the world.

TUESDAY 20th May 2008

  • AirAsia Bhd owes MAHB RM110 millions since 2002. And the amount owed did not show in AirAsia’s financial statements! Tony Fernandes sounded more and more like a petulant child complaining and throwing tantrums needlessly.
  • Efficient robbers came in wearing only their underwear and facemasks and robbed a house in Miri. I think their leader went to time management course some time ago and practiced this time saving method in order to save time (robbing and raping).
  • Illegal parking operators are a menace to the public and thank god DBKL is catching these unscrupulous people under their ‘Operasi Jaga’.
  • Predictably, all the Umno MPs pledged their support to Pak Lah. Datuk Mukhriz however, was missing during the meeting.

WEDNESDAY 21st May 2008

  • Malaysian bloggers ought to be happy they are living in a country where the media freedom is very much lax as compared to their neighbour down south. And to think most of the Malaysian bloggers like to migrate there! If we use the yardstick used by the Singaporean government, most of the bloggers and their commenters in Malaysia would be hauled up in jail (judging from the awful comments in most of Malaysia Today’s articles).
  • Datuk Nallakarupan, now the President of a new found party - Malaysian Indian United Party, met Pak Lah for about 5 minutes and declared his undying loyalty and love towards the Prime Minister. Nallakarupan was infamous for his friendship with Datuk Anwar Ibrahim but suffered a fall out after the latter did not select the former to stand in the Ijok by election a couple of years ago. Anyway, all this brown nosing made me sick.
  • Who the hell is Beego and why would we care about his divorce?
  • Where are you? 1,649 children have been missing since 2002 and not much has been done to deter the rising crime index. Somebody must be sleeping somewhere.   

THURSDAY 22nd May 2008

  • Tun Dr Mahathir gave a stinging reply towards Tun Musa Hitam’s assertions that the former is a ‘thorn in the flesh’. It is true with what some people are thinking. Dr Mahathir outside Umno is more dangerous to Pak Lah’s government than when he was inside it. I bet some people would be more cautious before they launch any attack towards him. Tasting one’s own medicine can be very bitter indeed.
  • Matthias Chang, a lawyer and former political secretary to Tun Dr Mahathir, continued his lucid attacks towards Tun Salleh Abas. He may have a case there. The judiciary crisis of 1988 story may be far from over. 
  • Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Aziz arrogantly declared that Umno will do better without Dr Mahathir in it. Two questions came to my mind the moment I saw his interview here. One, is Umno can be better with him (Nazri) in it and two, will Umno going to be stronger in the coming months when it is being led by someone like Pak Lah? 
  • And the picture of the week;    

Pak Lah fell asleep during a press conference while his deputy spoke on during an Umno Supreme Council Meeting last Wednesday night. Sheesh..!

 





No action against food shortage actually

15 05 2008

Several years ago, I was working for about 2 years in the food industry. I had come to realize back then that the increase in price of rice is quite inevitable. Luckily, the government made 5 initiatives in order to curb the rising prices of rice. These initiatives are;

  • Maintaining the controlled price of between RM1.65 and RM1.80 per kilo for the Super Tempatan 15% rice.
  • Ceiling price for Super Special Tempatan 5% at RM2.80 per kilo and Super Special Tempat 10% at RM2.70 per kilo effective 1 June 2008. Note that the 5%, 10% and 15% percentile means how much percentage the quantity of broken rice in a kilo. That is why 5% rice is slightly more expensive than the rest as it has less broken rice in the mix.
  • Price of imported rice are floated.
  • Movement of rice across state borders is to be freed in stages.
  • Raising the Guaranteed Minimum Price (GMP) for farmers from RM650 to RM750 per tonne.     
     

Apart from that, the national stock buffer will be increased from 92,000 tonne to 292,000 tonne. Will this solve the looming crisis of price increase? Probably yes. Will this solve the actual root cause of the problem? Sadly no. The root cause of the price increase is the shortage of food worldwide. But the government seemed to tackle different issue altogether.

I can see that the government had approached the problem from the consequential evidence, which is - people can’t afford to pay the expensive food.  What they should have done is to approach the cause of the problem - output of food supply is dwindling under the impact of increased demand (increased population + food consumption). So what did they do? By focussing on the consequence, they worked on the above initiatives which predominantly only tackling the pricing issue.

To me, one of the things that they should have done as in the case of this rice issue is to urge the local farmers to increase output of rice. From two seasons a year to 5 seasons in two years at least. Officially the farmers are currently producing paddy crops twice a year but I do know that most of them are only producing it once a year. The remaining idle months they spent doing something else. Let me tell you a secret; the farmers are a lazy lot. They scream and rant that BERNAS are squeezing them by only buying their paddy crops at RM650 per tonne. But at the same time, they actually are selling bad quality crops to BERNAS while their good quality crops are sold to the highest bidder in other private paddy mills not belonging to BERNAS. There were cases where BERNAS officials found debris, rocks and tree branches in a pile of paddy crops after it had been unloaded from the lorry right after disembarking from the weighing bridge. To accuse them of cheating will make the farmers run straight to the nearest ‘wakil rakyat’ and soon, BERNAS will be called all sorts of names in the Parliament for not thinking about the ‘welfare’ of the farmers.

BERNAS can’t afford to pay more than RM650 because to increase it, will make the price of rice too expensive for the end customers. Remember, a tonne of paddy crops will not necessarily be transformed into 100% of rice at the end of production. In a good batch of crop, only about 60% (this is called the ‘rice recovery rate’) of the whole tonne can be turned into pure rice. The balance 40% are actually the paddy’s inedible parts, its husk and other impurities. In a bad quality crop, BERNAS would be lucky even to reach 40% rice recovery rate.

Furthermore, the process of separating the paddy from its husk, cleaning, polishing the rice, sorting and packaging them costs another RM700 to RM800. Eventually, the total cost of producing local rice is between RM1,400 to RM1,450 per tonne. And what’s the price ceiling for the controlled local rice? Around RM1,300 per tonne. For every tonne of rice that BERNAS produces, they lose about RM100 to RM150. All in the name of social obligation. And how much does BERNAS produce rice locally? Around 1.3 million tonnes per year. That is why BERNAS who has an average sales of RM1 billion per year can only manage to gain profit before tax of about RM100 million per year or less.

Their production costs are eating 90% of their sales figure! And what saved BERNAS from being in the red? The imported rice. Inported rice from Thailand and other parts of the world is bought cheaply by BERNAS and sold at a higher price to the end users. But the import of rice is regulated by the government in order to protect the local farmers. Everytime BERNAS has to place and import purchase, they have to seek approval from the Ministry of Agriculture. That is why, import rice are limited to about 700,000 tonnes per year. If only BERNAS could at least break even on their local rice production, they can gain at least 30% more of their profit before tax.

The average annual demand for rice in Malaysia is about 2 million tonnes of rice. How do they arrive at this figure? Okay the average eating consumption of a Malaysian is about 80kg of rice per year. This is an average figure. It could be more or it could be less. Depends on whether a person likes pizza more or their ‘nasi campur’ more. But the difference won’t be that much. 80kg times the population of Malaysia at 27 million people gives you 2.16 billion kg or 2.16 million tonnes per year.

Approximately 2 million tonnes of rice per year will satisfy the demand of the Malaysian public. But why is there shortage? Easy. The foreign workers.

The accounted and the unaccounted (illegal) foreign workers. To date, the official count of foreign workers is slightly less than 3 million people including the illegal ones estimated around half a million.

Let me digress a bit by telling you a story of a friend of mine who went to China recently to visit some coal mines there. He visited a small village deep in the heartland of China. It was a small village by the Chinese’ standards because it only has a population of 12 million people in it! That wasn’t a typo. I kid you not. Now China has a ‘one child policy’ in placed since 1979. If a couple gave birth to a second child, they will be imposed huge fines upon the moment they wanted to register the newborn child. The fines were normally so heavy they had no choice but to leave the child unregistered all their lives. In rural areas, most families have children as many as they liked since they couldn’t afford to pay the fines for the second child anyway. The unregistered children may face problems in the future but they can still have adequate resources to live as they are geographically isolated and can afford to self sustain with the use of their own farmlands and making their own supplies etc.

Recently, they have millions and millions cases of young adults wanting to register themselves and had collected enough money to finally pay the fine and get themselves registered. For all we know, China, with the official population rate of 1.1 billion people could actually have 2 billion people instead!

Coming back to the topic at hand, foreign workers especially the Indonesians and Myanmars eat a lot of rice. The average eating consumption of Indonesians and Myanmars is 125kg of rice per year. With the huge surge of foreign workers in the country and the inability of the authorities to curb the rising number of illegal immigrants into this country, no wonder our food source is drying up as soon as it went into the shelves of hypermarts and sundry shops. This is a grave situation that the government had failed to see its many impact. Not just on the crime rate, but on our food supply as well.

Another matter which is the factor is the dwindling of cultivated lands. In Malaysia, each paddy fields are lined with dividers known as ‘batas’. This is purely territorial in nature. Historically, one paddy field owned by a farmer long ago could have reached the size of 10 acres each. But due to passing down inheritance to their descendants, the once huge paddy field is divided to give away to his many sons and subsequently divided further to his grandsons by the use of these ‘batas’. These dividers are eating up precious land area if you total them up together. An acre of paddy field can produce up to 5 tonnes of paddy crops in a season. But if an acre is strewned with so many dividers then the amount produced would be much smaller than 5 tonnes per season.

In Thailand (one of the biggest rice exporter in the world), there is no such thing as these ‘batas’. Each paddy field is so huge you can’t even see the edge of it if you’re standing at one side of the field. No dividers lining their fields in sight. Thus, the Thais can maximise their output. This was what BERNAS was trying to achieve some time ago but as usual, our territorial local farmers were so paranoid that they might confuse their own paddy fields to another if the dividers were to be disintegrated. Thus, they would rather keep their underutilised paddy fields rather than helping BERNAS to achieve greater output. They were too deaf to hear that an increase of output will eventually increase their income.      

I believe, taking everything into account from the above, those are the root causes of food shortage. Lack of reliable data to correctly calculate the demands of food supplies in the country vis a vis the rate of food production/output. The government should solve these illegal workforce problems, increase the output of farmers, motivate them to produce more before finally moving on to tackle the pricing issue. The food shortage will always be there regardless of the inititatives done to tweak the prices. In this, the government should be more focussed and should obtain more intelligent advice from the experts. Relying on just the Ministry of Agriculture to tackle this problem is not universally adequate. All areas should be covered and all ministries should chipped in ideas to solve the root of this problem.

Just my 2 cents…

 





Now you can blackmail your way to Parliament (Updated)

14 05 2008

12 May 2008:

I have always stated that people need to judge the leaders very carefully before pledging their support and loyalty towards them. This support and loyalty could be an act of misplaced blind faith towards the wrong kind of leader.

In my previous post, I touched upon the issue of an apparent blackmailing activity by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with regards to a certain defence lawyer - VK Lingam. One of the accomplice is Loh Gwo Burne. In that post, I had mentioned about this incident in the paragraphs below;

“In the recent interview with BBC HardTalk, Dr Mahathir mentioned that Anwar was blackmailing VK Lingam via the secret recordings made in 2001. At this point, the allegations of fixing the appointment of top judges in the country is not relevant to me. What is more telling was the act of blackmailing VK Lingam itself. The one that was taking the recording was non other than Loh Gwo Burne.

This political greenhorn, who is still learning to speak proper Bahasa Malaysia, became the MP of Kelana Jaya under the PKR ticket in 2008 general election. Although Gwo Burne stated that he recorded the conversation out of boredom, it was a full 14 minutes recording nevertheless. He could test his new found camera at the time to record everything else, but he chose to record VK Lingam’s conversation non stop for the whole 14 minutes. Furthermore, what astonished me was the fact that Anwar kept the original copy all this while. How did he get the copy? From Gwo Burne himself no doubt. 

Now, Gwo Burne is offering his seat for Anwar to contest in the possible by-election. That whole event was suspiciously conspired by Anwar. If blackmailing is Anwar’s modus operandi in obtaining power and gaining political mileage, we will see another round of surrendering our sovereignty to foreign powers.”

Today, Dr Mahathir spoke his thoughts about the same incident. He said that the objective of the recording was to undermine the credibility of VK Lingam who incidentally was the defence lawyer for Dr Mahathir against the defamation suit of Anwar Ibrahim.

SHAH ALAM: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has questioned the way in which the V.K. Lingam clips were released by his former deputy Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

The former prime minister said the fact that the clips were released in batches was not mentioned in the Royal Commission of Inquiry’s hearing into the matter.

“Anwar did not give the full tape at one go. He released the tape in two parts,’’ he said. “That constitutes tampering of evidence because we do not know what he kept behind and how many more tapes he has.”

He said this was the work of Anwar, who wanted to undermine the credibility of Lingam as he was Dr Mahathir’s lawyer.

“He has succeeded in making Lingam not credible and now Lingam cannot defend me in the courts of law.

“I have always emphasised that when people make secret recordings, the intention is to blackmail. And I am afraid this Government has made a blackmail attempt successful,” he said.

Now do we need a leader who has no qualms in blackmailing other people? If we have a leader who blatantly condone or in fact partake in a blackmailing act, shouldn’t we dismiss this kind of person as a leader? Notice how Gow Burne made different stand in his statement during the commission hearing and also after the commission finalised their findings;

He initially said;

KUALA LUMPUR: The person, who took the controversial clip purportedly showing a lawyer brokering the appointment of judges over a mobile phone, said it was made by accident.

Loh Gwo Burne, the 34-year-old son of businessman Loh Mui Fah, said he was trying to take a picture of a vase when he realised his digital camera was on video mode.

“I then continued to record the conversation between Datuk V.K. Lingam and the other person on the other line.

“I was bored and fed up with the lawyer for constantly talking on the phone, as he was supposed to discuss legal matters with my father,” said the 12th witness on the sixth day of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the video clip yesterday.

When Thayalan pointed out that the camera seemed to be placed behind a book, as it seemed from the video, Gwo Burne said he was reading a magazine and a coffeetable book at that time, and that the camera was hung around his neck.

Whereas in The Star 10th May 2008 he said;

PETALING JAYA: The real work has only just begun with the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on the V.K. Lingam video clip, said Kelana Jaya MP Loh Gwo Burne.

Loh, who recorded the video clip, said the findings should open the way for further investigations into whether there were other similar cases within the judiciary.

“This is just the flagpole at the tip of the iceberg. Who knows if there are others who are doing what V.K. Lingam did?” he said when contacted yesterday.

He was asked to comment on the findings of the report.

One has to question his intention in recording the incident. Was it just because he was bored, or did he have some other sinister, ulterior motive? Reading between the lines in his latest statement above, it seems that it was all along his intention to snare VK Lingam.

And just because he took part in the blackmailing process, he was selected as a candidate of PKR in the last general election and consequently became an MP for Kelana Jaya. What a prize to be won for helping a leader blackmailing others as a political mileage. But of course, the public were quite senseless and fickle in their selection criteria. We are fed with so much propaganda and political misdirections that the public became utterly incapable of wisely choosing their own representative to the government. If blackmailing is condoned by these kind of leaders, imagine what kind of dirty tactics and other acts of power abuse they can do to you, the public.

Hence, the blackmailing MP and his blackmailing mentor got their way in blackmailing the government and the public. Now I am not saying that what VK Lingam did was right. Pending the Commission’s findings made public, any act of trying to broker the appointment of judges and influencing the top leaders decisions in appointing judges is a huge offence by anyone’s standards. But the act of blackmailing nonetheless, is wrong. You do not make two wrongs to make a right. An evil deed is still evil regardless whether it’s a lesser or greater evil.

Am I the only one who sees blackmail as a selfish, despicable act? Also, am I the only one who think that the BN MPs are just a bunch of ignorant idiots who are not doing anything in highlighting this gross act? Dr Mahathir had even complained on the issue of tampering with evidence. But nobody seemed to take the cue. Oh well, stupidity had always been the cause of many governments’ and nations’ downfall. I pray that the people would choose their leaders wisely in the future.

Update 14 May 2008:

Loh Gwo Burne made a boo boo in his interview with The Star today :

KUALA LUMPUR: The VK Lingam video clip shown to the Royal Commission of Inquiry is only some 20% to 30% of what was recorded that night at the prominent lawyer’s house in December 2001.

“I downloaded the video from my private computer into several hard disks and compact discs. When I went to work in China in 2004, I took it along,” Loh told The Star.

“What has been made public is only about 20%-30% of what I filmed,” Loh said.

The Kelana Jaya MP said he had not viewed the videos that he had left in China for some time and therefore could not be precisely sure of what else they contain.

However, from memory, Loh, 34, said he remembered that Lingam had mentioned about how he had manipulated cases to his advantage by using certain lawyers against certain judges to make sure the judgments would be in his favour.

That night in December 2001, he started his camera to film a bowl or vase in Lingam’s house because he was bored to be kept waiting by the lawyer “who was forever on the phone.”

“But when Lingam started asking someone on the other line not to worry, that he would be chief justice soon, I knew I had a once in a lifetime opportunity to document something that may one day help prove something is seriously wrong with the judiciary,” said Loh.

As I said in the original article, Gwo Burne actually had lied during his testimony in the Haidar commission. Originally he said he was bored but now he came out saying the recording was intentional. In my opinion, the credibility of the witness is quite damaged. What more with his own revelation that the 14 minutes recording is only 20% to 30% of the original recording, That means, he recorded a whole 1 hour out of boredom. And what perplexed me is, how can the commission took into account only parts of the main evidence and not the whole of it? Was the commission even aware of the rest of the recording? And why was only 14 minute video recording was released by Datuk Seri Anwar and not the rest of it? Surely there would be some other compelling issues which could have been highlighted to the courts. I smell selective prosecution in the air. Maybe his own name was mentioned in the recording. Maybe some other powerful people were implicated. We can never know. 

Anyway, the commission should take into account and watch the whole recording before arriving at their conclusion. Either this was intentional or not, it is a clear case of implied malicious intent in the part of Gow Burne and also I think it is wrong to withold evidence. As for the commission itself, the acceptance of only parts of the evidence would create some reasonable doubt over the judgement itself. The burden of proof should be beyond any reasonable doubt. Hence, the exclusion of the rest of the recording could greatly discredit the commision’s report.            





The CEO and the Pegawai Tadbir explored further

9 05 2008

Pak Lah’s administration continuously trying to fight the criticisms hurled at them with much disarray. Supplementing the mistakes with weak and sometimes illogical excuses, one has to wonder whether who are the brains behind this malignant administration. It is a no-brainer (pun intended) that KJ runs the show. And lately, people from all walks of life are questioning the wisdom in most of the decisions made by the PM. Sometimes, we are stupified by his statements that came forth from his mouth.

I do not wish to repeat what had been said in this blog. But today, Tun Dr Mahathir sealed the manifestation of the people’s grievances/protests/complaints in a letter published in The Sun and copied in http://malaysiavoices.blogspot.com. This letter highlighted some of the points I had wrote in an entry a couple of days ago and another entry here sometime ago.

Why BN and Umno performed miserably
by Dr Mahathir Mohamad

DATUK Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, the president of Umno, chairman of the Barisan Nasional and Prime Minister of Malaysia has blamed everyone else except himself for the miserable performance of the coalition in the 12th general election.
 
He has blamed the whole electorate for not wanting him to get a two-thirds majority; BN members and Umno members in Kedah and Perak for sabotage; Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah for BN’s defeat in Kelantan and myself for speaking against him and his government.
 
He is not too far wrong. There is a lot of truth in what he says. I know that many Umno members voted for the Opposition. I admit that what I said may have influenced some of them into doing the unthinkable
.
But the more important question is why did they do this. Umno members had always been loyal to the party. They would never vote for the Opposition, particularly PAS and DAP. Yet they did in the 2008 general election. How else could the Opposition parties win if they did not get the votes of BN supporters? The reduction in the votes for BN candidates very nearly matches the increase in votes for the opposition parties.

In the last 50 years and 11 general elections Umno members and the average Malaysian had never failed to support Umno or the Alliance/BN. Except for 1969 when the Chinese withdrew their support, the Alliance and the BN had won a two-thirds majority every time.

Neither Tunku Abdul Rahman (the 1969 general election excepted), nor Tun Razak, nor Tun Hussein Onn, nor yours truly had won less than two-thirds. Certainly we never had occasion to accuse Umno members of sabotaging their party. Yet Abdullah, by his own admission, has apparently been “sabotaged” by Umno members.

Umno members did not want their party to lose. But they needed to send a message to Abdullah and his coterie of “Yes Men”. They could not speak their minds because all avenues were closed to them. Delegates to the Umno General Assembly were chosen because they would not criticise the president. My son Mukhriz had commented that there was nothing new in the president’s speech in 2006 and he was called up by the Umno Youth Committee, was scolded and told to choose between his father and the president.
 
The Umno Supreme Council and the cabinet were full of Yes-Men who never voiced the dissatisfaction or the complaints of the Umno rank and file. Umno members were forbidden on pain of disciplinary action from listening to any talk by people not approved by the president. This includes me. The police and the state Umno called up people who invited me and told them to withdraw their invitations.
 
Since Umno members could not express their real opinion regarding the government at any time and in any place, the only way they could convey their disenchantment with it was through voting at the general election. Voting was relatively secret and no action could be taken against them. So scared were the Umno voters that they might be found out that they never revealed to each other or to anyone of their intention to vote for the Opposition. And so it was that no one accurately forecast the massive swing in favour of the Opposition.

Some Umno members could not bring themselves to vote for the Opposition. And so they deliberately spoiled their votes. There were more than 300,000 spoilt votes in all, a record. It cannot be that after 50 years and 11 elections the voters still did not know how to vote.

Maybe it was because of me that Umno voters acted the way they did. I did urge Umno members to vote for good candidates and not just vote for the party. Umno could have fielded really good candidates but despite the president assuring that all the candidates were clean and qualified, they lost. This was because the candidates were not good and they often replaced the giant-killers who had done well in the past. Most of the “parachuted” candidates were young and Umno members were angry because they suspected that these young candidates were chosen by one person. Do a survey and find out how many of these new candidates lost.

The leadership apparently believed that Umno members would vote for any candidate chosen by the party leader. The leadership, was grossly mistaken.

But so angry were the Umno voters that they voted even for opposition candidates who were educationally unqualified and inexperienced.

The present leadership of Umno and BN, in particular Abdullah, should face facts. The electorate did not reject or “sabotage” the BN for no reason. In 2004 they had not seen Abdullah perform. So there was no sabotage. But in 2008 they had already seen Abdullah reveal his true colours. They did not like it.

The first thing he did when becoming prime minister was to bring his family unofficially into the government. He can deny this but people know the activities of Khairy Jamaluddin and Kamaluddin Abdullah and their cronies, including those of the fourth floor. They often sit in meetings of government committees and when the prime minister met people.

Khairy’s winning the deputy Umno Youth post uncontested disgusted many people. Had it been a party veteran with years of service to the party winning uncontested, no one would object. But Khairy had been in Umno less than five years and had no record of service to Umno. How could he win uncontested?

Early in his term of office, Abdullah decided not to go ahead with the so-called mega projects initiated by me. That was his right. But what was not right and what caused people to think he was being vindictive was the suggestion that I was wasting money on my many “pet” projects so much so that the government no longer had money to continue with them. Actually people know the projects were necessary. Imagine Malaysia without the KLIA, Sentral Station, Penang Bridge, North-South Highway, double-tracking and electrification [Malaysia Alternative Voices : Double Track Project awarded to Gamuda costed RM14.5 Billion from Johor to Padang Besar in 2003 (when Pak Lah aborted the project but was reawarded on Dec 2007 to Gamuda for RM 12.5 Billion for Ipoh to Padang Besar - less than half the initial project length) - How many billions has the Government/Peoples lost as the result of Abdullah Badawi decision to postpone the project? - Personal View of Malaysia Alternative Voices, not TDM's view or opinion], the LRT and monorail for Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya and Cyberjaya, toll roads, Westport, Tanjung Pelepas Port, Formula 1 circuit, KL Tower, ports, etc.

I will not mention the things he did which affected me alone and are not generally known to the public. This is because the voting public could not have been influenced by this. 

But what is known is his reaction to my criticism regarding the APs (Approved Permits) and the decision not to build the “crooked” bridge in Johor. He and his ministers publicly abused me and at one stage wanted to expel me from the party. Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz was extremely rude.

People felt that he and his cabinet colleagues, many of whom were appointed by me were most ungrateful. People know that but for me Abdullah would not be the prime minister today. So were most of the others for they were made ministers by me. They used to be my strong supporters, kissing my hand and some cried when I stepped down. Now they turned on me and denigrated me in a most unbecoming way. I don’t really care but I think the people regard this behaviour as just bad.

The fear Abdullah instilled in his ministers, members of the Umno Supreme Council and other party leaders was such that none dared to stand up to defend me or to counter what Abdullah and his colleagues said.

If Singapore could not agree to build a straight bridge unless sand was sold to it, we could have gone on to build the “crooked” bridge which had nothing to do with Singapore. Irked by the refusal of Johoreans to sell sand and allow Singapore warplanes to fly over Johor air space, Abdullah disallowed the construction of even the “crooked” bridge. Why?

I am sure it was because the one billion cubic metres of sand he wanted to sell to Singapore was objected to by Johor. Someone stood to make RM1 billion or more over 20 years from the sale of sand. Singapore would like to have the sand at above market price even as the land reclaimed would be sold at S$3,000-S$5,000 per sq ft.

The objection by Johor was because mining the seabed sand would cause erosion of the shores, destroy fish breeding grounds and deprive Johor fishermen of their fishing ground. The royalty collected by Johor would be nothing compared to what Singapore could make from selling reclaimed land.

There were other things done by Abdullah which the people did not like. These include matters related to the issuance of APs, the sale of MV Agusta, the CIQ building in Johor Baru, the double-tracking of the railway from JB to Padang Besar, miniature mosques and crystal mosques in Terengganu, the Monsoon Cup, the various corridors and the extensive renovation of Sri Perdana.

There were many other unpopular things done by Abdullah which alienated Umno and BN members and the voters in general. If there is anyone to blame for the miserable performance of Umno and BN, it is Abdullah himself. This is the opinion of the vast majority of Malaysians. If they are allowed to speak freely, this is what they would say.

No matter how strongly he denies that he is the cause, no matter how many people he blames, he cannot explain why this catastrophe to the Umno, MCA, MIC and Gerakan and the BN had never happened under four previous prime ministers but happens only during this tenure. He cannot explain why the “sabotage” by Umno and the component party members in 2008 when in the past they had been very loyal and never failed to give the Alliance and the BN two-thirds majority in Parliament and control of almost all the states. If he refuses to go and tries to ignore the calls for his removal until the next election, the disgusted voters and party members will probably ensure the BN will be defeated at federal and state levels as the only way to end his premiership.

DAP and PAS will want to ensure that Abdullah remains until the next election because, as in 2008, the disgusted BN supporters will vote for the Opposition. This will be even more likely if PAS and DAP provide good government for the states under their care.

When that happens there will be no hope for Umno to make a comeback.

As I said, I admit some responsibility for the poor showing of Umno and BN. Had Abdullah won big he would continue with his disregard for the objectives of his Umno, for the well-being of Malaysia.

I would consider myself a betrayer of my country if I allow this to happen. And those sycophants who fawn before Abdullah will also be betrayers of their country, their people and for Malays, their religion even.

In the final analysis, the responsibility for the losses sustained by the BN is with the prime minister himself. If he wishes to redeem himself and help resuscitate Umno and BN, he should resign now and let others rehabilitate the parties. As long as he remains Umno president, BN chairman and prime minister, recovery would be impossible.

Dr Mahathir Mohamad
Kuala Lumpur

I have to agree with Tun’s honest assessment. In one of my blog entry, I commented to a reader as below:

Obviously the effort to subtly demonize the ex PM had proven to be successful. In the effort to cover up the current PM’s failure as a businessman and salesman of Malaysia, the public were made to believe the current situation we’re in is the cause of TDM. I strongly believe, Pak Lah screwed up a well organized nation he inherited. How? By screwing up the nation’s priorities. How? By developing the wrong kind of projects. Tell me, besides the wasteful Masjid Krystal and Perkampungan Hadhari in Terengganu, what other projects/infrastructures he had successfully built? Do you know what was the annual Malaysia’s budget since 2004? Around RM130 billions to RM160 billions. Where did it go? Even with much, much lower budget during his time, TDM managed to propel the nation efficiently through effective and smart nation building process.

It seems unbelievable that Pak Lah is feeling so self righteous about his performance. We were fed with so many of his failures, but yet, unable to voice our criticisms. Hence, the apparent surge in blogging community. In one of an entry in this particular blog, I lashed out to comment;

They can lie all they want but we know better… When Pak Lah took over, he said Malaysia has no money although Dr Mahathir strongly denied it. And then, instead of doing some prudent spending (as logic dictates if the country has indeed no money), he spent lavishly on buying private airbus, doing the stupid monsoon cup, launching corridors, etc. as well as raising fuel price to get more money. He was spending money like nobody’s business. And then now, after looting the country of its riches since 2003, he claimed the country has no more money. If you look at all the physical projects he proposed in 2004, non was completed. Don’t believe me? Look at the RMK9 projects. Even some of RMK8 projects were scrapped (coz he said very wasteful and we need to save the money - like the crooked bridge). But now how? Pak Lah is an idiot. Even that is an understatement.

In other matters, Tun also commented on the payment of ex-gratia to the judges from the 1988 judiciary crisis. He gave us the glimpse on the behind the curtain scenes which the public had not been privy of. He also confirmed my suspicions in my article which I wrote here.

The Ex-Gratia Payment

The Malaysian Government of Dato Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi recently decided to pay certain judges ex-Gratia Payments.

Clearly the Government felt contrite over what had happened to these judges many years ago, and felt a need to make amends, but not quite enough to apologise as was suggested by the de facto Minister of Justice, Dato Zaid Ibrahim.

In fact if newspaper reports are to be believed the Cabinet rejected the proposal by the new Law Minister. Nothing was decided about the ex-Gratia payment.

But a dinner was held by the Bar Council which rumours say was paid for by the Government during which the Prime Minister announced two things which must gladden the hearts of members of the Bar.

The announcement were;

1) A commission would appoint judges

2) Ex-Gratia payments would be paid to Tun Salleh Abbas and the six judges who tried to frustrate the work of the first tribunal.

I will not elaborate on the Tun Salleh case reserving this for the future. But in my blog, the question was asked whether the ex-Gratia payments constitute contempt of the Tribunal.

Not being a lawyer I cannot really say with certainty but I understand the rules and procedures which apply to the courts do not necessarily apply to the Tribunal. So they may not be in contempt.

But the fact remains that the payments imply that the Government does not quite agree with the decisions of the properly constituted Tribunals. Perhaps it is because the quality of mercy was not exercised. Perhaps it is because the judges suffered from financial losses because of the findings of the Tribunals.

I would like to clarify here, and I stand to be corrected of course, that on appeal by the Attorney-General, I agreed that all the judges be paid their full pensions.

Again if I am not mistaken Tun Salleh Abbas was entitled to and accordingly draws two pensions; one when he reached the age of fifty-five and another at the end of his term as Lord President following his dismissal.

It is possible that as a former State Councillor he also draws a pension.
Maybe I should mention here that I am not so fortunate since I was never paid any pension when I attained the age of 55. Instead I only received my pension when I stepped down in 2003, at the age of 78.

The other judges were also paid their pensions and where they fulfilled the Malaysian pension scheme they too would receive two pensions.

I mention this only for the purpose of comparison. I am not seeking any pension or ex-Gratia or whatever payment from the Government upon reaching the statutory age of 65.

It was reported in the newspapers today that as Petronas Adviser, I am paid RM15,000 a month, not by the Government but by Petronas. I would like to state that this income is taxable and a sum of RM4,500 is deducted monthly.

I also serve as Adviser for Proton, the Langkawi Island Development Authority (LADA) and the Tioman Island Development Authority. For these three entities, I do not receive any form of payment nor do I seek any. If it is felt that the Government can ill-afford the allowance I receive the Government can always stop paying. I will continue to serve even if I am paid nothing.

It also shows the magnanimity of a statesman. How many of us actually being paid more than Tun himself in a month? A measly RM15K per month for an ex prime minister? And that does not include deductions on tax. I for one am ashamed that a leader of a country being given shoddy treatment by his successsors.

 





Government’s pissing me off (Update 06/05/2008)

6 05 2008

I wrote on this blog the article below on 5th March 2008;

I am extremely pissed off with the government. Not only because of its wastage and corruption but more so by its sheer stupidity.

In the Star today, the big boss of SPR says they will cancel the use of indelible ink due certain quarters are going to abuse the ink. Okay, kita terima penjelasan tak konkrit dia ni. But then what pisses me off is that in the last paragraph, he stated that in order for the ink to be used, amendmends have to be made on the Article 119 of the Federal Constitution. It’s like a kick in the teeth.

Hello! You didn’t do your homework on this before you bought the ink ke??!! It’s like presenting to your boss about your project idea but then 6 months down the line, just after the project gonna be implemented and certain costs have been contracted, I
go and tell my boss, the job can’t be done coz I forgot about certain law that may jeapordize the project in the first place.

I would be sacked on the spot wouldn’t I? I’d be labelled stupid will I not?
Same goes for this Rashid guy. After spending RM2.4 million of taxpayers’ money, he still has the audacity to remain as the big boss of SPR? Muka tak tau malu ke? What the hell man?!

I’d say sack him! Why is the PM still keeping an inefficient person as the head of SPR? ARE YOU BLIND AND STUPID PAK LAH? Go and drink all that 48,000 bottles of ink la kasi pandai sikit…!!

Refer also to this here.

The ink was purchased at the cost of RM2.4 million whereby 47,000 bottles have already arrived from India. The Deputy SPR even said that the usage of the ink has to follow the election rules and procedures of the country which I guess, at that point of time, he had indeed done his homework.

But alas, like Pak Lah always said -

JANGAN BEKERJA UNTUK SAYA TETAPI TIDURLAH BERSAMA-SAMA SAYA!

Idiots.

UPDATE : No evidence indelible ink was brought in

KUALA LUMPUR: The police have not found any evidence that indelible ink was brought into the country from Thailand in the run-up to the recent general election.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar said in a written reply to Fong Po Kuan (DAP - Batu Gajah) in Dewan Rakyat Tuesday that after studying the report that it had received and interviewing all the witnesses and complainant involved, the police found no such evidence.

“This is because not one witness has ever seen the ink. From their testimony, no individual, syndicate or certain parties have been identified to be involved in such activities.

“The statement made by the complainant and the witnesses were thus rumours and no individual has been positively identified or known to be involved.

“The investigation papers have been refered to the deputy prosecutor’s office on March 14. On March 31, the case has been classified as ‘no further action’,”he said.

The Election Commission had planned to use indelible ink in the general election. However, a few days before polling day on March 8, the plan was scrapped by the commission, citing concerns over a possible sabotage.

Syed Hamid said three investigation papers had been opened under Section 420 or 511 of the Penal Code by the Commercial Crimes Division.

“The police report was lodged by a few individuals who were concerned over the use of the indelible ink as this can be easily obtained in Thailand.

“They were worried that certain groups with interest would abuse the ink during the general election,” he said.

Why did he say ‘no further action’? I’d say, we haul the individuals who made the false reports to the courts and throw them in jail! And the police sure did a horrible job in reporting to the EC some information without even gathering concrete proof! I can still remember the IGP sitting beside the EC chairman during the news conference regarding this matter. Bersungguh sungguh dia bercerita about all those reports on potential abuses. Sigh. We are indeed being run by idiots. 

Anyway, making false police report is a crime isn’t it? I’m sure I read it somewhere… reading all this stupidity made me lose a lot of braincells.

 





The CEO and the Pegawai Tadbir

6 05 2008

Before everyone labels this blog as anti anwar (which I think most people had already done so), let me say this once and for all, this blog is not about anti anwar or anti pak lah or even anti karpal singh. This blog is actually a blog that highlights any form of non efficiency, non effectiveness and any form of idiocy perpetuated by the Malaysian government and politicians. If the politicians make any stupid comments, they get some bashing from this blog. If they say something which was not well researched, be sure that they’ll be at the receiving end of an entry here. That has been the main theme of this blog.

On that note, here are a few snippets that may differentiate between a weak, clueless government and the more able and driven one.

09/10/1997 Trade promotion missions help to boost ties: Dr M

PRIME Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad says trade promotion missions headed by him have helped to improve Malaysia’s economic and trade relations with Africa, West Asia and Central Asia. Exports to Africa rose to RM2.049 billion last year from RM1.219 billion in 1994, West Asia to RM3.8 billion from RM2.3 billion, South America to RM2.6 billion from RM2.1 billion, and Central Asia to RM352 million from RM178 million, the Prime Minister told the Dewan Rakyat yesterday. - NST

A government with good governance shows strong determination in any of its decision. No flip flopping over the slightest critic.

Kawalan mata wang kekal - PM

”Ia juga tidak menyakitkan kita, jadi kenapa perlu diubah? Semua (ahli) perniagaan gembira,” katanya dalam majlis dialog sempena seminar sehari Ramalan Perniagaan Malaysia anjuran Strategic Intelligence (M) Sdn. Bhd. yang dihadiri oleh ahli ekonomi terkemuka, Profesor Paul Krugman, di sini hari ini.

KUALA LUMPUR 27 Ogos - Kawalan tukaran mata wang Malaysia akan dikekalkan kerana sistem kewangan antarabangsa masih belum direformasi, kata Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.

Beliau berkata, walaupun keadaan sudah nampak tenang, risiko serangan lanjut masih ada kerana pedagang mata wang masih tidak dapat dikawal.

A great leader should be able to shape and induce inspiration to not only his nation, but also capable of swaying and persuading other global leaders to move towards greatness as well.

Hadapi cabaran bersama — PM ajak China tentang kuasa luar eksploitasi Asia Timur

BEIJING 19 Ogos - Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad hari ini mengajak Republik Rakyat China bersama-sama bangkit menghadapi pelbagai cabaran dalam abad ke-21, terutamanya daripada kuasa-kuasa luar yang mahu mengeksploitasi kelemahan.

Oleh kerana itu, kata Dr. Mahathir, demi kepentingan bersama dan juga Asia Timur pada keseluruhannya, China dan Malaysia mesti bangkit menghadapi cabaran kerana kejayaannya akan membawa banyak faedah kepada rakyat kedua negara dan negara serantau.

”Kemakmuran masyarakat Asia Timur dalam alaf baru ini merupakan satu usaha mulia dan setimpal dengan apa yang kita usahakan,” tegasnya.

Beliau berkata demikian dalam ucaptama di Forum Malaysia-China ke-3 yang diadakan sempena menyambut ulang tahun ke-25 hubungan diplomatik kedua negara di sini hari ini.

Serentak itu Perdana Menteri mengajak China bekerjasama dengan Malaysia dan lain-lain negara jiran untuk memastikan pemulihan ekonomi yang terjamin bagi Asia Timur.

Untuk mengelak berulangnya kehancuran ekonomi, Perdana Menteri mencadangkan supaya China dan Malaysia bekerjasama menyuarakan pendapat dan bersama-sama dengan negara-negara Asia Timur mendesak negara-negara maju berusaha mewujudkan satu bentuk kewangan global yang baru.

…and another one;

Amanat PM untuk APEC

(Di Bangkok, Thailand) Mesej Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad pada anggota Kerjasama Ekonomi Asia Pasifik (APEC) ialah: Wujudkan satu peraturan perdagangan global yang bukan saja bebas tetapi adil dan saksama kepada negara membangun, miskin dan lemah; dan: APEC perlu kembali ke matlamat asal - bincang isu ekonomi daripada menjadi forum keselamatan.

Jika ini dapat direalisasikan, APEC yang diwujudkan pada November 1989 atas sebab ekonomi akan dapat bertahan dan terus menjadi relevan bagi menjaga kepentingan negara-negara kecil daripada terus dijajah dan ditekan oleh negara maju serta kaya.

Negara maju melihat globalisasi merupakan ubat yang baik untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi negara-negara Dunia Ketiga khususnya.

Sebab itu, Dr. Mahathir ketika membincangkan isu globalisasi, cabaran dan ketidakadilan pada mesyuarat APEC-CEO, mahu agenda perdagangan turut datang dari negara membangun.

Menurut Dr. Mahathir: “Perdagangan yang adil tentunya bebas, tapi perdagangan yang bebas belum tentu adil.” Pembuat agenda WTO lupa agaknya, 70 daripada 146 anggota pertubuhan itu mewakili negara-negara membangun.

Barang diingat, apa yang ditekankan oleh Dr. Mahathir bukan untuk kepentingan Malaysia semata-mata. Perdagangan yang adil adalah untuk semua negara daripada negara kaya dan maju sehinggalah ke negara yang paling miskin dan lemah.

Sidang kemuncak di Bangkok ini juga penting sebab ia memastikan rundingan perdagangan WTO dapat disambung semula. Selama perbincangan dua hari ini, pemimpin APEC yang diketuai oleh AS mahu melihat rundingan perdagangan itu diteruskan.

Bagi Malaysia yang biasanya menjadi jurucakap negara membangun, rundingan itu bukan sahaja perlu diteruskan tetapi agendanya perlu baru yang mengambil kira kepentingan semua negara. Lebih daripada itu, perdagangan global yang dicadangkan itu perlu adil dan saksama.

Confidence in the economy is vital in attracting investments from overseas. Prosperous economy is achieved from high purchasing power, coupled with the feel-good feeling generated from the public as they are confident that the government knows what they are doing. A strong government needs the people’s trust in order move forward effectively.   

27/10/2000 Unjuran pertumbuhan ekonomi 7% adalah wajar

KUALA LUMPUR 27 Okt. - Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad berkata, unjuran pertumbuhan ekonomi tujuh peratus bagi tahun depan adalah wajar kerana ekonomi negara masih berkembang pada kadar yang pantas.

”Tahun ini kita jangka pertumbuhan 7.8 peratus (walaupun) pada asalnya kita membuat anggaran 5.8 peratus, jadi untuk capai pertumbuhan 7 peratus pada tahun depan bukanlah keterlaluan,” katanya kepada pemberita selepas pembentangan Belanjawan 2001 di Dewan Rakyat hari ini.

Menurut Dr. Mahathir, ekonomi Malaysia masih dalam keadaan baik dan berkembang pada kadar yang pantas.

”Dulu kita capai lapan peratus lebih, bahkan sembilan peratus selama 10 tahun berturut-turut.

”Berdasarkan prestasi tahun ini yang lebih tinggi, tentunya agak sukar untuk kita mencapainya (tahun depan) tetapi saya rasa ia boleh dicapai, melainkan jika ekonomi dunia runtuh,” katanya.

Media was free to say just about anything except for those that touches race and religion; 

CYBERJAYA 19 Jan. - Perdana Menteri berkata kebebasan diberikan kepada media massa dalam membuat laporan, sekalipun ia menonjolkan aspek negatif seperti yang sering diamalkan media asing.

Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad berkata, media asing misalnya kerap menonjolkan aspek negatif apabila melaporkan sesuatu ucapannya.

”Mereka sering menonjolkan aspek negatif daripada ucapan saya. Kita beri kebebasan…,” katanya ketika menjawab satu soalan wakil media asing, selepas mempengerusi mesyuarat Majlis Pelaksanaan Koridor Raya Multimedia (MSC) di sini.

Perdana Menteri juga berkata kerajaan membenarkan media membuat spekulasi mengenai sesuatu perkara, jika itulah yang akan meningkatkan jualan serta menambahkan pembaca akhbar mereka.
 

Fast forward into Pak Lah’s administration, we were initially surprised by his lack of apparent deliberation in certain issues. At first is was mistakenly recognised as his mild and soft character trait. But as 4 years went by in a blistering snail pace, we saw more and more inefficiency coming from his governing style. Take this issue for example. It could be handled easily if it was thought through carefully.

Naked woman incident a blow to country’s image

VALLETTA (Malta): The video clip showing a naked woman doing ear squats while watched by another woman in uniform has shamed the country, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

He said the incident had dealt a blow to the country’s image and pledged a thorough investigation into the issue.

No party should attempt to conceal any facts that might be uncovered as a result of the investigations, said a visibly-upset Abdullah, who called Malaysian journalists here to give his comments before rushing off to attend the opening ceremony of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting yesterday.

Malaysian newspapers had front-paged the incident after Seputeh MP Teresa Kok showed the video clip at Parliament House on Thursday.

The 70-second video clip, said to have been taken with a cellphone-camera, had been circulated through the multimedia messaging service (MMS) over the past few days.

As the result of this debacle, 2 editors of chinese dailies were sacked, a minister had to apologise to China over nothing, and a redundant and meaningless independent commission were establish just to determine what really happened.

Take another example of a mind boggling stupidity;

Proton disposes MV Agusta for 1 Euro

Proton Holdings has sold it’s 57.57 percent stake in MV Agusta Spa to an Italian company Gevi Spa. Gevi Spa will assume MV Agusta’s debts and working capital requirements totalling 139.44 million euros, as announced today to Bursa Malaysia by Proton Holdings as part of it’s non-core asset divesting exercise.

Interesting to note that Proton originally acquired MV Agusta Spa last year on July 7 2004 for 70 million Euro, and finally sold it for a token sum of 1 Euro (RM4.48).

The sale was approved by Pak Lah, much to the chagrin of the Malaysian public. What more with the revelation from other sources a couple of months later.

Pak Lah’s inability to answer simple questions like the issues of awarding government projects to his son was quite phenomenal. As everyone remembered, he lied about his son receiving projects from the government. Next, he lied that he actually did not know about the projects that his son ever received. Then, he covered it up by misdirecting the issue altogether;

“The projects awarded to Dr Mahathir’s children were far bigger than what Scomi received,” he told reporters at his Hari Raya open house in Penang just now.

Abdullah said it’s also not true that his son’s company, Scomi Group, had no ship but won a contract from TNB to transport coal. Kamaluddin, he added, “has 180 ships owned by another company which was acquired by Scomi… (Dr Mahathir’s) children also received contracts, only it’s not highlighted.”

His inability to do simple financial equations like the cost/benefit ratio which was portrayed through the scraping of the ’Scenic Bridge’ was another fine example of his non efficiency and money wasting tendency. His reasoning? The country has no money, therefore we need to be more stringent. Later on, the public soon found out that the cost of scraping the bridge was much more expensive than to actually build it.   

On the other hand, media was stifled and made to toe the line. Criticism and opinions not agreed with were severely dealt with like what happened here;

KUALA LUMPUR: Blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamarudin is expected to be charged with sedition at the Kuala Lumpur Court in Jalan Duta today.

The 58-year-old confirmed he received a telephone call from a police officer last night informing him to be at the court at 9.30am.

“I was told by an officer to appear in court to be charged with sedition with regard to an article posted on my website.”

…and here;

Dalam mesyuarat BN Negeri Selangor, Pengerusi BN Selangor baru Senator Tan Sri Muhammad “Mike Tyson” Muhammad Taib memutuskan ahli UMNO dilarang sama sekali untuk menyertai Forum UMNO Pasca PRU12 anjuran portal politik MyKMU.net Selasa 1 April 2008 ini di Petaling Jaya.

Amaran dikeluarkan sekiranya ada ahli UMNO yang akan menghadiri forum tersebut, yang akan dirasmikan oleh Mantan Presiden UMNO Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad dan panel perbincangan pula terdiri dari Mantan Menteri Besar Selangor Dato’ Seri Dr. Mohamad Khir Toyo, Exco Pemuda UMNO Dato’ Mukhriz Mahathir dan Ketua Penerangan UMNO Johor Dr. Mohd. Fuad Zarkashi, tindakan akan diambil keatas mereka.

In the aspect of the economy, we have this to show for the past 4 years;

Foreign direct investment into Malaysia down

KUALA LUMPUR: Foreign direct investment (FDI) into Malaysia dipped to US$3.97bil (RM14.69bil) last year, compared to 2004 when US$4.62 bil (RM17.09bil) in FDIs was recorded.

For the first time since 1990, Indonesia managed to overtake Malaysia in drawing in FDIs.

Inflows to Indonesia surged by 177% to US$5.26bil (RM19.46bil) last year.

As a whole, FDIs to South, East and South-East Asia reached a new high of US$165bil (RM610.5bil) last year, which was a 19% increase over 2004.

China, Hong Kong and Singapore were the largest recipients of FDIs in 2005.

The figures were released by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Unctad) in its World Investment Report 2006 on Monday.

There was no denying that Malaysia was a real success story from the late 80’s all the way to the new millenium. The main recipe for Malaysia’s success was through the approach of its leadership. If I may, Dr Mahathir led the nation as its CEO. He believed that as the CEO of the nation, it was his job to maximise the wealth of its shareholders (the people). Hence, we saw a nation being propelled to become one of the fastest growing nation in Asia in the 80’s and the 90’s. Prospering the shareholders was critical in order to gain respect from foreigners and instilling pride within the nation. The economy ‘pie’ was enhanced and it grew big.

On the other hand, Pak Lah’s style is somewhat akin to an administrator. Perhaps due to his career background as a government officer, he approaches leadership with much hesitation and indecisiveness. This maybe due to the fact that he finally found himself in the topmost seat of power without anyone to report to, or to turn to in the face of a problem. He finds himself accountable and responsible in all of the government’s actions and in-actions. We sometimes may see him overwhelmed with fatigue and exhaustion caused by having to think continuously. 

What Dr Mahathir saw as a challenge to further improve his self-actualization, Pak Lah instead saw it as a chore and would hastenly establish a committee to delegate the problem. As the result of this flip flopping and weak leadership, the economy ‘pie’ shrunk. And worse, most of the wealth in this shrunken pie benefitted only a few cronies.

In the end, one has to know one’s limits when trusted with a certain responsibility. One need to honestly take stock of his capabilities and then humbly pronounce your course of action. My advice to Pak Lah is to step down and let other capable leaders manage the country. Maybe then, we will remember him fondly as the selfless PM whom had recognised his own weakness and had stepped aside for the good of the nation.       

At this moment, we are reminded of a ’pantun’ by an ex prime minister whom some of us love demonize;

“Tiap permulaan ada akhirnya,
Menjadi peringatan kepada hamba,
Kuasa dan jawatan bukan segalanya,
Berkhidmat kepada bangsa dan negara.”

- Dr Mahathir, closing speech Umno General Assembly 2003, few months before he retired gracefully.

Now if that wasn’t a clear case of humility, I wouldn’t know what humble means.   

 

For other related article, please read here